Danderman123

The climate that supported development of our civilization is changing - which means there are going to be ramifications all over the globe. Let me paraphrase you: "The river that provides water to our city has dried up!" KhunLA: "No problem, it also dried up in the days of the dinosaurs".

Trump disagrees with you: Trump lies that Jan. 6 was ‘an insurrection caused by Nancy Pelosi’

If wishes were horses, then beggars could ride.

Everything you say is subjectively true. But, let's say someone lied about Biden, and claimed that he was aiding insurrectionists. Would that be enough for a Republican judge to disqualify Biden? There is a clear legal standard: a jury decides facts. No jury has convicted Trump of insurrection. Yet.

She doesn't earn enough to make her car payments, buy gas and pay for a room. If she could live with a man, problem solved.

The problem comes in determining the facts required for disqualification. In the case of the Civil War insurrectionists, it was easy - they joined the rebel army. No need for further proof. But with Trump, his lawyers are simply denying everything, and without a jury conviction for sedition, there is no proof he was an insurrectionist. The Supremes will explain further.

A lady taxi driver I know in Pattaya is homeless, living in her car. From what I gather, she doesn't like men (or women), so it's difficult for her to establish permanent living quarters.

Ironic placement of these two stories. If only there were some empty place where homeless could stay....

18 year olds can go into bars in Thailand, they just can't drink.

To determine whether Trump engaged in an insurrection, a jury must convict Trump. Failing a jury verdict, legally, Trump is not an insurrectionist, regardless of appearances. It's like calling someone a murderer who hasn't been tried yet.

I would agree with you - if someone had bothered to convict Trump of sedition in the past.

The SCOTUS is currently considering the 14th amendment case. Based on the questioning, it looks like this is going to be a 6-3 verdict favoring Trump.

Are you being sarcastic? Your chart shows the impact of Biden's tax plan as well as the recovery from Covid.

Trump's plan to delay the January 6 case likely means the trial will proceed in August or September. After the Manhattan trial. So, voters in November will have his convictions fresh in their minds when they vote. I'm pretty sure that no one is going to change their votes after Trump has racked up multiple convictions, but some potential Trump voters will stay home. After the results of the second trial, even some of the Trump fluffers here will disappear. But, if you ask them today if they will cease to post Trump propaganda here after the second trial results in a conviction, their response would be "Trump won't be convicted".

Your post seems to be part of a classic troll: you throw out a link to a misleading story, simply to muddy the waters. Of course you know the linked story is bogus, but your intent is to confuse some people about the Trump theft of classified documents. If I am wrong, explain why your linked opinion is correct.

Sure I do. https://www.investopedia.com/taxes/trumps-tax-reform-plan-explained/ "The top rate fell from 39.6% to 37%, while the 33% bracket dropped to 32%, the 28% bracket to 24%, the 25% bracket to 22%, and the 15% bracket to 12%. The lowest bracket remained at 10%, and the 35% bracket was also unchanged.". However, there were other facets of the Trump tax plan: "In the spring of 2019, many taxpayers were surprised to find that they had to pay more taxes than in the previous year. Others received significantly lower refund checks from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), even though their financial circumstances hadn't changed."

The source is not the issue. The issue is that Jarrett is wrong. So wrong that no part of his lies will be used by the Trump legal team. Jarrett's lies are aimed at the rubes, not a jury.

This Jarrett guy completely lied about the laws concerning retention of presidential documents. But let me ask you: what part of his lies do you think were the most compelling defense of Trump?

If Biden can't keep it together, he will replaced by the Democratic convention. Biden faces a lot of opportunities to demonstrate he is still capable between now and the convention. If Trump declines further, he still will get the nomination.

All it will take is the Trump billionaire tax cuts to expire next year. I doubt any Congress will extend them.

Perhaps the seemingly growing number of gay people is a factor.

The Trump fans can't sense how this year is going to proceed. One hit after another on Trump's chances, as the Dems coalesce around Joe Biden. If Biden wins, everyone knows he will depart after his 2nd term ends. If Trump wins, he's going to try to be president for life. Everyone understands that, which is one of the reasons that Trump will lose.

In the last 24 hours, I have read some pretty crazy posts from Trump fans: "Trump was charged with possession of classified documents, but that shouldn't be a crime". I am sure Reality Winner would agree. "Biden and Trump both had classified documents. It doesn't matter that Biden gave them back as soon as they were discovered, and Trump hid his documents and wouldn't give them back". These are not great criminal defenses. Nor are these useful for winning independent voters.

No, I flew out of LAX. No outgoing passport controls. But zero passport controls walking across the border - outbound

You are referring to illegal-on-illegal crime? You are probably correct that illegals who are crime victims probably don't report the crime in most cases.