Jump to content

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    31,916
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Chomper Higgot

  1. Irrelevant, once in the UK they are subject to and have the protections of UK law. Entering the UK to seek asylum is not illegal.
  2. Entering the UK to seek asylum is not illegal. Do you agree with everyone, including the Government being held accountable to the law?
  3. Nothing at all if it’s where you choose to go. But the UK Government must obey the law and may not unlawfully deport people to Rawanda, though as demonstrated in the High Court that was the Government’s intention.
  4. It seems Charles was on to something. A number of individuals have successfully defeated the Government’s attempt to deport them to Rawanda and in doing so demonstrated beyond doubt that the Government was in their case acting unlawfully. So we have it demonstrated in the High Court that without the assistance of NGO’s the Government was prepared to, and in the process of, deporting people out with their legal rights. Charles was right, this is appalling.
  5. Hot on the heals of Tory MP Lee Anderson’s assertion that the poor need to be taught how they can cook 30p nourishing meals.
  6. Perhaps you could tell what you believe is being done to the USA right now that is damaging?
  7. But where are the venomous protestations and coming from? The outrage, oh so much outrage.
  8. Because like Charles, you were not elected, unlike Charles you posted your comments online, Charles made his comments in private.
  9. Thank you, but actually it only needed to be one to prove the fallacy I was addressing. And there’s more to come.
  10. The hearings will not convince hardline pro-Trump of anything, they will cement the views of those who oppose Trump but neither of these groups will decide the next election. The target audience is the middle between these two opposed groups. Revealing to this large and electorally important body of the public what happened on Jan 6, who organized, funded the attack, who was responsible from top to bottom. Importantly explaining, with evidence, that this was an organized, funded seditious attack on the Democracy of the United States. People with their thumbs stuffed in their ears while screaming to drown out truth and facts don’t matter, they aren’t going to listen, they don’t care, they are offended by the exposure of the lies they’ve swallowed and they are far out numbered by the moderate middle.
  11. I see you slipped a ‘threatening the Vice President’ in there. Conspiracy to sedition does not necessarily require a threat to the Vice President. The courts have accepted the guilty pleas on ‘Seditious Conspiracy’ of two ‘Oath Keepers’. Brian Ulrich and Joshua James now await sentencing. More to come, stay tuned. Cheers!
  12. My guess is just the ones that aided and abetted the insurrection. Stay tuned, all will be revealed.
  13. Not just the President. Members of Congress and the Senate are also sworn to uphold the US Constitution and it’s enemies, against all enemies foreign and domestic. So who knew what and when did they know it. Let’s start with those begging for pardons.
  14. So in the event that evidence is produced that demonstrates Trump knew but failed to act your position is?
  15. I’ll make a punt. Anyone who’s combined asset and liabilities are a net positive is wealthier than Donald Trump. His wife is not working he topic of discussion, but she’s certainly not stunning.
  16. The fanatical Trump supporters heard it loud and clear, then went directly to the Capitol to attempt a violent overthrow of the lawful democratic process of declaring the election result.
  17. Refer televised hearings. And the public record: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/first-trial-of-capitol-rioters-ends-with-conviction-all-counts https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/apr/29/us-capitol-attack-oath-keeper-guilty-seditious-conspiracy
×
×
  • Create New...
""