Danderman123

I will let the prosecution explain it all to you next week.

Pathetic Trump Chickens Out of Testifying in Hush-Money Trial

How old are you? Trump posts a Nazi slogan and your defense is how I described his deplorable behavior. Why aren't you condemning his post? Do you agree with it? Trump social media account shares video mentioning "unified reich;" Biden blasts "Hitler's language"

You have an active imagination.

Trump shares video suggesting his victory will bring 'unified Reich' Are you saying this is a false report? If it's true, why aren't you condemning it?

Because writing it on the Internet doesn't count, only if he says it. Of course, if he says it, then: It's a joke It's only for one day It doesn't count unless it's in German Trump campaign deletes ‘unified Reich’ post after widespread backlash Even the Trump campaign knows it was a mistake, why don't you?

Trump posts video referencing ‘unified Reich’ if reelected

That's a conspiracy theory started in Russia.

Trump’s social media account shares a campaign video with a headline about a ‘unified Reich’

I wonder how many posts here come from Russia.

I posted a link that describes everything. Trump is posting about a Unified Reich, and you don't care. Interesting.

James Comey recognized Trump's behavior as that of a mob boss.

So, how about that Trump defense? Anyone think their questioning of Robert Costello exonerated Trump?

Is that important to you? Are you really suggesting that posting on Truth Social about a Unified Reich is not a bad thing?

Prosecutors are now showing the jury each of the seven monthly checks Michael Cohen received in 2017 from the Trump Organization totaling $420,000, reimbursement primarily for fronting the money to silence Stormy Daniels.

Trump posted a video on Truth Social calling the country a 'unified reich' if he wins

Are you suggesting that Trump was lying?

A comment on this: The instructions that doesn't require a jury to agree on which underlying crime is to be considered makes sense. If a felony conviction were to require that a jury agree on a single underlying crime, in the event that a mob boss committed a boatload of underlying crimes, he could get off if the jury couldn't agree on a single underlying crime.

If you don't know what the term "Reich" means in a political contest, that explains a lot. Please don't respond by saying that Hitler wasn't all bad, that's Trump's line

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

In other words, you know that Trump's defense screwed up with Costello. When Michael Cohen knew he was in legal trouble, he contacted Costello about his legal services. But newly revealed emails from Costello show that Trump's concern was stopping Cohen from testifying. Not exactly the instincts of an innocent man.

The jury does not have to agree on the specific underlying crime. The Prosecution alleges 3 separate underlying crimes, but the jury only has to agree that there was an underlying crime.

No need to give you a statute that Michael Cohen pled guilty to. I have repeatedly explained the difference between a campaign finance violation and a campaign mislabeling a campaign expenditure. Yes,I know you are going to troll more. Tell you what: Robert Costello was the Defense's star witness, how did he do?

Nothing screams "evil" like a candidate pitching a "Unified Reich".

You are lying. § 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree. A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof. Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony. Concealing and aiding this crime: The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, Title 52, United States Code, Section 30101, et seq., (the “Election Act”), regulates the influence of money on politics. At all relevant times, the Election Act set certain limitations and prohibitions, among them: (a) individual contributions to any presidential candidate, including expenditures coordinated with a candidate or his political committee, were limited to $2,700 per election, and presidential candidates and their committees were prohibited from accepting contributions from individuals in excess of this limit; and (b) Corporations were prohibited from making contributions directly to presidential candidates, including expenditures coordinated with candidates or their committees, and candidates were prohibited from accepting corporate contributions. Trump is hosed unless there is a juror who holds out.