placeholder

First off, I didn't quote you saying anything. But if you want a quote from you, here's one: "Anymore talk of covid mandates from biden will only make Trump more popular." What's really not nice is falsely accusing someone of lying.

Vaccines used to take years to develop but back when, not possible to read DNA or RNA. Within a month of reporting the existence of the virus, there was a full RNA model available. And all the testing was done but much of it on a simultaneous basis. There is now a huge medical database.

Well, you've made an assertion. Now back it with actual evidence or reasoning.

In the case in question, according to evenkeel, it would be an official order to get vaccinated. What do you think you proved?

Yes, she will benefit from what you claim is Biden's hidden agenda to impose a vaccine mandate.

What makes this particularly amusing is that Trump supporters have been claiming that Joe Biden is turning America into a banana republic.

The guy who always "had such great respect for the office of the President and the Presidency" is the same guy who also took over leadership of the birther movement. Laughable.

I think you should really look up what mandate means. There are plenty of government programs that you may choose not to participate in or don't approve of. Are they mandates, too?

I repeat: for there to be more talk from Biden about mandates they're actually has to be some first. Making an assertion based on prediction is a falsehood.

Tesla's fast charges have a very high favorability score and they've just opened them up to users of other EV's.

Well, according to a recent study from Recurring Auto that analyzed charging data from over 12,500 Tesla vehicles in the United States, the rate of range degradation is statistically similar when compared to AC charging. The company, which provides vehicle and battery analysis reports for EVs, compared cars that fast charge at least 90 percent of the time to cars that fast charge less than 10 percent of the time, and the results show little to no difference between the two charging methods. The charts below show the percentage of the original range as shown on the cars’ dashboards – in this case, the Tesla Model 3 and Tesla Model Y – and the number of days. https://insideevs.com/news/683961/fast-charging-vs-slow-charging-study-ev-range-degradation/

False. In fact over half the the models were unreasonably accurate. Their algorithms produce results that are statistically insignificant from the actual measured reality.

Before there can be "anymore" talk from Biden proposing mandates, there has to be some. Can you share with us a link to any talk from Biden proposing mandates?

I'm giving you exactly as much detailed information as you gave Danderman when you posted a link in reply to his question, (see below) The difference is that my link actually leads to relevant information. Whereas the link you posted led to information that was utterly irrelevant to the question asked.

Still spreading falsehoods? Biden's income and wealth has been adequately explained again and again. https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2021/06/10/heres-how-much-joe-biden-is-worth/?sh=5d5d0d57461b He has also released his tax returns since 1998 https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/oct/31/joe-biden/yes-joe-biden-has-released-22-years-tax-returns-on/

I agree. Name calling only cheapens arguments and makes them suspect. If you have confidence in facts, they should be enough to damn your target.

Totally corrupt yet taking on Big Pharma? Actually the bill would have been a lot stronger were it not for 2 DINOs named Sinema and Manchin. It's also interesting to recall that the previous occupant of the White House campaigned on this as well, but he abandoned that promise even before he was inaugurated. https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/471735-trump-draws-ire-after-retreat-on-drug-prices-pledge/ Just keeping that swamp full.

Can you please share with us what scheme that might be. The evidence is overwhelming that it wasn't Burisma. An FBI source, a Burisma deal, the Bidens and details that don’t match up https://archive.ph/Cm4ty https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/30/an-fbi-source-burisma-deal-bidens-details-that-dont-match-up/ And what evidence is there that Joe Biden acted on behalf of the Chinese? Given how much harsher US policy towards the Chinese has been during his tenure, you'd think the Chinese govt would be in a strong position to blackmail him if they had anything on him. We also know that Kushner, unlike Hunter Biden, was a very high level govt official whose special purview was the Mideast. . And while he was a govt official, the Qatar govt participated in a deal to bail out the Kushner family from a disastrous investment made by Jared Kushner. The deal made no business sense. It was clearly a sweetheart deal. And once Kushner left office, At MbS' orders, Saudi Arabia invested 2 billion dollars with Kushner despite the Saudi investment council being in opposition to entrusting 2 billion dollars to someone who had a record of failure. Not just that, it is also sleazy that the Saudis invested 1 billion with Steve Mnuchin, the former Secretary of the Treasury. But at least he has a record as a savvy and successful investor. Yet, MbS invested twice as much with Kushner.

Still waiting for the punchline.

"In tests taken by several Japanese government agencies and Tepco, the water released starting last week contained scant amounts of tritium, far below the standard set by the World Health Organization. There is more tritium in water being discharged by nuclear power plants in China and in South Korea, where protesters have also condemned the Japanese release." https://archive.ph/GRokN https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/31/world/asia/china-fukushima-water-protest.html

It's clear you don't understand what that means. Let me help you. When climatologists built their models, they plugged in numbers for CO2 that were future estimates. They couldn't know how much emissions there were actually going to be. When forcings were plugged into their models, they turned out to be very accurate.

It's in the original research. I've given you a link.

Here's the link to the original research. It explains why the models were chosen. It is, in fact, a very complete survey. No cherry picking was involved. https://eps.harvard.edu/files/eps/files/hausfather_2020_evaluating_historical_gmst_projections.pdf

But insulting women for their looks is okay? From Megyn to Mika: A Timeline of Trump’s Attacks on Women’s Appearances Trump has a history of insulting women based on their appearances and it has continued throughout his presidential campaign and presidency. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lists/trump-sexist-timeline-insults-attacks-women-appearances-1018198/

I agree. In a political disagreement fat-shaming is beyond the pale and no one should support a politician who engages in such low behavior. Trump Responds to Chris Christie Attacks With … Fat Jokes The former president couldn't resist getting in the gutter after the former New Jersey governor went after him during a New Hampshire town hall event https://archive.ph/QX1WS