Captain Monday

I don't listen to the "west". I have my own worldview. Of course all governments "lie" Now other than shooting down a civilian airliner, poisoning/jailing critics, a sight of Kossacks beating punk rock girrlz in the street with stock-whips and illegal invasions.... Please tell us one good thing Putin has accomplished for the Russian people? 80 million plus Americans have been completely co-opted by Kremlin propaganda and will be voting for Putin's stooge, Donald J Trump in November, without Russia firing a shot against the US. That I admit, is really quite an accomplishment.

That is called "resting angry face" He will be smiling on election night.

Bots? I don't think so here. More the useful dupes who may not even know they trade in foreign propaganda. Somehow we got to a place over the last 8-10 years in US where the average right winger driving a tractor in Montana holds forth a nearly entire worldview that is completely consistent word-for-word Kremlin propaganda. This phenomena did not occur as natural political evolution. "The Russian "Firehose of Falsehood" Propaganda Model Why It Might Work and Options to Counter It" https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE198.html

Maybe I'm not linking to it right but he laughed out loud once on The View 18 years ago in a vid with no sound? He really just smiles and gloats, at his own lame jokes, always punching down As well as being the most successful golfer in Presidential history Trump must think he is the world's best comedian too Remember when Trump mocked a reporter with a congenital condition? That was really funny A tragic figure incapable of real joy Likely the result of serious undiagnosed childhood trauma masked by years of privilege Doubt he even loves his own children I just wish he would admit his issues and get help.

Reminds me of the time a conservative Republican at a friends dinner party was raving how great Singapore is. These people smoke so much of their own dope, the contradictions go right over their heads.

Sexual dimorphism is a subject of biology but there is really nothing such as a man or a woman in the Humanist context Perhaps 🤔 a gender studies course at your local University extension could help you with your misunderstandings?

Why would an alien migrant want to vote? To get a sticker?

That disgusting monstrosity should be dynamited then returned to a more natural appearance if at all possible

"Muslim Defence League" Where have I heard that before?

There are no Thai right-wingers Thailand has conservatives in context of constitutional Monarchy A rational political ideology one can argue the merits of even if you don't agree with it right-wingers believe in tropes Example in Thailand some people keep guns at home, for protection, hunting, etc., but nobody believes the gun makes them "free"or that every unqualified dope should be able to keep war weapons as a right Nor do they believe tax cuts for billionaires create jobs or not having health insurance is a good thing It is really just a facade of lies to get the working class to vote against its own interests Seem to be plenty on AN. Maybe it is Chiang Mai but I have not ran into many right wingers.

I can see that. But by that logic a transperson who presents as a "man" could require a safe space from predatory males in mens rooms I just think we should work to eliminate the sexualization of nudity and excretory functions. Where do you think Wiley, who is a man who gave birth to a baby should go to pee ?

Why not? Is this the "danger of rape argument"? I have been in mens rooms all my life never been assaulted by a gay man and in Thailand only felt up by one of those irritating massage guys by the urinals

Might look for a country to accept Americans for Political asylum after November.

I had a bottle ripped out of my hand suddenly and very aggressively so a thuggish bouncer could check for a paint spot on the bottom. Backpackers bringing in drinks had been assaulted before. I had done nothing wrong, another very nice man had just served me and brought me change

Now I wish I viewed it. I only saw this glimpse above the bar while I was eating my impossible burger with fried cheese curds. Is she half French and Japanese ?

And if that happens the American person is held responsible under law. long jail, even execution in some countries. If an American Bully does same the dog might get put down, when it is just being itself by following it’s instinct or training and the human owner suffers no consequences other than maybe paying money. That makes sense to you?

Great. I gave up arguing with dangerous breed apologists. The owners knew the risk. Only they could have prevented their dangerous livestock getting out of their property. In my opinion the mans death was their choice as clearly as if they picked up a machete and did I themselves, but they are definitely responsible. Certainly no fault of the dogs. (Example 1: ‘GBH murder’ Under English criminal law, a person can be convicted of murder when she: (i) caused the death of another person and (ii) intended to cause that person really serious bodily harm – also known as grievous bodily harm, or GBH. Murder is a common law crime, meaning it is defined by the courts, and not found in a statute passed by Parliament. The above definition of murder was confirmed in a case called Cunningham in 1981. The decision in Cunningham about what the law of murder is raises important questions about what the law of murder should be. Should people be held liable for murder only where they intended (or at least foresaw) that they might cause the death of another person? Or should some unintended and unforeseen killings be included within the definition of murder? On the one hand, it can be argued that people should only be blamed for things they have chosen to bring about, or at least chosen to risk bringing about. This conception of blame relies on an argument about individual autonomy and control: if a choice is made, control is exercised, and individual autonomy is on display. Without choice, there is no such control and individual autonomy is not displayed. This choice-based account might limit murder to cases where the defendant intended to bring about death, or at least foresaw the risk of killing another person. This is because it cannot be said that there is a choice to bring about death, or risk causing death, where there is ignorance of the possibility that someone might die. In cases where the defendant intended only to cause GBH, and did not intend to kill, or foresee the risk of causing death, liability for a lesser crime than murder (for instance, manslaughter) might more accurately reflect the defendant’s responsibility and culpability, whilst respecting the defendant’s choices and individual autonomy. On the other hand, it can be argued that it is not simply ‘bad luck’ when the victim of an attack intended to cause GBH dies. Rather, it is a foreseeable result of such serious attacks (and part of the reason why such attacks are criminalised and punished severely, even where death does not result). As such, the defendant made her own (bad) luck in choosing (autonomously) to intentionally cause the victim GBH, and should be liable for murder where death results, even if she claims credibly that there was no intention to kill, or even foresight of the risk of death. Which argument do you find more compelling, and why? Are there any other arguments for or against ‘GBH murder’?)

If people insist on keeping their wonderful loving pitties and apparently nothing can be done to stop it these owners of canine time bombs should be held responsible under law as if they committed the crime themselves

No I wont. Of course it was an asassination attempt Another incident with a with a weapon no private citizen in a rational country should be allowed to posses. And terrible security failure. The SS director resigned on bipartisan demands.

Christians? In the US they are really being persecuted and disadvantaged. There are none on the Supreme Court. The Congress is full of Muslims and Buddhists. You can’t say Merry Christmas or celebrate Easter anymore. Looks at the CEO’s and corporate boards of Fortune 500 companies. All atheistic women, Jews, Hindus and Zoroastrians. Really open season on so-called Christians. Trump just wants to make America great again.

It's called ballistics. Sources tell me a graze by a supersonic 5.56 NATO or .223 round missing head by less than an inch ear would be gone and maybe part of skull. Where is the ballistics report? Where is the medical report? Where is the pathology report? All you have is Trumps lies and another "beautiful letter" from the discredited former White House quack Dr Ronny Johnson. Remember Trump could not hardly remember his name is Jackson due the marked mental decline he displays daily. Or perhaps the FBI director has access to some better information? https://www.ktsm.com/news/national-news/fbi-director-stirs-controversy-with-trump-bullet-skepticism/

youTuber interviews Deputy Director Deneral for consular affairs Khun Naruchai Ninnad of Ministry of Foreign Affairs Interview begins around 03:00 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xfy6zvvekkE The TRUTH About Thailand's New DTV Visa

Dr. Angela Davis

his skin a pallette of cultural appropriation

Trump’s ear was not pierced by a “bullet”.