Chomper Higgot

Who hid the evidence? Case dismissed.

You obviously missed this:

The Tories had an unassailable majority in parliament. Labour pointing out flaws in the Tory bills in parliament (which is what the Opposition are supposed to do) did not hinder the Tories recklessly passing laws that would, as Labour pointed out, get tossed by the courts. Quit gaslighting, Labour did not create the problem, it was the Tories who failed - despite an unassailable majority in parliament.

OK, you don’t want to believe it.

How about we wait to see how Labour perform before whining? Labour are not ‘encouraging illegal immigration’, they are (and this has been said before) dealing with the problem they inherited from the Tories.

Too little too late. Still left over 100,000 asylum cases to be cleared by Labour. Routed at the election.

I’ll back my statement up that the Government cut immigration service staff with one of those things knows as ‘a link’.: https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/news/2022/01/24/savage-cuts-to-enforcement-staff-show-how-government-gets-things-backwards

Don’t worry Trump has an alternative: https://x.com/ianbremmer/status/1668703534320168960

Desperate stuff, but if makes you happy. Meanwhile, Labour are dealing with the over 100,000 asylum seekers left to them by the Tories.

The Tories withdrew funding from the immigration service and sat idle as the backlog of asylum claims grew. It is that backlog that Labour are now addressing.

Look in a mirror: The Bishop of Chelmsford told MPs she queried Rev Firth's claims. "The figures don't quite add up to me," the Right Reverend Guli Francis-Dehqani said. She added: "I have spoken to clergy who have turned people down [for baptism] because they did not feel they met the criteria." The clergy took baptisms very seriously, she said.

Fabricated nonsense.

Right so they stopped crossing just as the Tories were getting kicked out of Government. The failed Rwanda asylum seeker exchange scam had been in place for months, the failed Tory Government already been detaining asylum seekers in pretense that they were going to be deported, none of that stopped the boats. There were already over 100,000 asylum seekers in the UK being kept at tax payer expense because the Tories had failed to clear their applications. ———- Those people are now having their applications processed. Labour addressing a Tory failure. That’s what this news item is about.

There is no ‘Guaranteed asylum’. You are making stuff up. And the Rwanda plan did not stop people crossing the channel.

I asked did you check the weather. The weather is a factor in small boats crossing/not crossing, always has been. Of course it could be that in a matter of a couple of days people heard the news of Labour cancelling the failure Rwanda asylum seeker exchange scam and dashed across the globe to jump into small boats. If you don’t want to accept that weather is the more far more likely cause, go with the ridiculous.

It’s as it always has been, a significant problem for anyone wishing to cross the channel in a small boat. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68216757.amp

Did you check the weather?

Precisely the kind of intelligence and security cooperation someone has stated he wished to put an end to.

Correct, its a problem created by the Tories that Labour now need to sort out. And they are on it.

I wonder who this would benefit?

So Ukraine isn’t a European nation and the illegal military invasion of Ukraine isn’t a matter of concern for other European nations that happen to be nato Members. Or do you not understand what constitutes facts?!

The Government passed a bill that declares Rwanda a safe location to processes asylum seekers. So a bill passed in the UK Parliament makes Rwanda safe?

You should perhaps refrain from calling people liars when they make statements back by what the Home Office have said: ”The Home Office has said Rwanda has an initial capacity to take 200 people a year, but there are plans to increase that number when the scheme begins.” https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-67656220.amp

No please don’t.

You need to put more effort into working it out. When a Government passes a law, the new law can’t breach existing laws, otherwise it gets struck down by the courts. Sometimes members of the opposition write letters to the Government explaining they should halt process under new laws where there are clear indications of conflict with existing laws. A wise Government listens to such advice. The idiots that just got handed their backsides failed to do so. It’s not the fault of those who noticed and pointed out the problems.