Jump to content

Khaeng Mak

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    612
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Khaeng Mak

  1. 2 minutes ago, Wake Up said:

    Human Rights - wow has to be a troll.

     

    Whenever I feel bad I read Thai Visa because some funny guys exist like NCC1701A (LMAO funny man).????????????????

     

    Some real miserable sickos that post hate, misery, arrogance, doom, racism, superiority and the chicken little dramas because Thais have a different culture that the western world you left  ????

     

    Also some guys like Udonjoe and BritTim and Jack Thompson and others provide valuable advice. ????

     

    My only hope is that the new requirements get some of you moaners to move on and when you do please spread your misery in your new country’s forum.  Please leave the happy Thailand expats alone. ????

     

    For the married guys that claim they have to leave then switch to the marriage extension as nothing has changed with that extension.  So stop saying Thailand wants expats to leave their wives and kids in the rice fields.  That is ridiculous. ????

     

    Did you do a course on how to use emojis? Or are you self taught?

    • Like 1
  2. On 2/5/2019 at 8:47 AM, thaiguzzi said:

    Tells me everything about you, that you've only just watched a film made in 1953, and that was banned in the UK until the late 60's.

    Commenting in the motorcycle sub forum.

    With nothing but snarky one liners.

    Yes, even 30 years ago it was a corny movie.

    In 1953 it was shock & horror.

    And it scared the mainstream. The squares.

    It is indeed a cult movie.

    It is based on a true event in Hollister, California in 1947.

    I doubt you've heard of that either.

    Cut a long story short, Hollister (and the AMA's reply) was basically the start of the back patch & 1%er scene.

     

    That is why this movie was so important.

    As for Brando (who was huge at the time), uttering that immortal line "whatya got?" after being asked the question "hey Johnny, whatya rebelling against?".

    Classic. Just classic.

     

     

    Just because something was a fad, does not mean that is important or significant.

     

    Fidgets were huge last year.

     

    And, if this movie marks the start of bike gangs and their colors, the end point of that development is the blanket banning of these groups in many countries, Australia is one relevant example, to help fight against the proliferation of meth amphetamine.

     

    Have you ever lived in America?

     

    Oh. And for what it is worth, I have had bikes my whole life and organised a number of events to raise money for pediatric hospital wards. The last one I put together raised $147,000 for much need new equipment.

     

     

     

    • Confused 1
  3. 9 minutes ago, LivinLOS said:

    Reading between the lines.. 3 million baht O-X retirement visa.. Thailand elite systems.. I would tend to agree that is the signalling. 

     

    As ever with Thailand they will gradually introduce things, like a frog in hot water, death by a 1000 cuts style.. That way they can control the pressure applied as they see fit, depending n how they do economically. During that time many will remain in denial, many will yell the 'go home if you dont like it' when the element they introduce doesnt apply to them (kind of ironic how the tables have reversed lately from the young guys losing repeat entry and easy tourist visas.. Old stable retirees telling them 'thailand owes you nothing, theres not a class for you' from thier high horse.. and now ??).. 

     

    The only constant since my arrival in 2001 is that none of it has gotten easier.. 

     

     

    Yep. Remember a few years bacl when they were cracking down on the ED visa. Those on retirement extensions were riding high in the saddle then.  Now it's their turn to have their lives torn apart.

    • Sad 2
  4. 43 minutes ago, Moonlover said:

    If the 'grandfathering' also applies to married applicants it might be even less than 400K. You need to look up the criteria for marriage extensions and see whether it applies.

     

    I'm quite sure he's not 'done for' as our prophet of doom said above.

     

     

    I'll be back to say I told you so when the compulsory insurance hammers falls later this year.

     

    Long stay expats here are currently under siege.

     

    If you want to live in denial "up to you".

    • Sad 2
    • Thanks 2
  5. 1 hour ago, sleepy99 said:

    Besides, on paper, he would fully qualify to extend based on 200K in the bank because of being here on retirement prior to 1998.

     

    From a pragmatic point of view, how would he prove that?

     

    His older passports would be gone for sure one would imagine?

     

    And immigration cannot even keep records on a retiree for more than 12 months. I have to submit reams of the exactly the same documents year after year.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  6. 6 hours ago, Jingthing said:

    Just keeping it real.

    Many people already here are invested in Thailand either with assets, relationships, or both. So it's very hard for many of them to leave and disastrous if they're deported on short notice.

    Others should be warned away before they make similar mistakes.

    This is way beyond the writing on the wall category. It's happening. 

    Long stay expats here are currently under siege. Unfortunately, the mass of them do not yet realize it.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
  7. 21 minutes ago, OJAS said:

    Not at Rayong Immigration (our office), thank goodness. See report below from an acquaintance who obtained his latest retirement extension there yesterday on the basis of 800k in the bank:-

     

    "I asked about the latest Police Order, which is perfectly clear as to what is required re maintaining 800k for 5 months of the year and 400k for the other 7 months, but says nothing about the verification process. Are we going to have to start producing our bank books/ statements every 90 days? The answer - as far as Rayong Immigration is concerned - is no. As long as when you next apply (after the first application under this Order) you can produce a record of the required balances for the previous year you're in the clear. This is what I hoped they'd say, and eminently sensible."

     

    And what if you are in breach.  That is the million dollar question.  Do they just not renew your new application next year. And when can you apply? Or are you banished onto a tourist visa or whatever other solution you can scrounge up. Or do you have to deposit 800K and wait another 2 months to season it

     

    Or if you failed to keep your balance over 400K all year are you declared on overstay, as would be the case if you were on a non-B extension and got fired, or a marriage extension and got divorced?

     

    And if the breach (just one satang by the way would be all it that it takes), and it occurred more than 6 months prior to your date of application can you be jailed for overstay, deported and banned from Thailand for 5 years.

  8. 5 hours ago, Jingthing said:

    Good question.

     

    The new rules about 800K bank account applications apply to all.

     

    The new rules about required monthly import are only about income based applications for people that can't get embassy letters.

     

    Combo method for people that can't get embassy letters is not mentioned at all in orders or memos, so those expecting to do that need to be warned that based on what we know now, there is an excellent chance of rejection. 

     

    How people are supposed to make plans in this kind of unclear chaotic environment is beyond me. 

    They only plan they want you to make is a plan of departure.

×
×
  • Create New...