
Dan O
Advanced Member-
Posts
4,171 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by Dan O
-
Some people are just caustic and don't have good people skills to communicate because the feel their opinion is the only correct one
-
Its not income taxable in Thailand if you dont work for a Thai company and are paid in Thailand or if working online outside the country and paid outside the country and you dont bring income into the country in the same year its earned. Short answer
-
It shouldn't be a problem. If you bring the income into Thailand in the same year you earn it you could be subject to taxes. Im not sure how anyone would know what money was earned and brought into the country vs money earned in a prior year. There can always be some exception.
-
Restaurant owner confronts negative reviewer at their home
Dan O replied to snoop1130's topic in Thailand News
Leaving a "bad" if its warranted or reflects accuracy isn't being a "keyboard warrior". Seems the writter was slightly biased on they story by this comment. -
Retirement visa without the 800,000 baht
Dan O replied to Bernard LP's topic in Thai Visas, Residency, and Work Permits
Rubbish -
Retirement visa without the 800,000 baht
Dan O replied to Bernard LP's topic in Thai Visas, Residency, and Work Permits
Your talking nonsense. Its illegal. Saying "it legitmate" is bs. Trying to play word semantics. -
Retirement visa without the 800,000 baht
Dan O replied to Bernard LP's topic in Thai Visas, Residency, and Work Permits
No its not legal. There are legitimate agencies that take all the proper paperwork and proof of the 800000 baht in the bank and process it for you. Im pretty sure doing an extension thru an agent where they fake your money is technically illegal although not enforced. Big difference. Pay your money and take your chances in the current climate at Imm. -
I agree a 27 year marriage shouldnt just be chucked into the garbage for a one time lack of judgement. Taking 800000 baht is a bit more than a one time lack of judgement. I am pretty sure a person would know what they have done and how serious it is as that amount of money isn't like buying an extra dress or some small purchase especially if the excuse was "I had to bail out a restaurant". I am not sure how I would deal with it but we would have a come to Jesus moment while we got to the real truth, which If I couldn't get the whole truth with proof of what was really done then I would be considering ending it as there is no more trust without honestly.
-
Is Sin Sod (Dowry) due when gay Thai/Brit couple partner in UK?
Dan O replied to PeeJayEm's topic in Gay People in Thailand
Do you understand the purpose of SinSod and why the tradition began and why it was paid? -
I think Bob has an opening now since he got rid of that girl in Ko Chang.
-
In the past , culturally grandparents take care of grandchildren more often than not across all of Thailand. It has starting to change in the recent past but that cultural thinking is still there. Historically it goes for grandparents and parents in most of rural Thailand which is the bulk of the country. They take care of the children and when they get old the children pay it back by taking care of them in return as they age. Throw that on top of the pile of respect your parents and family, don't bring shame on the family, maintain face so there isn't village and family gossip, etc. For the OP, I had this conversation with a couple of friends a few years back when they were faced with the money request and similar comment that op has related. What my friends decided to do each time someone asked for money or commented on buying a house they simply said yes I want to build a house for MY family but I have loaned all my money to help family members ( don't name names) and haven't gotten it back yet to do that. They went on to say we even thought about borrowing money from family but decided not to ask as we know that it may case problems so decided not to ask and work to support OURSELVES and not be a burden. That stopped almost all close family comments and request for them. Not sure it will work in all situations but I thought it was a clever back door way of putting them on notice.
-
You are very arrogant so your going on ignore.
-
I do have it right. Im not trying to "win" like you, just providing info. You can move on if you don't like my answer. Also you don't need to be so full of yourself and arrogant. Its not a good look and no one cares. This is an open forum for everyone.
-
Lets be a little clearer for you. Staying in Thailand for 180 days or more for the tax purposes you posted only applies if you have income deemed applicable while living in Thailand. If you dont have income in this category and stay in Thailand 180 days you are not taxed or a "taxable resident" just due to the fact that you live in the country. Slight difference there.
-
The 180 day tax issue now doesnt really exist its just an ongoing statement thats taken on a life of its own and that isnt really true.
-
That works like that as the various visa's and exempt entry have a specific amount of time assigned to them. METV grant you they time and quantity of entries as part of that visa.
-
Well believe what you want, I really don't care. They used to have a disclaimer on the US embassy site that receipt of a visa is not a guarantee of entry and the imm o's have the final say. It was removed when they went to the evisa system. It may have been on all the embassy sites. I've been coming to Thailand since 1984 and never had a problem and never been bounced for overuse of tourist and exempt entries or even questioned. Given the problems raised due to the Chinese grey market and visa issues don't be surprised if you dont see it more. I think its interesting as the talking heads that claim I'm wrong have themselves repeated told people on here with heavy entry history to spend time out between visits if they are concerned and even direct people to "friendly" check points. A little hypocritical on their part but it comes with posting on open forums.
-
The embassies are not part of immigration. They have disclaimers on their site indicating they can refuse a visa without explanation. The imm o's have the same discretion. They allowed to use their discretion and make judgment calls if they think people are abusing the system. They have specific reasons they can deny entry and they also have the ability to use their discretion if they see fit. I don't agree with it but uts not being abused or you would be hearing about it. Inevitably a few get caught out and denied out of the millions of travelers or it would be front page news, which its not. when you do hear their history is obvious they have a history of long stay on tourist visas and visa exempt. They always whine and claim they same, Im allowed cause its not against the law. Well its not written anywhere that you can do that even if they have allowed it in the past. Given the heighten issues with bogus visa and banking issues surrounding the Chinese grey business they crackdown is inevitable.
-
Read the regs and they clearly say io can use discretion based on what they see. They were right that you are trying to stay long term in thailand using exempt entries and tourist visa and you got caught. Get a proper visa for staying long term and avoid what the io's discretion on your "visits" based on the manner you were using
-
Tim you and I have discussed this before and disagree about how you read the regs. The imm officials have the ability to use discretion and it is in the regs. You interpret them different and always claim the officers have to use one of the reasons for denial listed but ignore the fact it says clearly the officers can use their discretion. Believe what you want but its clearly listed
-
Immigration has the discretion to refuse entry to anyone deemed inappropriate with or without a visa. Its written in the regs even though some believe they have to show a "valid" reason. Im not saying I agree with that position. There's usually more to most of these stories than are told by the posters. Im sure there is in this case also.
-
I never said or implied banks are not business. For a bank to add on an arbitrary service and imply you have to pay for this service in order to open an acct may be their "requirement" but its not set as part of their regulatory requirements or even bank policy (you won't see on the list as a requirements) and is extreme predatory and less than honest. Its a money making opportunity thats forced on you purely for their own benefit and has absolutely nothing to do with a bank account. If you choose to pay that fee thats up to you.
-
It is if Bob's in the bar, err I mean house
-
I can just relate my own experience even if one know- it- all claims on the forum didn't happen. In Nov 2022 I opened a bank account while on a visa exempt at Krungsri and without a Cert of Residency. They showed me a sheet that had insurance availble but never asked me to buy it, just if I "ever needed". I live in Nakhon Si Thammarat . I also know several others that did the same last year in a variety of provinces around Thailand. Most banks now wont open an acct while on a tourist visa and without a C of R due to the Chinese fiasco with grey businesses and mule bank accounts. The insurance is just a scheme that was invented by the banks as a way to generate revenue from commissions and isnt a real requirement legally. They only way to find out is to shop around and the chances are higher outside BKK.