Chomper Higgot

All that testimony under oath from Republicans within Trump’s administration, even Trump’s own daughter giving evidence against her father’s lies, yes awfully ‘one sided’. Let’s take the evidence to a criminal court and see how it goes.

Anybody paying attention to the Jan 6 hearings will understand how near the US came to losing its democracy.

The proposals in this bill are excellent. Well done those who drafted the bill, now get it passed without being watered down.

If they are not in the UK how are they claiming benefits? Or is your ‘broad negative stereotyped generalization wrt to foreigners from the EU’ getting in the way of you working that out?

But you nearly doubled the EU citizens and halved the Indian Pakistani population.

I’m not sure where you are getting your numbers from. There are 1.45Million people of Indian ethnicity in the UK and almost 1.2 million people of Pakistani ethnicity: The ‘best estimate’ for the number of EU citizens in the UK is 3.5 million. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Indians https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Pakistanis https://blog.ons.gov.uk/2021/07/02/are-there-really-6m-eu-citizens-living-in-the-uk/amp/

You might want to try and quickly delete the link you provided before someone fixes it in a quote…. Oops, too late. Here’s the verdict provided in the link you so kindly posted: “WHAT WAS CLAIMED Under the Geneva Convention refugees should seek refuge in the first safe country they come to. OUR VERDICT Incorrect. The UN Refugee Convention does not make this requirement of refugees, and UK case law supports this interpretation. Refugees can legitimately make a claim for asylum in the UK after passing through other “safe” countries.” The other two claims addressed in your link also make interesting reading. Thank you so much for sharing,

Link to that clause within law please.

To be absolutely correct, if their application for asylum is rejected they become ‘’failed asylum seekers’ and are justly liable for deportation within the law.

Perhaps because the racists and bigots in the UK make the most noise. It’s of course wrong to judge a nation by the behaviour and language of a few, but if that ‘hate filled few’ make the most noise, it’s their behaviour and language that give the biggest impression. As I said earlier most Brits do not dislike foreigners, far from it. However, it is not hard to see why an outsider looking in might think otherwise.

And once they make a claim for asylum they are legal ‘Asylum Seekers’.

In general you are correct, British people in general don’t dislike foreigners. However very many British people do dislike foreigners.

The people the Government tried to deport to Rwanda are recognized by the British Government as ‘Asylum Seekers’, the Government’s ‘Rwanda scheme’ claims that the people being deported will have their claim for asylum examined while they are in Rwanda. These people are not ‘illegal immigrants’.

I’ve provided a link that demonstrates the statement I made, you know, the one you replied to. Here’s my post again: And here (again) is the link that demonstrates my statement is correct: https://www.statista.com/statistics/287278/uk-trade-union-wage-premium/ Now a question to you if I may: Are you in favour of working people receiving pay levels that enable them to live without welfare subsidies or, as increasing numbers of UK working families now do, relying on food banks?

https://www.statista.com/statistics/287278/uk-trade-union-wage-premium/

Unionized workers earn considerably more than those who are not in a union and I’m all in favour of working people receiving pay levels that enable them to live without welfare subsidies or, as increasing numbers of UK working families now do, relying on food banks. I agree, it’s time for BJ ti be replaced, along with the whole of his government.

Plus millions of people in work earning low wages and unable to pay for anything beyond absolute essentials, with no excess to drive ‘consumer economy gains’. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9209/ Plus rising personal debts. https://www.moneyexpert.com/news/uk-personal-debt-levels-continue-rise/

The UK left the Dublin as part of the ‘Brexit Gains’. There is no ‘Dublin Agreement’ applicable to migrants traveling through any EU nation to the UK. A Brexit home goal.

“The Trump campaign sent “millions” of emails to Trump supporters about how they needed to “step up” to protect election integrity, according to the Jan. 6 committee.” Emails are a record. “The money would go to the so-called the “Official Election Defense Fund” — which doesn’t appear to have actually existed, according to testimony.” Easily tested by criminal investigation, because of course if the Election Defense Fund did exist there will be formal records to prove it existed. “The fund — which, again, did not actually exist — raised $250 million, most of which did not go to election litigation, but to Trump’s newly created Save America PAC. The PAC then made contributions to Mark Meadows’ charity, to a conservative organization employing former Trump staffers, to the Trump Hotel Collection, and to the company that organized the rally that preceded the attack on the Capitol last Jan. 6.” All of which has a paper trail. 941. 18 U.S.C. 1343—ELEMENTS OF WIRE FRAUD.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-fundraising-scam-jan-6-hearing-1367359/amp/

Trump supporters want evidence, well here you go: Recorded FACT Trump raised funds on the bases of ‘the big lie’ which he stated while asking for donations would be used to fight ‘the big steal. Recorded and documented FACT: He then pocketed the money, around $250,000,000 of it. Simple, easily proven fraud. Indictable as a Federal offense. Indictable as a State offense in any of the States in which the fraud took place (any State where a Trump supporter made a donation). Fraud, wire Fraud, Tax Evasion and even Consumer Fraud. With a paper trail!

You obviously do not understand the evidential weight of sworn testimony. Stay tuned to the hearings and the following DoJ investigation.

And yet the Democrats won by over 7 million votes. Harris nailed Kavanaugh with a question that will come back if the Democrats take both houses in the mid-terms.

Yes they did, but they did not teach Latin to my auto spell checker.

They are not ‘US Fighters’ they are Americans who joined the Ukrainian army.