J Town

8 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

 History will show Trump was the most moral.

C'mon - even you can't think that's right.  He has cheated on every one of his wives, he has lied more than any president in history, he has covered up hush money paid to porn stars - the list goes on. Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeze!

1 hour ago, webfact said:

Drainage work is ongoing in Pattaya with officials hoping that this will solve the resort's long standing flooding issues.

I bet if I did a search on that statement, I could go back DECADES and find these very same words.

1 minute ago, Eric Loh said:

<snip> He represent the people; not himself.  

No. He's SUPPOSED to represent the people, but he only cares about himself and his cronies.

4 minutes ago, Boon Mee said:

It's just pathetic to see the numbers of posters who hate Trump to the point they support the Commie Xi. 

Remember who initialized this Wuhan Flu <deleted>, eh? 

 

That's a nonsensical argument, it's not binary.

21 minutes ago, Crazy Alex said:

Actually, it's the DOJ who has opted to abandon the case.

DT ordered his personal attorney (Barr) to drop the charges. Just about every other person involved in the justice system, current and former, had to pick their jaws up off the floor in disbelief when he did. Judge Sullivan, who heard the case in the first place, is putting the brakes on Barr and is bringing in outside experts to look again at this.

25 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

Only 4 words to say for this disgrace. Restart the first term.

If by restart the first term you mean including an election redo then HELL yes. People's eyes are now open to what a blight this president is. Yeah, people who are part of the 36% cult (the ones who ignore facts) certainly will vote for the blight again. But the 43% who did NOT vote in the 2016 election would come out to correct this atrocity.

Civilized countries are giving masks to those who don't have one.

2 hours ago, Nigel Garvie said:

7 hours ago, WalkingOrders said:

Dont drop links man...state in your own words. You can do it!

Actually we are encouraged to provide links to support our arguments, where appropriate, otherwise it just comes over as personal opinion. I'm not suggesting that you can't read, but maybe you are just to lazy, or don't like facts. 

Anyhow I have read quite enough fantastical nonsense from you, and I'll blank you and save myself from having to read any more.

Goodbye.

That's why I just laughed. That poster is not interested in finding the truth, he just likes stirring up the pot.

10 minutes ago, WalkingOrders said:

State what Flynn's lie was. State it in the clearest of terms and I will give you a response.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/05/secrets-flynn-lied-conceal/611377/

"Flynn’s lies mattered because they concealed a deal between Trump and Russia over sanctions."

18 minutes ago, Phoenix Rising said:

OK then. You go on living in your alternate bubble universe and those who're not deluded can keep on living in the real world. There's certainly no point arguing with you because for you Trump can do no wrong and any and all criticism of his blatant abhorrent and criminal behavior is just "fake news!". 

You cannot - I repeat CANNOT - argue using facts with Trump supporters. I read the Mueller report, most of us saw the testimony given by career civil servants who dealt with this very subject, it happened. We are absolutely living in an Orwellian doublespeak existence. I just don't get the cult of personality when there is so much evidence to the contrary.

55 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

This is what the liberals here are attempting to do . . . 

 

Imagine a hypothetical case of murder.  A culprit is caught, tried, a confession is wrought, convicted, and sent to prison.  Years later the true murderer is caught and he confesses.  His DNA confirms his guilt.  What happens to whatever testimony, evidence which was used to convict the innocent man?  It's obvious, ain't it?

 

As the actual truth comes out, first drip by drip but now at seeming avalanche speed, what happens to the old evidence in the Flynn case?  In this hypothetical case the liberals here would still insist that the innocent man was indeed guilty while screaming, "But he confessed."

 

It's a denial of reality.  In this case it's the liberals extreme, biased hatred for Trump and any and all associated with or supportive of Trump.  These people are truly sick.

First - Using the label "liberal" is an automatic setup for "us vs them" rather than discussing an issue to get to the truth.

Second - Using a hypothetical is merely an embellishment of your imagination.

Third - you deny the reality of Flynn's confession. The judge was very clear when accepting his guilty plea that Flynn understood exactly what he was doing.

6 hours ago, webfact said:

The White House is pushing for a payroll tax cut, he added.

This is code for killing Social Security.