Morch

What...like cheer-leading Hamas? No, i don't believe I have. Why do you ask? Your 'opinion' doesn't bear much connection to reality.

Indeed. Also, sometimes this works it 'our' favor (less papers required) - don't recall anyone ever complaining about that.

We were doing this (well, nominally) for several years. Pretty much what @BritManToo and @lopburi3 said. I guess it all depends on the specific IO. Luckily, ours is very laid back, no hassles. MiL never had to go to the IO, even. Signed the papers and we dealt with them. They were even aware we're renting another place, but never really pursued the matter. Now MiL lives with us, in the our new house. First IO visit they were a bit confused about it....

Your hyperbole aside, how do you explain all them donor countries taking the evidence presented rather seriously?

Are they military?

800 out of how many? Of which rank? Of which departments?

@ozimoron Clearly how? And why specifically Lebanon? It is only a thing if one wishes to reach no agreement, ever. You can't have a two-state solution, and try to snick in a one-state solution at the same time.

They were offered that in the past. They refused. More than once. Your offer is neither 'fair', nor got much to do with reality.

Other than in your imagination Zionists does not mean militants.

@ozimoron Maybe you'd like Hamas's next attack to be more successful. Maybe it irks you that Western countries aren't Hamas supporters.

Didn't really work out, did it?

@ozimoron You lie. I have posted numerous times, on these discussions and past time, that they ought to. And Zionists does not equate with objecting-to-a-Palestinain-State. This is just you putting your ignorance on display.

You go and on about Israel, the IDF and what not. Your comment about 7/10? That's it's not in a vacuum. Apparently, in your mind, the Israeli response is.

All of your wannabe 'pro-palestinian' supporters whine about the IDF. Not so much about Hamas, but that's how you are. The point is, all this whining - and not much by way of realistic views as to how things should have been handled.

@ozimoron Nah, just you making up stuff about other posters. You guys do your best to go off topic on each and every one posted. For you, it's lets-talk-about-anything, preferably Israel, but not about Hamas, not about 7/10.

Hamas could have (a) not carry out the attack (b) negotiate for the release of the hostages, with acceptable terms (c) surrender (d) accept a deal in which Hamas's leaders in Gaza are exiled All of these options were discussed on media and on this forum. Whether you're not aware of them (after insisting you follow events) or just trolling - don't know, don't care. Hamas leadership said the civilians are 'necessary casualties', not Hamas men. Hamas men enjoy protection and supplies the civilians do not get. Any other nonsense you're having difficulties with?

How is that not an excuse?

Timeline. It's a thing. And no, not all of the sanctions were reversed by Biden. That's not true.

What 'relationship' would you be referencing? What MSM talking points are you on about? I do have trouble finding proper hats. Got an ugly head. It's very sad.

Hamas could have and can, stop the war at any time. Somehow, you seem to feel that Israel is responsible for that as well. Hamas leaders are on record saying the casualties in Gaza are 'necessary sacrifices' for 'the cause'. Guess that's on Israel as well, eh?

These topics aren't about 'what took place decades or centuries ago. You want to make excuses for the 7/10 attack, go right ahead.

You can post whatever nonsense you like, and I will keep pointing out it's nonsense. I do not feel you have addressed anything, that's just you saying you have. You have not explained anything, you claim you have. It's not 'harassment' to address you false comments, notions and statements. Other than in your mind, there is no requirement that I come up with items we could discuss. Given that you deny basic facts, or hold unto false ones, there's little to 'discuss' with you. I have pointed out to several issues in your 'proposal'. You wish to ignore them? Up to you. Was not really expecting you'd address things in any coherent or reasonable manner.

Assad was not supported by all the Arab countries, neighboring or otherwise. Syria was initially suspended from the Arab League, if not mistaken. Other ME countries supplied and supported various groups fighting against Assad's regime. As for 'elected government' - I doubt you really believe this, or that young Assad actually generated them inflated support ratings. I don't think you're in a position to call others' mashed potato brains, but up to you. No idea what you're on with the last bit, but I agree with your closing remark. Glad you're taking some time off. Get well soon.

Read your previous post, which I was replying to. Them figure out the context. Tiresome troll.

You could have used any other source for that map. You chose one that's a clear Palestinian propaganda meme. Hard to take your claims seriously when you act like that. So no, I do not 'disregard' the other 'maps' - you put it up, it's on you. Could have used any other resource - chose that. The map you drew is utter nonsense. No other way to define it. It does not relate to demographics, geography, economy or history. It's got nothing to do with anything. It's a display of ignorance. Considering that there are plenty of more streamlined offers, yours doesn't improve on any of them, just creates more issues. Your nonsense 'differentiation' were addressed. You wish to remain ignorant - that's up to you. You've no idea what you're talking about. Zionists are not of one mettle, and do not share the same unified vision/goal/policy as Hamas does. You are misrepresenting views and positions, and doing so repeatedly. What you write above is not an 'explanation' it's a host of nonsense statements that do not relate to facts and reality. I have raised plenty of issues with regard to your views and posts, you do not need to be spoon-fed them, they are quite obvious.