Chomper Higgot

Or it could be, these Conservative MPs know that Johnson’s plans are against International Law.

So these EU workers were driving down wages while at the same time sponging of benefits? Or is this just another example of the baseless and derogatory views that was behind Brexit?

Frequently report during the run up to Brexit, British employers across any sector that required physical work (building/farming/fishing/forestry/infrastructure construction etc) all complained that British ‘kids’ were not applying for apprenticeships/jobs on offer. British ‘Kids’ just won’t have it.

So answer me this then. Why are members of the Tory Government arguing against their own PM that his plan to unilaterally break the NI protocol is a plan to break international law? I suspect they are looking at the law, not misinformation from the rightwing press, but of course you might have evidence to the contrary.

He could deal with ‘Law and order’…… oh…. Perhaps not.

If he got ‘Brexit Done’ why does he now want to undo that which he signed up to?

The DUP want a hard border between North and South Ireland, this is in direct conflict with the Good Friday Agreement. Neither the EU not Washington will accept dismantling of the Good Friday agreement. Johnson is playing with fire.

Perhaps not Einstein. Schrödinger's border. Sorted!

Calm down. WRT NI and the ‘NI devolved parliament’ the UK will do as Washington tells it.

What? EU customs officers are checking goods in the UK?

Why would anyone in NI want to change the NI Protocol, the economy of NI is out performing that of the rest of the UK: https://www.ft.com/content/3b5059c4-4ef1-44d1-ae1f-43a875efb7ca Perhaps Rees Mogg could gather a few ‘Brexit Opportunity’ hints from the province, or would doing so upset his chums in the ERG.

The only side wanting a change is the unionists, and they lost the election. Brexit is done, the ink is dry. Pull together now old chap, make it work…. and all that.

Off you go then. Your two comments will still be plainly contradictory nonsense when you return.

It’s not difficult at all, his government negotiated the terms of a treaty then he signed the treaty. He then made a big fuss about having got Brexit done. Now he wants to unilaterally break the treaty his own government negotiated and he himself signed. What an utterly shameless shambles.

So what was this nonsense about then?

I thought Brexit was done?

The UK can make deals with as many individual US States as it wishes, none will be exempt from US Customs controls, levies and quotas.

What’s this ‘Soft Insurrection’ nonsense, there is no such thing. Now let’s get back to the real insurrection, the attempted overthrow of the election result by violent force, it was live on TV - remember!

the committee is ‘Legitimate’, you need to get over this fact.

The individual States don’t determine import rights or import duties. Moreover, any deal the US offers the Uk will be structured to meet the objectives of US businesses, the leaders of which understand that the weak position the UK has put itself in is an opportunity to enforce terms that are very positive for US businesses regardless of the impact on the UK economy/society. But don’t fret, this isn’t going to happen just yet, the UK must first do as it is told wrt to Ireland.

People who oppose this he leader of a political party are not traitors to the nation. Well not in in the UK they aren’t, or at least not yet in the UK they are not.

Rail workers observed what happened to the ferry workers and decided they’re not up for the same treatment.

Yes, the Russian exit from Ukraine.

Who cares, so long as the sharp end is delivered to the invading army and other hired killers?!

This war started with Putin ordering the invasion of the sovereign state of Ukraine. Let’s not forget that.