habuspasha
-
Posts
351 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by habuspasha
-
-
8 hours ago, Stocky said:
How old is she?
Maybe she doesn't want to lose her dentures.
30 something with her own perfect teeth and no bad breath or periodontal disease. Why is culture so difficult to accept?
- 1
-
19 hours ago, Pravda said:
There is no Thai or Asian culture regarding this.... That's BS.
Just let people be. Some like kissing some don't.
I do Japanese porn kissing, but can't drink water from the same bottle with a woman. Go figure
Let me get this right: there is no Thai or Asian culture; just Japanese.
-
2 hours ago, BritManToo said:
Thai people are trained from birth not to be different.
But every foreign guy seems to think he's found one that is different.
Everyone is different in some ways and similar in some ways. This thread has clearly established a particularly Thai kind of kissing (sniffing) and a possible Thai aversion to Western kissing. That doesn't mean all Thais, but a cultural tradition that affects Thais more than say Europeans. When my GF says she just doesn't like it, I would be stupid to overlook this cultural difference. I would also lose an opportunity to know her better if I just rejected her because she wants something else. Because I think most people are similar in wanting personal contact, intimacy, affection, even love--the reality, not just the play-acting (though that can be satisfying too). The point is to find out how to get there.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, katana said:
Traditionally Thais tend to HAWM or do the sniff kiss where they touch your cheek with their lips and give a little sniff rather than the Western kiss with tongues.
Although there are some that are open to the Western kiss - there are no hard and fast rules.
Thank you, Katana. I didn't know this. It is the kind of information I was looking for. Not only because it makes me feel more secure, but because it is what she seems to want. I would also like a more culturally sensitive understanding of foreplay, cuddling, hugging, and other sorts of physical intimacy short of sex. Sex is not the problem. It is straight forward: actually too straight forward by Western romantic-love standards. And I would expect BGs to be well versed in romance imitation, but I want more from the GF who really cares for me. Not enough to look elsewhere, as some of you advised, and I would marry her if I could. I am trying to better understand her expectations of love more deeply than she can tell me in order to contextualize my own and lessen the difference between us.
- 1
-
15 minutes ago, Lacessit said:
IMO the majority of Thai women I was with, up to and including my GF, enjoyed foreplay and cuddling. It's only the frigid ones that don't, which should be an indication.
I'd dispute there is a cultural difference. While my GF was very shy initially, once she had her first climax she could not get enough of the full platter. Some of the Thai women I've been with previously screwed like rabbits.
Does your GF have orgasms, or is she faking? Sorry, your relationship does not sound normal to me, and the fact you are questioning it is another red flag.
After "When Harry Met Sally," who can say? She says she does, and thanks me. Said she didn't before. But can wait another day or two.
-
Regarding trolling, I assume that means baiting members to say something they might not normally say? Why would I do that? I don’t know anyone here, and I’m only interested in finding out how unique my experience is. Regarding sex, I’m satisfied. It’s the extras I desire more of. And I have no reason to believe that her fervor is waning or that she is only in it for the money. I think this is specifically about kissing, foreplay and cuddling. And I think it's a cultural difference. Some of you seem to agree, no?
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
She won’t kiss me. Not just in public, but even when we’re alone. She says she doesn’t like it. So I can’t kiss her either. Except on the cheek or the top of her head as she leans in to me. But not on the lips. That is, not on the lips of her mouth: So it’s not a fear of contagion. I understand why bar girls and sex workers won’t kiss. But we have been exclusive for over five years now. I guess it’s more a Thai thing: no public display of affection; not even expressive private display of feelings. So there’s also no foreplay, no cuddling. Have others experienced anything like this? If so, did things change? How? Or do you just accept it?
- 1
- 9
-
"Been living on the East Coast in the UK for the last 40 years, just looked out of the window, No its not risen yet."
What a relief to get this post. We should tell all the scientists right away. I also looked out the window and saw that the sun was actually moving around the earth, not the other way around. -
Thank you all for your suggestions, comments, wishes, and songs. I think I will look for property down the royal coast, not in the mountains but at some compromise between elevation and proximity to the Gulf. And I should probably rent. At least until I am sufficiently inured.
I have to say that I was struck by the strength and certainty of the climate deniers in the group. Some denials rest on a confusion of scale. The earth has been cooling for the last 5 billion years. We have been in a period of global warming since the end of the last ice age 15,000 years ago. This may precede a future ice age in the next 10,000 years. But despite these cycles, or inside this one, we are frying the planet by ourselves. There is no question about the impact of carbon buildup since the industrial revolution. The scientific consensus is virtually unanimous. It’s striking how deniers can question the motivation of scientists at non-profits and universities, but not those who are far better compensated by the fossil fuel industry. I have already commented on the uncanny precision in the prophecies of such non-human caused futures as “solar cycles,“ which bristolboy nicely showed to be a restatement of the Judeo-Christian apocalypse. I am concerned with how smoothly some posts passed from denial to acceptance to quietism. Even some of the presumed experts like Bjorn Lomborg seem to say that the extreme scenarios are so frightening they couldn’t possibly happen; we can ignore them because there is nothing we could do about it. This echos the more understandable attitude of members who say “I‘m alright Jack because I’m five meters up.” The beach will come only so far.
Decades ago, a psychologist coined the term “cognitive dissonance,” interestingly enough to describe the mental confusion that resulted from the failure of an expected future to arrive. I feel it about the reverse. Everything I read, understand, and know tells me that the oceans are rising, likely far beyond our expectations. But I experience cognitive dissonance when I see rising coastal real estate prices or falling mortgage rates. More to the point, I can’t shake my own confusion because I have always lived near an ocean and want to continue to do so. It’s not head vs. heart, though. It’s cognitive dissonance because I can’t believe things are really going to be as bad as I believe they will become.
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I addressed my post to those who took the science of global warming seriously and was pleased to hear from both of you. I intended to ignore the rest, but at the risk of signaling assent by my silence I feel bound to respond.
First, I am well aware that Bangkok is sinking. Its subsidence is due to heavy building on delta silt. Along with the rising seas it puts Bangkok in a particularly unenviable spot. A glance at the Climate Central map (https://coastal.climatecentral.org/map/8/100.9559/13.0917/?theme=sea_level_rise&map_type=coastal_dem_comparison&elevation_model=coastal_dem&forecast_year=2050&pathway=rcp45&percentile=p50&return_level=return_level_1&slr_model=kopp_2014 shows far deeper penetration of sea water up the Chao Phraya almost up to Ayutthaya than, say, the Pranburi River or any other areas along coastal Thailand. (I heard today of salt in Bangkok tap water.) In comparison, the CC map projects flooding in Hua Hin to stop well east of Phet Kassem Road (Route 4). The question for the rest of Thailand (and, yes, the rest of the world) is where the beach is going to be 10, 30, 50, 100 years from now.
One member points to New Zealand, saying the ocean is rising less than 3 mm a year in the last century. (It’s actually 1.7 mm.) However, this measure fails to factor in the gradually increasing rate, time lag from ocean warming to rising, and effects of further glacial melting, especially tipping points. For an answer to the question “If sea-level rise is only 2–3 millimetres per year, then why worry?” see https://niwa.co.nz/natural-hazards/hazards/sea-levels-and-sea-level-rise.
Another member calls our attention to a theory about solar cycles, employing a measuring tool finely calibrated to the nearest 12,068 years. It projects the global ecopalypse for 2046 much more confidently than the legions of scientists who are measuring daily tides, temperatures, ice cores, and melting rates. Evidence is offered in “The nova cycle that took out the Egyptians, the Sumerians, and the Mayans and other established historical civilizations,” despite the fact that Sumerian civilization ended about 3,000 years before the Egyptian which ended about 1,000 years before the Mayan--not exactly simultaneous.
Finally, two other members ask us to reject the scientific consensus in favor of the astute buying prescience of wealthy Chinese tourists and a former American president who has an extra 11 million dollars to spend on a second home.
- 4
- 3
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
It's probably presumptuous of me to open a topic on my second posting, but as I indicated in my introductory post I'm struggling with the prospect of global sea rises as I look to buy property in Thailand. I'm wondering how members who take the latest scientific projections seriously confront and deal with this issue. I'm thinking, for instance of the recent projection from climate central at https://coastal.climatecentral.org/map/8/101.4654/11.8343/?theme=sea_level_rise&map_type=coastal_dem_comparison&elevation_model=coastal_dem&forecast_year=2050&pathway=rcp45&percentile=p50&return_level=return_level_1&slr_model=kopp_2014.
I find this enough to rule out Bangkok entirely (though I'm amazed at the building boom there) but wonder about the future of areas like the royal coast. I don't consider climate central to be wildly alarmist. I think they are conservative since they don't try to factor in such scenarios as arctic and antarctic glacial melt or other tipping events. Nor do I think a 30 year projection suddenly occurs on the last day of the 29th year. I welcome your thoughts.
- 1
- 1
- 2
kissing
in ASEAN NOW Community Pub
Posted
I couldn't agree more. This is what I want to understand better. It is particularly opaque when the brash opposite is on display. In fact the same person can move from the one to the other.