LosLobo

Observing the behavior of many Trump supporters here is intriguing, especially those who seem incapable of engaging in a logical debate or discussion that adheres to the established rules and true spirit of debate, such as upholding the burdens of proof and avoiding common logical fallacies like ad hominem attacks, yet are quick to criticize Biden's capabilities. It's disheartening to see some mock his speech impediment, considering the most popular POTUS of all time, FDR, also had a disability. It raises the question of whether they would also encourage their children or grandchildren to ridicule those who use wheelchairs. In the debate, the narrative perpetuated by right-wing media that questions Biden's mental acuity seemed to be confirmed on Thursday, which may have left many undecided voters confused. This faux pas of the Democrats will inadvertently lend credence to other conspiracy theories and misinformation spread by Fox and similar outlets. It may be time for the Democrats to initiate damage control and consider a more viable candidate, someone akin to Gavin Newsom, to restore confidence. If Trump is ever elected leader of the free world again, I suggest that there is a significant chance that his undemocratic, fascist contagion could spread even more globally, with scenarios reminiscent of Hitler's Third Reich not being out of the question.

Old man vs con man! Both candidates are unsuitable to be re-elected. Both parties need to endorse younger experienced democratic candidates.

Yet you have time to respond!

I wonder if CNN will ask Trump 'who won the 2020 election' and then factcheck the response in real time. This question will undoubtably educate most Trump supporters who seem to be unable to even respond to this question let alone elicit an intelligible or intelligent reply.

Right!

So did Trump win the 2020 election?

I suggest that your post is a subliminal admission having nothing left to offer and of yielding to a more intelligent superior opponent who has disproved all of your points. Have a good day!

What happened to your 'right-wing logic and reason(sic)' in your above word salad of illogical fallacies? Here is a logical analysis of your post: Sweeping Generalization Fallacy: The statement assumes all ‘woke liberals’ demand absolute proof against their beliefs. This is a sweeping generalization as beliefs can vary greatly within the same political or ideological group. Straw Man Fallacy: The argument presents a version of ‘woke liberal’ thinking that may not accurately represent the views of many individuals who identify as such, and then criticizes this misrepresentation. Appeal to Authority Fallacy: The statement suggests that because Elon Musk has achieved certain things, all statements about him must be factual. While Musk’s achievements are indeed impressive, it’s important to verify specific claims from reliable sources. False Dilemma Fallacy: The statement implies that one must either accept the ‘woke liberal’ narrative or reject mainstream media outlets like NPR and CNN. In reality, it’s possible to critically engage with multiple sources of information. Ad Hominem Fallacy: The statement attacks the character (‘cognitive bias’) of ‘woke liberals’ instead of addressing the validity of their arguments or beliefs.

Or perhaps it's just a AN requirement of posting on this topic.

Surely ' I digress' should have been before your intro......

Apologies for posting a response beyond your ken. Perhaps the following may explain my post to you. Trump offered to pardon Assange if he denied Russia helped leak Democrats' emails: lawyer | Reuters Other cases to explain ' inference' where Trump meddled in election interference: Trump election interference case paused in Georgia during challenge to prosecutor | Reuters Trump trial: Prosecution say hush money was 'pure election fraud' (bbc.com) Trump’s transparent attempt to play the victim on ‘election interference’ - The Washington Post (archive.md)

I would have thought Trump would have done that as Assange-released Clinton emails seemingly helped him with his 2016 election interference efforts. Possibly Trump was busy pardoning his other fellow criminals.

Just finished Maid (TV Mini Series 2021) - IMDb 8.3/10. Quite enjoyable.

For the 'truth to be told' 'alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source'. Ergo your post is devoid of any 'truth being told' without any of these artifacts.

Are you trying to censor free speech. GOP rhetoric is that only Democrats do that. Seven Democrat dissenters did not sink the bill, that was the GOP majority. Polls do not determine the passing of bills in Congress. This failure of this bill was undemocratically determined by Trump.

Thank you for posting a link that supports my OP. CNN says 'the bill – which was negotiated on a bipartisan basis'. Yet you and the NYP wrongly infer that because of minority Democratic dissent that the rejection was bi-partisan.

The term 'bipartisan' has been misrepresented by the Murdoch misinformation machine. It is evident that the majority of the GOP, presumably following Trump's directive, voted against the bill, which aimed to address the border issue, while the majority of Democrats supported it. This does not constitute a bipartisan effort. The responsibility for the bill's rejection rests squarely with the GOP, which appears to be acting against the interests of the American people. I agree best to put people you disagree with on ignore. Why have an honest discussion with anyone when you are unable to without embarrassing yourself.

'Any fool knows' ......that Biden legitimately won the 2020 election. Even Trump, what about you?

Right!

Is your support of the GOP and/or Trump consistent with your views on 'ethics and moral direction and living guidelines' and 'guidance for todays' youth on moral and ethical development'? Most consider a President should be someone youth aspire to be and as someone who is a model of your views and I suggest Biden is the far lesser of two evils. Or possibly this is just a case of your cognitive dissonance? Trump's Moral Compass

Trump only knows ' the best people'. Along with ex wingman Epstein, and Trump even with a past court case concerning a 13-year-old, the concept of a Pizza Gate seems to have been attributed to the wrong party.

A more comprehensive list for you : Owner of a fraudulent charity foundation and university. A proven rapist with allegations of sexual assault by more than 20 women including his wife and a 13-year-old child. A proven fraudster with fines of 500 million and banned from NY business Impeached twice and a convict felon on 34 criminal counts all for election interference. Arrested arraigned and indicted on other 57 criminal counts which are now pending trial. And as proven to be morally bankrupt also financially bankrupt 6 times How anyone could vote for this individual devoid of any moral compass is beyond the pale.

I am surprised that Fox hasn't added a rider to the poll: The polls are irrelevant to the final outcome of the 2024 election and will of the people. As in 2020 Fox will push all necessary conspiracy theories and misinformation to support Trump and his lies that he won the 2024 election independent of the actual outcome.

As a self-appointed spokesperson for an anti-religion group, an atheist, and someone who believes that religion has caused more problems than it has solved, I view the introduction of Sharia Law as having as much legal right as this proposed legislation.

The last three times I underwent vision tests for a Thai driving license, they included a standard color-blindness test where I had to identify a number within a circle of various colors. Additionally, there was a brake reaction test involving traffic lights and a depth perception test requiring the alignment of two pins on slides. Are these tests still not the same? I need to retake the test soon.