Danderman123

On 8/10/2023 at 8:48 AM, JonnyF said:

Well it's certainly having a catastrophic effect on humanity.????

 

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsj.com%2Farticles%2Fclimate-activists-disasters-fire-storms-deaths-change-cop26-glasgow-global-warming-11635973538&psig=AOvVaw147WomOkGkRQHWKsazKSic&ust=1691718453404000&source=images&cd=vfe&opi=89978449&ved=0CBMQjhxqFwoTCPCz5r380IADFQAAAAAdAAAAABAE

 

 

 

It's almost as if someone launched weather satellites so that people would be warned of imminent climate disasters.

On 8/10/2023 at 9:34 AM, JonnyF said:

It's because they share the same end game.

 

Big state control. High taxation (redistribution of wealth) under the guise of green taxes. Diminishing rights for citizens. 

 

Climate alarmism is a wonderful tool for all 3. It's no coinicidence that members of the doomsday cult are always left wing.

and those scientists who predicted the current warming 40 years ago were just lucky.

17 hours ago, Screaming said:

All this climate hysteria is nonsense. The earth' climate including carbon dioxide has been changing for millions of years. There are natural sources of atmospheric carbon dioxide, such as outgassing from the ocean, decomposing vegetation and other biomass, venting volcanoes, naturally occurring wildfires, and even belches from ruminant animals. These natural sources of carbon dioxide are offset by “sinks”—things like photosynthesis by plants on land and in the ocean, direct absorption into the ocean, and the creation of soil and peat. The sample size taken by scientists to proselytize their "Climate Change" hysteria is too small to validate any observations of the millions of years of data.

 

An interesting book, "Determining Sample Size and Power in Research Studies" will point out the importance of sample size for desired accuracy in estimation and in hypothesis testing experiments for a desired effect size.

Because thousands of climate scientists and agencies around the workd are wrong, and your kniwledge is superior to them.

And it was a lucky guess by them 40 years ago that the planet would be warming now.

5 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

The more rational know that it is just summer.

I own a table grape farm in California. Climate change now causes winters to be so warm that the grapes aren't sweet anymore.

13 hours ago, JonnyF said:

So in conclusion.

 

1. The planet might be getting warmer.

2. The planet's climate has always changed. You may have heard of the ice age. I believe that occured before humans were having any effect.

3. If it is getting warmer, it is minimal and we cannot prove that is due to humans.

4. Even though it might be getting warmer, there are far fewer climate related deaths than ever since we have the technology to cope with the change.

5. Techonology is changing far quicker than the climate.

 

So what's the panic? Oh that's right, it's a great excuse to push through other agendas such as higher taxes, more state control, fewer rights for citizens. That almost sounds like a socialist agenda. Who'd a thunk it?

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-22069768

 

 

No wonder there's such a high correlation between Left wing ideology and climate alarmism. And people are starting to see it. The game's up.

Nope.

The planet is warming significantly, due to human emissions, with no end in sight.

12 hours ago, Longwood50 said:

 

This notion that you can look at the past 100 to 200 years and somehow use it as "normal" is just ridiculous.  The earth has warmed and cooled for millions of years.  

There is a perfrect correlation between the per capita spending on cheese and died being hung in their own bedsheets.  

This idea that somehow that correlations human made carbon emission with climate change is just as spurious.  It is a correlation, not a proven correlation. 




What is the mid Holocene warm period?

 

 

Mid-Holocene Warm Period – About 6,000 Years Ago

Paleoclimatologists have long suspected that the "middle Holocene," a period roughly from 7,000 to 5,000 years ago, was warmer than the present day.Nov 12, 2564 BE

 

Wow. You really don't understand this stuff.

We have been in a cooling trend for 8,000 years. Except, there is a warming trend due to human emissions over the past few decades.

You can ask your internet friends why the stratosphere is cooling, but they won't answer you.

9 hours ago, Longwood50 said:

That says what they don't believe it to be caused by solar activity.  That doesn't say it is definitively proven to be caused by carbon emmissions.  In 1800 there were 1 billion people on earth.  There are now 8 billion.  So is it carbon emmissions.  

The fact that the CO2 emmissions are the highest, and temperatures are rising is a CORRELATION.  

The number of Pizza's consumed in the world is the highest in 2 million years to.  Does that prove that pizza consumption caused global warming.  No. 

Again, the earth has wamed and then gone through glacial periods for millions of years.  You ignore the fact that warming and cooling as EVIDENCED is a natural phenomena.  If and I repeat if the earth reverses and begins to cool towards a glacial period would you then equally suggest it is carbon emmission that caused the cooling? 

Correlation is valid if there is a mechanism to explain the correlation.

In this case, perhaps you can explain why the stratosphere is cooking.

I am so sorry that your internet friends have not given you talking points to answer this.

On 7/28/2023 at 8:31 AM, Skipalongcassidy said:

The facts debunk this report as false... the 1930's were far hotter... the 1970's were far cooler... 

1934 was the hottest year on record for the USA, but nit the entire planet.

You are misinformed.

8 hours ago, Longwood50 said:

That says what they don't believe it to be caused by solar activity.  That doesn't say it is definitively proven to be caused by carbon emmissions.  In 1800 there were 1 billion people on earth.  There are now 8 billion.  So is it carbon emmissions.  

The fact that the CO2 emmissions are the highest, and temperatures are rising is a CORRELATION.  

The number of Pizza's consumed in the world is the highest in 2 million years to.  Does that prove that pizza consumption caused global warming.  No. 

Again, the earth has wamed and then gone through glacial periods for millions of years.  You ignore the fact that warming and cooling as EVIDENCED is a natural phenomena.  If and I repeat if the earth reverses and begins to cool towards a glacial period would you then equally suggest it is carbon emmission that caused the cooling? 

The last Interglacial Maximum was 8,000 years ago. We have been cooling ever since.

But, now there is warming, despite the historical cooling trend.

4 minutes ago, ICU Kid said:

Maybe just split the country in half now.

It's gonna happen anyway - Trumptards to the South / Lib tards to the north.

 

Pick a side

 

x

We already had a civil war. Your side lost.

34 minutes ago, ICU Kid said:

Trump revealed the Deep State for all to see, and kept the US out of War.

Biden...has done nothing whatsoever positive.  Not a single thing.

 

Maybe you think Trump was incompetent in hiring people. 

Or maybe he was deep state all along. 

They're both valid arguments.

 

Let me give you another one, probably closer to reality: 

THERE ARE NO GOOD PEOPLE TO HIRE.

 

Don't like that answer?  Fair enough. 

Tell me who he should have hired. 

Name them.    

 

 

Tell me about our soldiers fighting in Syria during the Trump administration.....

or the soldiers killed in Niger.

6 minutes ago, ArnieP said:

Sounds great ????

Yeah, plenty of bargirls in Nirun condos. And you get to meet their boyfriends.

3 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

are they BJ bars or gentleman clubs?

Kind of blurring the lines on Soi Bonkot 8.

On 7/31/2023 at 2:48 PM, TimeMachine said:

If you wanna get laid often,  live at Nirun. Lots of wonderful girls there. 

I know a bunch of bargirls who live in Nirun.

Also, many of the ladies who work at the BJ bars on Soi Bonkot 8 live in Nirun.

13 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

 

 

Trump goes about trying to get the wall built, and the left does everything possible to stop construction, yet he still got over 400 miles of it built. 

 

 

The vast majority of the 458 miles were constructed in places where some kind of barrier already existed