Chomper Higgot

Johnson has only one priority, Johnson. He can’t be strong on anything, least of all anything that requires making the right decisions for others. He blows with the wind.

Alex Jones has not had his rights to free speech removed or in anyway diminished. He’s still free to say whatever he wishes. He now knows that if he lies he may face the consequences of the harm his lies cause to others. There is no immunity from the consequences of one’s own choices and actions, including the choice to lie and the action of lying.

John, you need to at least try to stick to your argument. And yet there was a surge in people exercising by cycling and walking during lockdown, refer the credible link I provided and that you chose to edit out when responding to my post. You made a patently false statement.

Easily debunked nonsense: “Surge in appreciation of exercise and activity during lockdown” “People have turned to cycling and walking to keep active outdoors during the coronavirus (Covid-19) crisis, with 63% of people across the first six weeks of lockdown saying exercise is important for their mental health.” https://www.sportengland.org/news/surge-appreciation-exercise-and-activity-during-lockdown#:~:text=People have turned to cycling,important for their mental health.

I am aware of your desire, which you put into practice, of choosing to portray things as you would like them to be rather than as they actually are. Confirming that you know the reality does not excuse you misrepresenting it, rather it underscores your studied dishonesty.

She’s resigned from the Tory Party, the attack dogs can now go after her.

There’s no such thing as ‘Wuflu’. So obviously your whole post is a misrepresentation of fact.

Because of course some people have brains that are impervious to what they see, hear and read.

Arguably one of the least newsworthy events to occur in a British nightclub toilet.

Perhaps the most twisted post I’ve ever read on this forum.

Drunk Yorkshireman trolls The Telegraph.

Everyone using social media is influenced by what is presented to them on the platforms they use.

RIP. Five children by an entirely unnecessary medical procedure, the demand for which is driven by the promotion for profit of cosmetic surgery. Undoubtedly an outcome that is left to the NHS to deal with. As so often, privatized profits, socialized costs.

Opinions differ. It’s a fair amount for something a lot more toxic and hurtful than ‘hurty words’.

‘Anti-Speechers’? Jones was lying for profit. Those his lies harmed have won a court settlement against him for the harm he caused them. Lies have consequences, Jones is now in the receiving end of the consequences of his lies. It’s rather fitting he should be.

To be fair, I don’t think Trump has ever read that particular book. Or for that matter, any book.

Nobody removed Jones’ free speech. He used it very effectively to lie for profit causing real harm to those he targeted. Now he’s getting some justice.

Quite the contrary, there were plenty of options other than sitting at home. My favorite sport enjoyed a boom, the healthy choice of exercise and fresh air was too good for many to miss. https://www.bbc.com/future/bespoke/made-on-earth/the-great-bicycle-boom-of-2020.html

Yes you are. You’re almost in cut a paste territory.

“Grossly offensive” Jonny, in breach of the law. I’ve linked the actual clause of the actual law, you should appraise yourself if it. “Strawman” as in portraying grossly offensive posts in breach of the law as “A fancy way of saying he was jailed for being rude.” No Jonny, he was being grossly offensive in breach of the law.

Now you’re trolling. Not a shred of evidence from you that he did not commit the crime he admitted and was convicted for.

Odd thing to say given you have been presented with the actual offense your martyr committed, as reported by the Crown Prosecution Service and you have also been presented with the actual law and clause of the law that he breached. My apologies that reality isn’t aligned with your misrepresentation of the facts of the case for which a formal CPS report has been provided.

Less than three months into a new Government is obviously too soon to determine if they are going to live up to manifesto promises. The Government hasn’t yet delivered its first budget.

He wasn’t being ‘offensive’ he was being ‘grossly offensive’ to an extent that breached 127(1)(a) and (3) of the Communications Act 2003. Lots of people criticize Government policy, but they don’t engage in racially aggravated breaches of the law. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4gdww5lx2vo.amp Off you go again on your Muslim thing. Off you go again on your Edwards thing. Off you go again on your two tier Starmer thing. Are you aware that Starmer does not control police investigations, court verdicts, and court sentencing? Or is it something else you are willfully ignorant of?!

No convicted for breach of 127(1)(a) and (3) of the Communications Act 2003, that’s ‘ criminal behavior’. Short form ‘for breaking the law’. You might find the actual law instructive: “127Improper use of public electronic communications network (1)A person is guilty of an offence if he— (a)sends by means of a public electronic communications network a message or other matter that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; “ “3)A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable, on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or to both.” He admitted his guilt, said he got caught up following the mob. (never wise that following the mob thing). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/section/127 I see your claims of ‘criticizing Government policy’ have evaporated.