Danderman123

You could be right, but let's see a link.

When I left the USA, I didn't fill out a census form, and so, I wasn't counted.

It's such a crisis at the border that the Republicans are delaying action until 2025.

The conversation is about the potential appeal of the gigantic punitive award in the second defamation case. It's hypothetical.

This is the post that you responded to: "I expect such a review will consider the defamation that Trump continued to heap on Carroll, even while in in court and in earshot of the jury. It’s not a punitive damage award for a first offense against Carroll, it’s an award for continuing defamation after having first been found liable by the court for defamation. The punitive damages were stepped up as a direct result of Trump’s continuing defamation." Your allusion to the 14th Amendment case makes me think you've lost the plot. We're talking about the Defamation case.

So when Somchai leaves Thailand to pick berries in Finland, how is he counted?

crime rate for illegals in the USA is less than the general population crime rate.

No worries, some of Trump's billionaire tax cuts will expire next year.

Read what? I just gave my opinion on some easy steps to reduce income disparity in the US.

The post you responded to contained facts that are not in dispute.

I normally would agree with you that large punitive damage awards are normally chewed up by appeals courts ............ but, in this case, as noted above, Trump was punished for his continued defaming of Ms. Carroll after the first verdict. So, the jury concluded that a much larger verdict might shut Trump up. Which it did. By no longer defaming E. Jean Carroll after the $83 million award, Trump has perfectly supported the award amount. Let's say an appeals court chops the second award down to $10 million, and then Trump starts defaming Ms. Carroll again. Does the Appeals court have to say they are sorry? Probably, there would further litigation, and an even bigger award, and then an appeal to reduce the award. What does the Appeals court do then? Increase the award? The award to the plaintiff has got to be big enough to protect her from future defamation.

Some of tge Trump fluffers here would go to jail for Trump in an instant. But, clearly Judge Engoron is thrashing about in an unprecedented situation, as a key witness thinks about pleading to perjury in the trial. Perhaps the Trump fans here have some advice. Nope, no independent thought from them, if its not in a talking point, they can't post it. So, my opinion is that Engoron has to work around Weisselberg and make a decision.

https://silverstateelection.nv.gov/nvother/index.shtml As usual, you are wrong. Joe Biden took 89% in a crowded field. Not "close" and not "unopposed".

An opinion piece about data is not the same as data. How about FBI data? All you are saying now is the official data doesn't back you up.

Yes, this is not the long awaited appeal of the first verdict. BTW, the appeal of the second verdict is on hold, due to technical issues.

Here's a fact: Joe Biden just won the Nevada primary.

Tell us more about this increase in crime. Do you have any data to back up your opinion? Or are you just repeating mindless talking points?

If you take out the bad parts, Trump looks pretty good.

Trump loses bid for mistrial in E. Jean Carroll case Mostly denied because Trump's lawyers were incompetent, or deliberately sabotaging Trump.

Or whoever counts population made a mistake. Or maybe Covid killed a lot more than was known at the time. Since Covid primarily killed old people, maybe Social Security is okay.

Are you trying to convince people that you can't read? Biden returned the documents immediately. Trump hid the documents. Please tell me you don't agree, or that you are just trolling. Because that's just what this place needs - trolls.

What criminal charges are you suggesting should be used against Biden?

Trump had the authority to send material through the declaffication pipeline. He had done so for some materials, but neglected to declassify the documents he stole.

Because Karlson is a useful idiot.

There wasn't a war between the US and the USSR, either. You seem confused which side you are on.