Chomper Higgot

You feel aggrieved because you missed out on the ‘throwing’?

Forgive me for calling out your nonsense claim that: “Labour are responsible for half that £175,000,000 + per person.” I do understand why, in the face of an inability to back up your claims you resort to personal attacks.

Refer calculation and link above.

I attended a number of academic institutions, all of which pressed home the need to back up claims with credible evidence. So here’s your chance to show us how that’s done: “Labour are responsible for half that £175,000,000 + per person.” Let’s see you back that claim up with a credible link.

Labour are in the process of dealing with the migrant problem, refer positive improvements discussed above. I don’t comment on videos, this is a discussion forum.

Labour did not oppose deportations, they opposed the immensely costly, ineffective and illegal Rwanda scheme. Labour getting g the job done without recourse to performative cruelty, stoking racism or stuffing wads of cash into the chums of Government ministers. Glad to see at least one member hear recognizing the positive achievements of this Labour Government.

I worked it out by dividing the number of migrant who volunteered to removed to Rwanda under the Tory Government’s Rwanda scheme by the cost of that scheme. £700,000,000 / 4 = £175,000,000 per person. Refer links I provided above. Your links?

Except facts suggest otherwise: https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/starmer-tells-lfi-reception-release-of-hostages-number-one-item-for-a-gaza-ceasefire/

Even if that £3000/person is true, it’s vastly cheaper than the £175,000,000 per person the Tories spent. Refer links I provided above.

How did Labour stop the policies of a Tory Government that had an unassailable majority in Parliament? Go on Jonny, give it your best go.

The Tories managed to spend £700,000,000 on the Rwanda plant to remove 4 individuals who volunteered to accept the deal the Tory Gove Offered them. £175,000,000 per ‘voluntarily’ deported migrant. https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/prime-minister-rwanda-government-home-office-labour-b2606947.html

Hogwash, the Tories had an unassailable majority in Parliament, neither Labour nor the combined votes of all opposition parties could come close to out voting the Government’s Rwanda plans. With such an unassailable majority the Tories came up with a plan that failed from the offset to deliver its stated objective. It did however line the pockets of a select few with large wads of public money. Some fell for it, others profited from it. In that sense it was a success.

There was, by example, the PPE scam was another plundering of the public purse to direct money into the pockets of Troy Government chums.

They were held accountable, they were voted out of office. Labour put at stop to the Rwanda scam.

Nice bit of false accountancy there. The Rwanda scheme was exactly the failure it was predicted to be. It wasn’t ‘sabotaged’ it was an ill conceived mess from the start, draining hundreds of £millions from the nation’s taxpayers for nothing more than performance. The costs associated are entirely attributable to the Government that came up with the obvious idiocy. People who swallowed the whole scam will of course wish to find others to blame.

Jonny the only way a legal challenge can succeed is if the policy being challenged breaks the existing laws. Refer link I provided for Labour’s success deporting people who had no right to be in the UK.

I’ll wait for the jury verdict and then accept it regardless of which way it goes.

The tip of the iceberg that was Tory incompetence and corruption. Hundreds of £millions of tax payer’s money pished away, and/or handed to chums. Meanwhile Labour successfully deporting hundreds of people who have no right to be in the UK: https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/prime-minister-rwanda-government-home-office-labour-b2606947.html

I’m watching the series in YouTube, it’s very enjoyable.

It absolutely is a baseless and very serious accusation.

you answered the question yourself Brian, you clearly did not understand.

I’m not going to walk it back, it’s a factual observation.

Like you I don’t, nor, like you, do I know there will not be. That’s not too difficult to understand is it Brian?!

I think better to wait for a response rather than immediately reach for the antisemitism accusation. But I accept opinions and motives differ.

@A Mother's Plea for UK Hostage in Gaza: Petitions Keir Starmer”