Chomper Higgot

Then you’ll not have a problem linking them and explaining what you think they are saying.

No, but are they admissible? If my laptop went missing for months, was handled by countless people and then ‘stuff’ was found on its hard drive I’d be making to obvious observation that the laptop was handled by countless people. Don’t tell me you wouldn’t make the same observation if it were you. In the case of the subject laptop, numbers of these people were affiliated with Trump and or the Republican Party. I smell a lot of accusation confession going on.

Evidence?

And when legionnaire bacteria was discovered one might expect it to be dealt with before transferring people into the barge: https://www.messengernewspapers.co.uk/news/national/23720228.council-says-home-office-contractors-told-legionella-day-barge-transfer/

I’ll cut out the ‘could be’ and rely on multiple court rulings that there was no election fraud. AKA lies.

Well they can say it, but they never bring any credible evidence that any court will accept. AKA lies.

Let’s stick with what we know. Labour are not in Government, nor are they the topic of discussion. This ‘immigrant barge’ Hokey Cokey, is a failure of the current Government’s own making, at tax payers expense and Government chum’s profit. You shouting ‘Labour’ does not alter any of that.

Nice unverifiable story.

Oh, the countries people flee from. What an aspiration for a nation to aim for.

That’s a wild claim. Do you have evidence of a country failing to control illegal immigration until it removed itself from the 1948 Declaration of Human Rights.

Nobody is claiming it is.

Someone pointing a gun at a law enforcement officer is a credible threat to the law enforcement officer.

Because people known to be in possession of fire arms who are making threats of violence are zero threat to officers issuing warrants.

Nonsense. The immigrants are indisputably ‘asylum seekers’, refer Government statements in link attached. UK law requires their claim for asylum be reviewed. Nobody objects to bogus asylum seekers being deported. The Government’s failure to clear asylum applications is the reason bogus asylum seekers remain in the UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/asylum-accommodation-factsheets/factsheet-asylum-accommodation-on-a-vessel-in-portland-port

You the immigrants in, you put the immigrants out. In, out, in, out, shake it all about You do the Hokey Cokey and pass tax payers money around . That’s what it’s all about. Oh the Hokey Cokey. Oh the Hokey Cokey Oh the Hokey Cokey. Laws bent, rules stretched, ra ra ra.

The old guy making violent threats with a gun in his hand is obviously not the only one with his finger on a trigger.

Nobody who is intentionally pointing a gun at someone else is ‘harmless’.

Pure conspiracy garbage. Think something up, anything you want, then claim it possible because you’ve not seen evidence to refute the garbage you yourself dreamed up.

But still able to pull a trigger.

CH knows nothing of the sort.

The FBI seem to have taken the risk of an armed response from the subject of their lawfully warranted search seriously. They might not have had WACO in mind but I suspect the possibility of dangerous wacko was a consideration.

I am not. I’m pointing out the absurdity of the argument made in the post I was responding to. Don’t point guns at law enforcement officers seems to be the best advice. Doing so risks deadly consequences.

Could he pull a trigger?

The farce continues. Honestly, the ability of this Government to waste tax payers money on crackpot schemes that fail at the first hurdle never ceases to astound me. Apart from the waste, grandstanding a claimed solution to a problem of the Government’s own making, which then turns out to be an incompetent mess.

What you claim to be your ‘evidence’ is nothing g of the sort. If you wish to make statements and attribute them to my past posts you need to link to those posts. Inventing points of view for other members is not evidence of their views.