Chomper Higgot

More than a bit oversized. Who cares, it’s only tax payer’s money.

A rather poor attempt at dragging your assumptions regarding the totally irrelevant nationality of other posters into discussion. Back to topic please.

Why would I pretend such a thing? Or, more precisely, why do you feel the need to suggest I would pretend such a thing?!

Even if it contained clauses to permit deporting refugees, since Brexit the UK is not a party to the Dublin Agreement.

I recommend you read Mrs Beeton’s recipe for Jugged Hare.

Once in the UK they are the UK’s responsibility, under UK law. This has always been the case.

If you are going to claim ‘bigger and better’ then shape and size absolutely do matter.

It seems the Government itself has taken steps to avoid confirmation on the matter: https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/minister-avoids-confirming-if-top-legal-advisor-was-consulted-on-northern-ireland-protocol-legislation

Correct: ” Article 46 Provisions of internal law regarding competence to conclude treaties 1.A State may not invoke the fact that its consent to be bound by a treaty has been expressed in violation of a provision of its internal law regarding competence to conclude treaties as invalidating its consent unless that violation was manifest and concerned a rule of its internal law of fundamental importance. 2.A violation is manifest if it would be objectively evident to any State conducting itself in the matter in accordance with normal practice and in good faith.”

Correct. Vienna Convention, Article 27.

Vienna Convention Article 27 Internal law and observance of treaties A party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty.

EU laws are enacted by votes in the representative governments of each individual state.

Can you give us an example of one of these ‘bigger and better deals’?

Who created this mess I wonder?

At nowhere near the current numbers, and at that time the UK and French were cooperating. Johnson and Patel has actively sought to aggravate what non binding cooperation remained after Brexit.

Don’t expect help with that, the UK has withdrawn from the Dublin Agreement.

Brexit removed the UK from the Dublin Agreement. Don’t tell me to stop point out facts you don’t like hearing. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59369179.amp And let’s not forget ‘Poject Fear’: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-illegal-immigration-free-movement-eu-leave-a8915816.html?amp Home Goal!

The legal basis for doing so is?

Why would they need to, the migrants are passing through France.

I was pointing out your statement wrt not ‘knowing the legalities of it’.

If the migrants were passing through the UK heading to another country, would you be insisting that the UK authorities act to stop them leaving the UK? The French Government were bound by the Dublin Agreement to do exactly what you want them to do, but then the UK left the Dublin Agreement when Brexit was ‘Done’. A stunning home goal!

Nothing to do with the EU.

You should acquaint yourself with the consequences of Brexit.

Not since Brexit they don’t, (Another ‘Home Goal’).

No. Unless you can find a legal basis for the French preventing people getting into boats and heading to the UK. The ‘Dublin Agreement’ would provide a legal obligation on the French but the UK ditched it as part of Brexit. Doh! “The United Kingdom withdrawal from the European Union took effect at the end of the Brexit transition period on 31 December 2020, at which point the Regulation ceased to apply to it.” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dublin_Regulation