Chomper Higgot

We know you can’t see the similarities, we got that.

You need to brush up on the facts of primate behaviour.

A gross misrepresentation of the leftwing views on inner city schooling. Have another go and think about funding (for schools, not tax cuts for the hyper wealthy).

You might want to research how it was that singling out a minority group escalated into crimes against humanity and how the question came to be asked ‘Why didn’t anyone speak up against this before it was too late?’.

BBC Scores a home goal: https://www.theguardian.com/media/live/2023/mar/11/bbc-gary-lineker-match-of-the-day-alex-scott-latest-reaction-news

And so?

Wonderful stuff, sell the rights.

You haven’t provided evidence that the increase in channel crossings has anything to do with Merkel’s refugee policies. Please have a go, I could do with the amusement.

That’s not a rabbit hole you’ve gone down, it’s a warren

Well there was a time, like for most of recorded history, when the UK was not the UK.

If you can’t back up an assertion of Gary Lineker being a socialist you should not make the assertion. That’s how honest, good faith debate works.

I’m waiting for you to back up your assertion that Lineker is a socialist. You made the claim, you back it up.

If!

No body has proven he evaded taxes. Perhaps we should have a thread on that.

“ So what he has done appears to be clear tax evasion” I think you mean ‘allegedly. Snd what does this allegation have to do with the topic under discussion?

We’re is your evidence that Gary Lineker is a socialist?

Your claim that Lineker is a true socialist. I’ve asked you if he has ever made a statement that he’s a socialist and if so do you have a link. Has he, do you have a link or are you engaging in a baseless ad hominem?

Clearly nothing to put on your spoon.

Or so it is alleged. Incidentally, has Gary Lineker ever claimed to be a socialist, let alone a true socialist. Do you have a link to that?

Then you will have no problem providing the clause number.

Running out of arguments you go straight to the ad hominem. We got it already, you don’t like Gary Lineker.

Read the rules you posted, can’t see anything that prevents Lineker offering his personal opinions on his personal social media account. If you believe such a clause exists, please identify it the rules you posted.

This is what he actually said: ”“An immeasurably cruel policy directed at the most vulnerable people in language that is not dissimilar to that used by Germany in the 30s.”” He didn’t liken the UK Government to Nazi Germany, he remarked that “ in language that is not dissimilar to that used by Germany in the 30s.” The response, censor Lineker. I mean we can’t have people criticizing the language the Government chooses to use can we.

Hysterical you say. Invaded you say.

Lineker’s remarks were made on his own personal social media account. Nothing to do with anybody’s taxes.