Chomper Higgot

The people the Government tried to deport to Rwanda are recognized by the British Government as ‘Asylum Seekers’, the Government’s ‘Rwanda scheme’ claims that the people being deported will have their claim for asylum examined while they are in Rwanda. These people are not ‘illegal immigrants’.

I’ve provided a link that demonstrates the statement I made, you know, the one you replied to. Here’s my post again: And here (again) is the link that demonstrates my statement is correct: https://www.statista.com/statistics/287278/uk-trade-union-wage-premium/ Now a question to you if I may: Are you in favour of working people receiving pay levels that enable them to live without welfare subsidies or, as increasing numbers of UK working families now do, relying on food banks?

https://www.statista.com/statistics/287278/uk-trade-union-wage-premium/

Unionized workers earn considerably more than those who are not in a union and I’m all in favour of working people receiving pay levels that enable them to live without welfare subsidies or, as increasing numbers of UK working families now do, relying on food banks. I agree, it’s time for BJ ti be replaced, along with the whole of his government.

Plus millions of people in work earning low wages and unable to pay for anything beyond absolute essentials, with no excess to drive ‘consumer economy gains’. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9209/ Plus rising personal debts. https://www.moneyexpert.com/news/uk-personal-debt-levels-continue-rise/

The UK left the Dublin as part of the ‘Brexit Gains’. There is no ‘Dublin Agreement’ applicable to migrants traveling through any EU nation to the UK. A Brexit home goal.

“The Trump campaign sent “millions” of emails to Trump supporters about how they needed to “step up” to protect election integrity, according to the Jan. 6 committee.” Emails are a record. “The money would go to the so-called the “Official Election Defense Fund” — which doesn’t appear to have actually existed, according to testimony.” Easily tested by criminal investigation, because of course if the Election Defense Fund did exist there will be formal records to prove it existed. “The fund — which, again, did not actually exist — raised $250 million, most of which did not go to election litigation, but to Trump’s newly created Save America PAC. The PAC then made contributions to Mark Meadows’ charity, to a conservative organization employing former Trump staffers, to the Trump Hotel Collection, and to the company that organized the rally that preceded the attack on the Capitol last Jan. 6.” All of which has a paper trail. 941. 18 U.S.C. 1343—ELEMENTS OF WIRE FRAUD.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-fundraising-scam-jan-6-hearing-1367359/amp/

Trump supporters want evidence, well here you go: Recorded FACT Trump raised funds on the bases of ‘the big lie’ which he stated while asking for donations would be used to fight ‘the big steal. Recorded and documented FACT: He then pocketed the money, around $250,000,000 of it. Simple, easily proven fraud. Indictable as a Federal offense. Indictable as a State offense in any of the States in which the fraud took place (any State where a Trump supporter made a donation). Fraud, wire Fraud, Tax Evasion and even Consumer Fraud. With a paper trail!

You obviously do not understand the evidential weight of sworn testimony. Stay tuned to the hearings and the following DoJ investigation.

And yet the Democrats won by over 7 million votes. Harris nailed Kavanaugh with a question that will come back if the Democrats take both houses in the mid-terms.

Yes they did, but they did not teach Latin to my auto spell checker.

They are not ‘US Fighters’ they are Americans who joined the Ukrainian army.

The Government may not infringe your human rights.

I just did.

The Government may not infringe your human rights.

Oh look; https://www.lawsociety.ie/News/News/Stories/brexit-human-rights-and-the-good-friday-agreement

That’s is not what ‘magna carta’ says, if you had ever read ‘magna carta’ you would know that.

You’ve read ‘magna carta’ haven’t you? Do remember the bit about forbidding banishment overseas?

Have we got to the bit where supporters of this ‘appalling’ policy are baying in support of the Government stripping them of the protections they themselves enjoy from the ECHR?

I don’t think your arrest record is the subject of discussion.

You’re still waiting for the the load.

They can only do so in compliance with the law. Government are not above the law.

The Government enact an ill conceived failing policy. It’s the Government’s fault.

Why would an Afghani in Kabul be talking to a Ukrainian about UK council house waiting lists? That doesn’t make any sense at all.