Chomper Higgot

The location of the trial is based on the location of where the crimes were committed,

And the Judge made a specific point of informing Defendant Trump that he had and absolute right to give testimony in his own defense, expressly stating that the Partial Gag Order Defendant Trump is under placed no restrictions on his right to give testimony before the court in his own defence. Of course that testimony would be under oath and entirely at the defendant’s own volition. Trump chose not to testify. Anyone pinning hopes to his earlier promises and declarations that he would testify simply hasn’t learned the lesson that Trump’s promises are worth zilch,

What triggered that?

Coronation is not causation. But scapegoating immigrants is a thing:

Do you have a link to back up your claim that twelve Democrats are on the Jury? Do share.

I’ve not watched CNN for over ten years. So remind me, are CNN on the jury?

I and many others have posted the indictments against Trump more than once. You don’t accept the indictment. You don’t accept the trial. You will not accept any guilty verdict.

You’ve got a problem with Trump being inducted and tried for crimes he committed in the clear light of day?

I’ll make three predictions. AI will strip more wealth from ordinary working people and funnel it to the already hyper wealthy. Any proposals to address this and particularly proposals around taxation and regulation will be opposed by many amongst those who are themselves and/or their children are losing out to AI. AI will not replace cap doffers and forelock tuggers.

If you go to the top of the thread and read the OP you’ll find it’s a Tory PM Sunak topic.

Given the transcripts of his testimony are already published, what has he got to hide?

A few unemployed former Tory MPs

She wasn’t insulting the electorate, she was identifying deplorables within Trump’s base. Subsequent events demonstrated and continue demonstrate her assessment to be correct.

He’s falling apart by the day.

She’s an intelligent, articulate woman who speaks up for herself. For that alone she earns the bile of me who have a problem with intelligent, articulate women who speak up for themselves. Refer posting history of her more rabid detractors on this forum.

Ross Ulbricht is who Trump says he will release from prison back into the community. Tells you much of what you need to know: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Ulbricht

Nah. No body who voted for Trump was ever going to vote for Clinton.

You have seen which Party is backing legislation that singles out half the electorate on the basis of their gender?

The Deplorables were never going to vote for Clinton. Subsequent events have demonstrated her assessment to be correct.

I know a couple of normally Democrat voting women who stated they refused to vote for Hillary because she didn’t divorce Bill after his Lewinsky affair. I am sure this was a factor for many women. But I think a bigger factor is the U.S. is not yet ready for a female President, too many voters have their heads stuck in the 1950s.

Crime.

It’s not being ignored Brian. It’s been noticed by the electorate. Change is in the air.

She’s at least 10 years behind the curve.

Doomed, doomed, we’re all doomed.

I think you’ll find, I and others, have been discussing the failures in UK policing for a number of years now. In posts following my own months long visits to the UK I have frequently mentioned the total absence of police officers outside of transport hubs. Zoe lost her phone and an opportunist thief took advantage of her loss, it happens. Welcome Zoe to the reality of crime millions live with up and down the county. If only somebody had warned the Tories that reducing police numbers and decimating community policing would result in an increase in crime.