placeholder

Did you notice that the author of the article you cited claims that his source was the Forbes article. And yet the Forbes article says nothing of the kind. Gullible much?

What makes impulse's comment particularly ridiculous is that it's widely known that Biden has publicly released decades of his tax returns.

When someone repeatedly makes empty and baiting generalizations about liberals, I think the suspicion is clearly justified.

It says a lot about you and nothing about me that you asked me a question and then answered it yourself. A truly low and discreditable tactic. I've actually answered this question many times with links as above. Anyway, here is a link again, https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2020/10/22/how-the-bidens-earned-167-million-after-leaving-the-white-house/?sh=1c14eda81e42 I suspect you're going to evaporate now but who knows, you may stick around and actually apologize.

For those of us who prefer to use credible sources, here is a link to an explanation of where Joe Biden's wealth comes from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2020/10/22/how-the-bidens-earned-167-million-after-leaving-the-white-house/?sh=1c14eda81e42

It's an entirely expected phenomenon that you would actually posit this as a fact. It's of a piece with your other empty and baiting generalizations.

One might and one would be wrong.

Once again, you need some schooling: Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source. https://aseannow.com/forum/158-world-news/ Put up or...

We have plenty of evidence of your real position. And it's clearly hard right wing. Your silly and baiting generalizations about liberals is proof enough of that.

If you actually bothered to do even a cursory investigation of Biden's income you would find that it's all been legitimately accounted for. But I guess you would rather indulge in empty speculation.

Well, a deserved scolding is not the same as belittling, degrading, or demeaning. Trump may feel humiliated, but that's on him. The judge's warning to Trump was clearly legitimate. The judge is not responsible for Trump's feelings.

I don't think so. He's required to face a jury of his peers, but it's not a jury until all have been selected and sworn in.

"I dislike Trump and believe he acts inappropriately on occasion." "Inappropriately"? I see you're taking the gloves off. And "on occasion" to describe how frequently he behaves in such a manner? Now you've gone too far. Please dial it down a lot or some of us might question your claimed status of being a "neutral" observer.

And exactly how has this judge demeaned, degraded, or belittled Trump?

Of course, to accept that statement we would have to agree that you do possess such credibility.

Baiting who? Donald Trump? Is he a member of aseannow.com? Can you share with us what name he is posting under?

All you can offer is an empty and unproven right wing generalization in response to my specific explanation of why it has taken so long for the trial to be scheduled. It is laughable that you call yourself a "neutral" observer. In fact, the judge gave neither side what they asked for.

Clearly you don't know that the reason that the trial didn't take place much earlier is that Trump's legal team kept on filing frivolous motions which were repeatedly denied but were time consuming. And the ridiculous to delay the trial for 3 years is of a piece with that.

I'm pretty sure Clark Kent and Lois Lane were two members of the grand jury in Washington.

Effectively state control? Buriisma had the prosecutor in its pocket. The Chinese company had a government contract? Didn't that company go bankrupt? That's your reasoning? Wasn't the CEO of this company ultimately jailed on corruption charges?

Not at all. You vilified almost 4 million people based on the actions of a few. I just pointed out at the same kind of reasoning could have applied to the Irish back when.

It wasn't the spending it was the tax cuts. Big tax breaks for the wealthy

Just to show you how links work. In this case a link to the landing page of the World Forum where you'll find the rule I quoted. Apparently, you are either unfamiliar with that rule or don't understand it. To put it in a nutshell it means "Put up or..." Share a link that leads to a credible source that backs up your claim that "There are recordings (and public appearances) of Biden committing crimes and confessing to crimes! "

Somebody else needs a reminder that this is not the Fiction Forum: Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source. https://aseannow.com/forum/158-world-news/

So, were Trump to die suddenly, then he's fair game? An interesting reversal on the old saying which yields De mortis nihil nisi malum ([Speak} nothing but ill of the dead)