placeholder

Well, if anyone is being dishonest here it's you lying to yourself. You have to be in deep denial not to accept that Trump has b Any rational person seeing someone posing holding a bat up close to another photo of a person he has made no bones about hating, wouldn't have any problem seeing that it's an endorsement of violence. Especially when posted so closely in time with predictions of death and destruction. Keep in mind that it was Trump who chose to repost that photo. The press didn't force him to do that.

Actually, you didn't ask me the question. But asking for a general statement about the media lying in this context is just a deflection. Did the media lie about Trump posting that photo? Did it lie about Trump prophesying death and destruction?

The realism isn't the issue. The fact is that in his mind and apparently the minds of his supporters, it's okay to be in such a picture. What kind of message does that send?

Making up quotes to smear someone? Youir comment is truly Trumpworthy.

The image clearly show that Trump is okay with actively taking part in death and destruction. So his death and destruction talk is not just a prediction of the inevitable but something it's okay to be part of it. I wish I could find it hard to believe that millions of Americans are okay with an ex-President posing in such a picture. There was a time not long ago when I would have reckoned it to be an impossibility.

Does Trump make it a practice to have photos of him taken holding a baseball bat. Are you seriously suggesting it's just a coincidence that he happened to be hold a bat next to a juxtaposed image of Bragg's head? Trump once boasted that he could shoot someone on 5th Ave, and his supporters wouldn't care. Comments like yours definitely lend weight to that assertion.

In other words, you've got nothing.

In that case, I'm going to copyright it.

I thought it was my bank robbery analogy? I guess you have the prior claim.

So are you denying that there are videos of the rioters storming the Capitol? Or are you still trying to claim because some is behaving peacefully at one point in time, that must mean that they were behaving peacefully before, as well?

If someone robs a bank and there's a video of him 1 hour later taking a stroll down the street, how is that video evidence that he didn't commit a crime? The police were being friendly out of self-interest. They were in no position to be hostile.

The police were greatly outnumbered. Had they tried to make arrests, it's unlikely that would have ended well for them. We have already seen what violence the rioters were capable of when they stormed the Capitol The police were making the best of a bad situation.

All of it? That's about 41,000 hours. Have you come back from the future to report to us what you saw?

If you like that image, you'll love snuff films. And he's pretty much sh*tting on himself.

As the old saying goes, "One picture is worth a thousand death threats."

That's a good question to google.

"Despite President Barack Obama’s talk of a “red line” should the al-Assad government use chemical weapons in Syria, it was only under President Donald Trump that the first direct attacks against the Syrian government were conducted. After a chemical attack killed 88 people in Idlib province, US forces fired cruise missiles in April 2017 at a base believed to have been where the chemical attack was launched from. A US-led attack was also launched in April 2018 after a chemical attack in the opposition-held town of Douma." https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/8/24/why-does-us-still-forces-syria-explainer

"President Donald Trump’s decision to send troops to protect oil fields in Syria means the U.S. may have as many troops in the country — or potentially more — as when he took office, undermining his repeated pledge to end a “forever war” in the Middle East. Commanders are now moving additional forces and armored vehicles into Syria’s war-torn, oil-rich Deir ez-Zor province. Some are being sent to reoccupy bases they abandoned just last week, after Trump abruptly ordered them to pull out from the area. Pentagon leaders have yet to announce how many troops will stay in the country under the new oil field defense mission." https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/31/trump-syria-oil-field-mission-062510

Cherry-picking much? https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/biden-approval-rating/?cid=rrpromo

It could be that the Iranians are making trouble for America in solidarity with or at the request of Russia.

I love it. You're linking to a website that denies the theory of evolution. The supports the notion that the Biblical account of creation is true. Thanks for the laugh. Here's a link to the science https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/10/211020135914.htm

I thought you were referring to all of Trump's legal travails and not just to the weakest case against him.

As already noted, the judge who is overlooking the investigation into the documents case at Mar a Lago actually ruled that lawyer-client privilege is a non-starter in this case because there's a there's a "prima facie showing that the former president had committed criminal violations",. It takes very powerful evidence to undermine the lawyer-client privilege. And the appeals court supported her judgement. Trump's lawyer then declined to take it to the Supreme Court. Does this tell you anything? https://abcnews.go.com/US/sources-special-counsel-claims-trump-deliberately-misled-attorneys/story?id=98024191

The judge in the Mar-A-Lago case ruled that there is a is a prima facie case that there is an underlying crime. The appellate Court wasted no time in supporting her judgment. Trump's lawyer has decided not to appeal to the supreme Court. Does that tell you anything?

What's that got to do with whether you live in an apartment or freestanding home?