Jump to content

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    37,289
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Everything posted by Chomper Higgot

  1. What she said was in clear breach of hate speech laws.
  2. That simply not true. I have in multiple occasions recognized your own, and other rightwing members’, very positive anti racist posts on this forum. I have argued such positive anti racist views demonstrate decency and that racist and hate mongering are not ‘characteristics’ of the right wing. So no, I do not only discriminate against ‘rightwing views’. I absolutely do discriminate against racists, on that you have got me banged to rights.
  3. I absolutely do discriminate against extreme right wingers convicted of vile racist calls to burn hotels full of human beings. You got me there, well done.
  4. I suggest you try to get over it. She’s now got a criminal record for ‘race hate crimes’. Her employment options for the rest of her life are a lot fewer than they were before she vomited her racist filth online.
  5. Ah the ‘2 tier Britain’ racist dogwhistle in a thread discussing the conviction of a vile extreme rightwing racist.
  6. Not rightwing political beliefs, extreme rightwing and vile racist beliefs. There’s a difference and it’s one I have mentioned many times on this forum. Not all right wingers are racists, as you and a couple of other rightwing members of this forum frequently demonstrate.
  7. In what sense at all does that address my post you were replying to?
  8. It does if your parents are legally resident. https://www.gov.uk/check-british-citizenship/born-in-the-uk-between-2-october-2000-and-29-april-2006
  9. It has absolutely no bearing on the matter. As demonstrated by the vile extreme rightwing racist being convicted in a court of law.
  10. Her words absolutely are having a consequence. Thankfully only visited upon herself.
  11. I recommend you don’t follow her example without taking professional advice on what the law has to say on the matter.
  12. Calling for hotels to be burned with people in them is not “Wrong speech” It’s full blown hate speech. Words have consequences, this far right racist is going to suffer the consequences of her own words, something far more preferable than others suffering the arson’s track she was calling for.
  13. If born in the UK it makes them British other than by descent - unquestionably British and not an immigrant.
  14. Yep, lock that whataboutary guy up too. Next.
  15. I’m not a fan of self proclaimed authoritarian ‘strongmen’ and I don’t pump myself up by sticking it to people on the lower rungs of human misery. Unlike some around here.
  16. I think your whataboutary guy should be locked up too. Next.
  17. No sign of JFK jr’s endorsement giving Trump a lift in the polls then.
  18. Trump’s mouth is an evidence rich environment. Spare thought for the investigators who have to go ‘bin diving’ in the stink to collect it.
  19. A line of argument you yourself have frequently made. I’ll remind you when you do so again.
  20. Lindsey Graham used to be even more critical, then his true colors leaked out. As you know, this happens.
×
×
  • Create New...