Chomper Higgot

There’s a list, options, a wide field of experience. Not a one ‘man’ party.

It’s more about the continual criminality of your boy. He’s the defendant in 34 indictments and the subject of three criminal investigations, in chronological order: 1. Georgia Election Rigging - we’ve seen and heard evidence supportive of the investigation. 2. His part in the J6 insurrection - we’ve seen and heard evidence supportive of the investigation. 3. Retention and concealment of Classified Documents.- we’ve seen and heard evidence supportive of the investigation. Since the crimes preceded the investigations, I look forward to you providing evidence that these crimes were committed to keep Trump out of office.

Always a conspiracy. Any names of these ‘certain people’?

2020 demonstrated they don’t exist ( within the electorate) in sufficient numbers to effect the outcome of an election.

He also voted against the DOJ in an appeal that revealed the participation of his wife in the planning of the insurrection.

It’s another one of those rightwing accusations that turn out to be confessions.

Get this done, then bring on the ‘Class Actions’ for anti-vaccine misinformation.

The day of judgement hasn’t arrived yet, but Justice is now in process. I don’t mind waiting a little longer, after-all, there are other indictments on the horizon. We have a busy year of Justice ahead of us.

I look forward to your response when the Jury does indeed pass down their verdict.

Where do you get this nonsense?

Perhaps they wanted to use the far more advanced modern technologies, they certainly have different funding and mission objectives: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program

we don’t mind waiting so long as it’s done right.

Here we see why.

New systems, new test regime. Just like when they build a new aircraft, they test it before putting it into service.

And do access.

The main takeaway is nobody needs spend anytime pondering the idea whether or not a former POTUS may be indicted for crimes. Georgia, DOJ are you paying attention? [Rhetorical question].

Including Pence.

I think he’s on the trajectory of denial as Justice proceeds. The trajectory of denial amongst Trump supporters that I predicted at the beginning of Trump’s investigations and that some took exception to. And yet, here we are. The Defendant’ supporters will never accept the Defendant being held accountable under the law.

You are indeed missing something. Putins illegal war and invasion of a sovereign nation. Now what was it you were saying about existing treaties?

Here’s a juicy bit. The NY DA statement of facts mentions hush money payments to three women. The existence of these three affairs has been reported before but always publicly denied by the Defendant (AKA Donald Trump). Let’s see how the Defendant responds when questioned about these three alleged affairs when on the stand and under oath. It’s going to be a bit of a head challenge for his Bible Bashing followers, and perhaps a bit of a gift to Melania.

The statement of facts also refers to Weisselberg and David Pecker. Also keep in mind Cohen presented call recordings relating to the pay off, these are a matter of court record.

Desperation, go after the wives and daughters.

You allege the NYDA has committed fraud, but present no evidence. Trump’s lawyers have stated they will file a motion to dismiss, if you have evidence to back your assertion send it ASAP, they need all the help they can get.

34 felony indictments and you want more. Don’t worry, Georgia DA and the DOJ are on it.

Count me as a believer. But then I was never one of those that believed Trump (AKA The Defendant) would ever be indicted.