Jump to content

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    29,774
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Chomper Higgot

  1. The FBI do not ‘need to obtain permission [from the AG] before conducting raids’. Once again you let loose the fact of your lack of understanding what it is you are talking about. I suggest you stop digging.
  2. Still walking back your initial ill informed post. Though it’s not all bad news, you’ve demonstrated you can be corrected even if you struggle when it comes to admitting you were wrong.
  3. I’m good with raid. FBI raid in pursuance with a lawfully issued search warrant.
  4. Don’t waste your time. He’s never going to believe anything that the FBI turn up, not evidence, not indictments, not guilty verdicts. He’s an example of Trump’s 5th Avenue witnesses.
  5. Trump supporter histrionics gets picked up by internet analytics.
  6. Nobody who is not a Trump supporter is upset by this, and as I say many of those who are upset by it don’t have a vote anyway.
  7. Arguably overt interference in a criminal investigation.
  8. There aren’t enough Trump supporters to worry about and they are in any case always angry always believing anything Trump tells them. As he said himself, ‘he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue’. Forget about Trump’s supporters, many of whom don’t have a vote. It’s swing voters and middle America that will decide the next election.
  9. No you were not,. Stop gaslighting, own your own posts or be owned by them:
  10. Some Democrats, others have observed Garland’s past record of conducting thorough , leak proof and effective criminal investigations of large coordinated criminal enterprises.
  11. Of course the FBI ran this by Garland, it’s public knowledge that the DoJ are themselves investigating Trump. All evidence of the FBI and the DoJ being cautious and professional.
  12. Oh I see, having made an unequivocally ill informed post, and been called out for not knowing what you are talking about, you do some internet searching and come back with a second bite of the sour cherry. The nonsense of your first post remains. You’ve confirmed you can do a search for facts, albeit after first having embarrassed yourself by posting nonsense you should have checked before hitting the send button.
  13. Scott Perry is now feeling the FBI lurv: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-scott-perry-fbi-phone-b2141916.html?amp
  14. Trump appointees fall into two groups. Those he later vilified and those facing criminal investigation/prosecution/prison time.
  15. As I said earlier, somebody pointed at the safe and handed the FBI what they needed to get a warrant to bust the safe open.
  16. The FBI boss is Director Christopher A Wray, he was appointed by Donald Trump, he’s a member of the Republican Party. Once again you let loose the fact you don’t have a clue what you are talking about. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_A._Wray
  17. The topic of this thread would be a good place to start.
  18. Biden is not the subject of a no-knock search warrant, and not the subject of the no-knock search warrant that is the topic of this thread.
  19. It’s an interesting possibility. How’s Lindsey Graham taking the news?
  20. Don’t let the opportunity for a bit of off off topic ageism pass you by.
  21. The person who told the FBI to look in the safe. Identifying such a very specific place to search and what to find there was not the handy work of the ‘National Archive’.
  22. I wonder if Trump has twigged that somebody close to him is grassing him up?
×
×
  • Create New...