Chomper Higgot

Are the alleged crimes serious? Is there evidence of the crimes having been committed? If the answer to those two questions is yes and yes, then on what basis do you claim the charges are ‘Trumped up to get political opponents silenced’ Not taking allegations of sexual misconduct by an adult towards minors, and in the face of an open confession by the perp, seriously needs some explanation. It’s certainly not a position anyone I choose to associate with would ever take.

FOX have yet to face the consequences of lying to the court, the Court’s appointed Special Master is still ‘Special Mastering’.

So Alexander Viktorovich Ionov is mixed up in this. He’s also been involved in finding white nationalist extremism in the US and US Cessation Groups. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Viktorovich_Ionov

Lies and misinformation are not perspective.

Except: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/12/02/tech/twitter-hate-speech/index.html

Perhaps, given the topic of discussion, we should be asking who’s funding the anthropomorphic climate change deniers.

You’d first have to demonstrate the truth of your implied conspiracy.

Fame for all the wrong reasons. But ‘Pro-Russian’ serving in the US Military, methinks there’s a problem we need to be knowing about.

Has he claimed to have invented AI yet?

All fine and dandy, until it gets to the bit where they need to present evidence to a Grand Jury. Stick with the Comey Clown Show, it is at least entertaining .

The allegations against Trump are called criminal indictments passed down by a Grand Jury, they are now the subject of criminal prosecution. The ‘allegations’ against Biden are completely unsubstantiated. There’s a difference.

So long as I don’t have to hold my breath.

Allegations without evidence.

None of this is smoke, it’s all hot air from Comer. Accusations of crimes need evidence, he has no evidence of crimes that’s why he uses the terms ‘may have’, ‘possible’ and other such mealy-mouthed nonsense.

And you can provide examples?

FOX News, that organization that admitted in court to lying and even then went on to lie before the court. Is that where you go for your ‘Facts’?

“The only strong evidence Joe wasn't involved was” You what??? It doesn’t work like that. If you are going to accuse someone of a crime you need evidence they committed a crime, they don’t need to provide evidence they did not.

Try this for size. Banks notify international interbank transactions above $10,000, I make a number of such transactions per year. Each is notified as a ‘potential criminal transaction’ on the basis of the legal requirement to report, not on the basis of the transaction being a crime - The banks do not themselves investigate. “Financial institutions and money transfer providers are obligated to report international transfers that exceed $10,000.” https://www.bossrevolution.com/en-us/blog/international-money-transfer-laws So calm down, Comer and Murdoch’s NY Post mischaracterizing normal bank reporting might be the kind of nonsense you are eager to swallow but it is not evidence of any crimes.

The only surprise here is a Republican Governor acting to cut out the rot in his own Party. Hat’s off to Gov. Kevin Stitt for acting on this.

It’s that Republican accusation/confession thing again.

If a predatory pervert gets accused of other crimes, I’m not inclined to be the least bit concerned.

That’s a very thin line of defense, more the point not a behaviour many feel the need to defend.

OK, that’s the mistakes. Now let’s deal with the Criminal actions.

The topic is “Climate-sceptic accounts surge after Elon Musk’s Twitter takeover”

There was me thinking it was that special kind of attention some men reserve for intelligent, articulate women who have the temerity to express their opinion.