Jump to content

Bday Prang

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    5,457
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bday Prang

  1. Was just looking at geenlabs website all very "professional looking" wonder who's the influential guy behind that ? certainly doesn't look like a temporary thing either and that's possibly something to be optimistic about regarding future availability . It will certainly appeal to the more "well-heeled" customer However I hope any future legislation doesn't squeeze out the smaller guy's firstly as I rather prefer the more down to earth experience (and prices) of shopee or getting it off a local guy, met some good friends that way over the years too. And secondly because its not fair if the economic benefits that were touted for all are monopolised for the usual suspects, especially if legislation is used to achieve that aim That would be bad for users too But allowing people to grow 10 plants is also a positive sign and I doubt that will change Also if chintzy shops start popping upon the highstreet it might just help to dispell the "dirty pothead" image that the prohibitionists like to project
  2. hahaaha that absolutely looks like busted teenager forced to attend by his mother...Brilliant Observation
  3. Now there's a thing, years ago when i was younger back in the 70's we always used to pass spliffs round, sometimes it got a bit ridiculous with maybe 5 people and six spliffs going around, then one day it just kind of stopped, don't remember when, but all of a sudden we just smoked our own, and anybody who did pass a spliff round was considered a bit weird. Not a bad thing really as some people had really sloppy mouths and there was nothing worse than a saliva soaked spliff
  4. If it was really a lounge in cheek then maybe I should retract my remarks. But I still think that considering the level of ignorance and what almost boils down to bigotry regarding the matter in question the use of such clichés is not very helpful
  5. You are talking about "spice" , it does not provide the effects that cannabis users desire and would be avoided like the plague so there is no future for that either . "Spice" itself only exists as a direct consequence of prohibition If people were just allowed to grow their own there would be no black market, no "mafia" involvement. no profits to be made, and no need for any regulation. It would in effect be exactly the same as growing your own tomatoes
  6. It would be a waste of time and money adding "normal" cocaine, as cocaine in its standard form cannot be smoked (well you could smoke it theoretically but it wouldn't have much effect) it needs to be crack cocaine and seeing as its not grown in Burma it would be prohibitively expensive. Certain kind's of heroine can be smoked but the effects would not be what users of cannabis are looking for so another waste of time and money That allegation is therefore discredited
  7. You obviously don't smoke it so why are you so eager to know? thinking of reporting somebody?? Or are you considering dealing ?
  8. you can look on shopee but bear in mind the progeny from seeds are not identical, once you have grown one that you like , cuttings are the way forward
  9. For clarification could you please tell us your definition of a "pothead" Presumably, anybody that has ever used cannabis ? Would that include mature responsible users as well as medicinal users? Once we have cleared that up we can then explore the definition of "Pisshead" to see if it includes you. but of course it won't will it. Especially in a couple of weeks time when you will be forbidden by law to purchase your drug of choice for a day or two!! How ironic hope you have stocked up
  10. Probably also got something to do with the medical profession and how people use it as well. A bit like Covid for example, If there is more testing there is more covid and vice versa. Likewise with heart disease , and when you take into account that most people here could not afford the expensive treatments / medicines there is not much incentive for the drug companies and hospitals to get involved. Whereas in the USA and Europe ........
  11. Possibly the only thing it should be tested for is insecticide, but then again even the food doesn't get tested for that very much
  12. I don't think its that straightforward. Firstly I think the only way of actually testing the % of a specific sample would probably require the use of a mass spectrometer an expensive piece of kit beyond the reach of most people. Any such testing would need to be done in a lab. Secondly it would only give the results specifically for the actual sample tested, I would imagine this could vary significantly depending on exactly which part of the plant was sampled, Its not like testing a sample from a bottle of scotch, where the alcohol is effectively in solution and therefore would be indicative of the rest of the bottle. Thirdly the % of THC within the plant varies depending on several factors, Its stage of maturity , how well it was looked after and the general growing conditions all play a part. Fourthly the make up of Cannabis is a complex science there are many other compounds present which no doubt all contribute to the lovely effects of ingestion, Its not just about the THC so I wouldn't give too much importance to quoted THC percentages, most of which are probably made up by the growers / sellers (and soon to arrive advertising agencies). At the end of the day another major factor in how it affects one , is the mood one is in when one smokes, I'm sure you know what I mean
  13. "wow far out man" Are you actually serious ? For once in my life words actually fail me I am literally speechless.!!
  14. As usual the prohibitionists can't help themselves I have still not heard what your description of a "decent" tourist comprises of. Please enlighten us Presumably it is people just like you ?
  15. Link doesn't seem to work, probably didn't go down too well with prikpot !
  16. Of course it doesn't always have cannabis in it, don't be ridiculous , you shouldn't take any notice of any the inflammatory rubbish that gets posted on here by the anti-cannabis brigade. How could anybody seriously post something as stupid as that? and surely you're not gullible that you believe it. If as you suspect, the food was stored overnight, and reserved the next day, there would be endless stories of mass food poisoning outbreaks. That is not really the case is it ? Just to elaborate on something I mentioned in a previous post the worst case I have ever experienced personally was when me and the Mrs ate a crab curry from a rather expensive restaurant in Phuket, not really my style but she wanted to see how the other half lived. I think it cost over 3000 bt and that was about 20 years ago. We were both as sick as dogs for 4 days. sometimes even vomiting simultaneously into the toilet! The other end of the digestive system wasn't much better but at least we managed to stagger those evacuations, She is convinced to this day that it was prepared, possibly in error, for a customer earlier in the day ,and when they didn't want it, it was kept on the off chance that somebody would order it later., which I think is quite possible., but also very unlikely to happen with a street vendor, don't you think? There have been a few programmes on Tv recently, exposing some of the filthy conditions in so called "quality restaurants" I think Gordon Ramsey made a complete series about it so be careful what you base your assumptions on I'm not saying that all street food is perfect and with out fault, and I understand it may not be to your taste, (too spicy maybe? But do dismiss it all as dirty is somewhat unfair to both the sellers and the consumers Thais can be very fussy about food in their own way, and places that don't meet their expectations don't last long, so if one follows them one won't go far wrong as far as street food is concerned, or any food for that matter. The places to avoid as far as I'm concerned ,are the restaurants catering mainly to tourists were they are not too concerned about repeat customers due to the normally large turnover, wouldn't you agree?
  17. I did not say you were wrong, but you uttered a sweeping generalisation, which I disagreed with. Of course you are perfectly entitled to eat what ever and where ever you choose. As is anybody else But you chose to basically insult anybody who choses to eat in places that you personally don't like. Did you not think were inviting at least some criticism with a statement like that ?
×
×
  • Create New...