Jump to content

Dan O

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    4,793
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dan O

  1. Im well aware of what he said or when, the question was for you. None of that erases or excuses the actions for months leading up to the rally nor any of his speech inciting the crowd to physically go to the capital during the rally or his ignoring the actions during the rioting and storming of the capital. He was well aware from his advisors the temperature of the crowd and there actions when they arrived at the capital.. Nor does it excuse his ignoring pleas from both parties physically trapped in the capitol or his advisors in the Whitehouse, including his daughter. If you think this one sentence does excuse all his other words and lack of action you may want to check your moral compass.
  2. yeah his 1 sentence was lost due to his hour long urging and incitement to go to the capital and fight the election results and take back the country. And exactly when during the speech or during the day did he make his "peaceful" plea???????
  3. Last time I check its an option available to every state, it's called the 14th amendment of the Constitution and was written specifically to guide the country. Enforcing the constitution isnt considered judicial interference. 4 of the 6 people that introduced this for review and judgement were republicans which counters your earlier claims it's liberal, or snowflakes or democrats. The shear poll number of republicans that favor the ruling should be an easily viewable signal its not a one sided political tactic. But then trumpettes and the media wouldnt have a story to tell if its not presented as a violation thats political in nature if trump broke the law then he broke the law and being held accountable is exactly what should happen. if it would happen to you or me and we broke the law then we would be held accountable regardless of political party. As it stands he is disqualified in Colorado but only him not the whole republican party so not sure where your comment on 1 whole party being removed is coming from. If it were a democrat or liberal or tea party candiate it would only affect that person that broke the law not the whole party. Do a bit more research.
  4. your correct you have nothing of substance to offer so You started claiming it's a "liberal" issue or it's "snowflakes" that have " virtue signaling" as a way to try to deflect just like you are now. You cant offer a lucid response so you try to deflect.
  5. Your post makes no sense nor is it in any way accurate. You cant even explain your thinking in sentences that make any sense. What "new" law are you referring to? What part of the system has been "rigged". Your just another trumpette by the sounds of your comments. What virtue signal (wtf does that even mean) are you referring to, following the constitution? You dont even know who is running yet. This lawsuit was presented by 6 people, 4 were Republicans looking for truth and honesty in politics and polls show even a high % of republicans are in favor of the current ruling.
  6. And the unspoken fact that of the 6 people that brought theoriginal lawsuit 4 were Republicans looking to "bring honesty back to politics".
  7. Has nothing to do with liberals to remove an opponent, classic non defensive statement when you have nothing else to defend a POS.
  8. This has nothing to do with liberals and only about an a$$wipe that thinks he's above everyone. More cases are pending in other states about this issue and there's now some precedent being set. People still using the label snowflake are equal pathetic in their defense of this narcissistic POS and don't have any legitimate defense so you resort to those labels to deflect that.
  9. Never said hate your guts. Just call out your bs posts that's all. Your not required to read my replies. But you post in a public forum then you get replies. Don't post if you don't like what people reply
  10. Oh well in that case its suppose to be ok? Not hardly
  11. flying with the Wright Bros doesn't count as there were no license' back then
  12. or intentional stupidity
  13. Unfortunately it didn't affect everyone in the same manner as you. Covid vaccines were not meant to prevent catching covid, it was to lessen the affects and impact
  14. I understood your comment. I was pointing out it wouldnt work as most thais don't use any gutter system. The are available easily, thais just don't see the need for them so it would be a dead end unfortuneately
  15. You're far to old for that despite your fanciful posts you spin Bob. The number of foreigners that live here are not in great enough numbers to colonize the country and I doubt most couple that have kids have those numbers. With all your wealth you sure seem to be spending a lot of time in tge tourist ghettos lately. What happened tovakway hanging out at the beach or your poolside?
  16. You would think that but most houses don't have gutters. Go figure
  17. That's common here to have land values unrealistically high in general. I think its partially because its the only real asset most thais, especially rural farmers have. I think they see it as their retirement fund sort of. Land sits on the market here a long time unless there's really some real desirable aspect to its location currently or coming in the near future. Thais also don't mind having tiny lots if the build their own homes with minimum distance between houses if its in or near a village setting. It gets crazy how their minds work some times. Same with new developments being built often have house so close that the rain run off from the roof falls into the neighbors yard
  18. Most thais appreciate a foreigner speaking thai and making the attempt. There are a number of dialects in Thai so that ways can cause some confusion on what you say. If you speak to them in with the manner and attitude you talk about them on here in your posts I can understand their view of you being poor
  19. Well when some people think they know everything that happens in an area they don't live in and refuse to hear the facts from someone that does, they lose relevance, and that would be you in this case. Have a great day
  20. Yes I done talking to you because you are not relevant
  21. I've been here since 1984. You don't know what province I live in and seem to think whatever happens in your small sector of the country its handled the same in all provinces, which its not. All payouts have not come from the same sources of govt either or distributed in the same manner or by tge same agencies. But you would already know that since you've been here so long. Move along cos this discussion is done
  22. There have been several payouts over the last few years which is what I was referencing about past payouts. They did not come from 1 source locally depending on what the payout was intended for. I know what's happened to my family and that's what I've relayed. If you don't agree i don't care, you can move along as you were not here to see it happen so don't act like you know. Have a great day
  23. yes you've shown us in your posts that in your imagination you can do everything, be everyone you can think up.
  24. It may have for your family but it ha not here in this province. So its exactly like I posted as well. You do understand what goes on in different areas are not the same everywhere dont you?
  25. now your always on the beach. short memory Bob of, where you are, what you own, who your with.
×
×
  • Create New...