Chomper Higgot

Why would anyone in NI want to change the NI Protocol, the economy of NI is out performing that of the rest of the UK: https://www.ft.com/content/3b5059c4-4ef1-44d1-ae1f-43a875efb7ca Perhaps Rees Mogg could gather a few ‘Brexit Opportunity’ hints from the province, or would doing so upset his chums in the ERG.

The only side wanting a change is the unionists, and they lost the election. Brexit is done, the ink is dry. Pull together now old chap, make it work…. and all that.

Off you go then. Your two comments will still be plainly contradictory nonsense when you return.

It’s not difficult at all, his government negotiated the terms of a treaty then he signed the treaty. He then made a big fuss about having got Brexit done. Now he wants to unilaterally break the treaty his own government negotiated and he himself signed. What an utterly shameless shambles.

So what was this nonsense about then?

I thought Brexit was done?

The UK can make deals with as many individual US States as it wishes, none will be exempt from US Customs controls, levies and quotas.

What’s this ‘Soft Insurrection’ nonsense, there is no such thing. Now let’s get back to the real insurrection, the attempted overthrow of the election result by violent force, it was live on TV - remember!

the committee is ‘Legitimate’, you need to get over this fact.

The individual States don’t determine import rights or import duties. Moreover, any deal the US offers the Uk will be structured to meet the objectives of US businesses, the leaders of which understand that the weak position the UK has put itself in is an opportunity to enforce terms that are very positive for US businesses regardless of the impact on the UK economy/society. But don’t fret, this isn’t going to happen just yet, the UK must first do as it is told wrt to Ireland.

People who oppose this he leader of a political party are not traitors to the nation. Well not in in the UK they aren’t, or at least not yet in the UK they are not.

Rail workers observed what happened to the ferry workers and decided they’re not up for the same treatment.

Yes, the Russian exit from Ukraine.

Who cares, so long as the sharp end is delivered to the invading army and other hired killers?!

This war started with Putin ordering the invasion of the sovereign state of Ukraine. Let’s not forget that.

Zelensky did not choose war, that was Putin, he ordered the unprovoked invasion of the sovereign state of Ukraine. Putin is the aggressor.

Objecting to Putin’s unprovoked war of aggression against the sovereign state of Ukraine and the atrocities committed by Putin’s army and hired killers is not hatred of Russia? As for Putin, what’s not to hate? Oh, and there is no WW3, that’s a Kremlin scare tactic that relies on people like yourself to keep it in circulation.

So you don’t like being reminded that Zalensky is the democratically elected leader of a sovereign nation? Or is it you don’t like being called out for repeating Kremlin propaganda? Or both?

Yet more pro-Putin talking points. Zelensky is the democratically elected leader of a sovereign nation that has been invaded by a viscous tyrant. Nothing at all to do with that Biden hate thing of yours.

Nonsense. Differences of opinion are not evidence of ‘a shameful front’ or ‘cracks’. Europeans understand the consequences of appeasing an aggressive tyrant, Kremlin lead propaganda doesn’t disguise that fact.

Trump’s hand picked DoJ and 62 Court rulings and an over 7,000,000 vote majority disagree with you.

we can all be thankful that ‘The Steal’ was indeed stopped.

2022 is turning out to be a good year for Justice, and its still only June.

It doesn’t matter, the lockdown rules were different at the time of Starmer’s work related meal. The police did decide, then a Tory MP made a second complaint about the same incident, the outcome will be the same.

And Starmer has stated that if he has broken the law he will resign. Reaffirming his commitment to standards in public office. The faux report against Starmer, aimed at distracting from Johnson’s multiple counts of law breaking, handed Starmer an opportunity to provide a clear example of why he, not Johnson, is fit for office.