Chomper Higgot

Orange suits her.

And Republican witnesses.

It cuts both ways.

Nobody is denying Trump the assistance of counsel for his defense. Though he does have a habit of selecting counsel barely able to do the job.

He might as well just come out and say it, he believes himself to be above the law and should never be called to answer for his actions. Drag the spoiled brat into court on the date already set, kicking and screaming if necessary.

27 to 33 years in the slammer is fair. Seditious conspiracy is a serious crime. They’ll be broken old men by time they see freedom again, if they make it that long. Good enough.

You ask what the implication is and then launch into accusations of conspiracy and corruption.

Just follow the law: https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-628-speedy-trial-act-1974 And the Sixth Amendment: ”In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed…..

LOL

22 years is fair. She clearly intended harm, targeted the then President and putting all in the delivery postal chain at risk.

If you state a number, it’s for you to demonstrate that number is correct or provide a link to a credible source for that number. You don’t get to make claims then assert its for others to prove you wrong.

OK so you were wrong. Facebook constitutes a great deal more of the internet than you baselessly assumed.

There’s nothing subjective about what constitutes a lie.

Excellent

Sad loss, cracking bloke. RIP

I provided a link to back my argument. Can you do likewise?

Facebook accounts for over 17% of website visits: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/software/website-statistics/

‘Information’ sounds innocuous. Facebook removing ‘lies’, is not simply ‘censorship’.

There’s certainly bias. Arguably the most significant technological revolution in human history and you choose to ask it questions rooted in rightwing grievances.

Here’s the quote you included in an earlier post you made: m Read the whole of that paragraph you quoted: “ The UK paid France to build a detention center and deploy 500 French security officers to enable faster detection of attempted crossings’ Provided the French build a detention center and deploy 500 French security officers to enable faster detection of attempted crossings, then he French have done what was asked and paid for.

Biden-economics creating jobs for Americans across all America, not simply stuffing the pockets of the hyper wealthy.

I never claimed it to be my truth. Thanks for the ad hominem.

I’m not blaming anyone’s country. I am holding the British Government accountable for its own failures, and that failure, indeed this thread, has nothing at all to do with your ‘socialism’ trolling. Here’s a clue:

I have no reason to believe they are deliberately allowing anyone into boats. Perhaps they are unable to stop people getting into boats. Now who was it that made a promise to put a stop to this and why do you avoid holding them responsible for their failure?

I think you just demonstrated the truth of Colbert’s observation.