Morch

Well, the Democrats obviously 'rigged' the Grammy Award thing....Or something.

Sometimes there are no great options. I don't see how doing nothing would be an improvement.

How many of them were Hamas men?

@retarius And as usual, not a word about Hamas. It's all Israel.

"take all measures within its power" That's a reference to relevant international law, which recognizes the limits of precautions and acknowledged uninvolved people may die in wars. If the ICJ's ruling was what the other poster have claimed, there would have been a clear order to stop the fighting. There was not such.

@ozimoron Your original claim was wider. You've just move the goalposts, as you often do when you can't back up your statements.

Support for that?

Almost an hour since this was posted, and not a single better-looking-girls-at-7/11 comment. She's a winner!

@thaibeachlovers IMO, you do not have any figures which could support that. I think that you overestimate the former, and underestimate the latter.

@thaibeachlovers It's enough if a bunch of them would vote (as opposed to not voting at all).

@ozimoron There were several links on here, citing experts (not wannabe ones like yourself) opining Israel took more measures to protect civilian lives than most armies do or would. If Israel had disregarded this, there would be no warnings, no time to evacuate, no hospitals left intact, and a whole lot more civilian casualties. You do not decide war crimes, and you have but a propagandist notion of what these imply. The ICJ did not actually order Israel to stop - that's your misleading version of things. You and others who keep going on about 'proportionate' cannot, ever, address what would be considered 'proportionate'.

On there topics, you have demonstrated, time and again, that your 'opinions', terminology, and grasp of things are tenuous. Hence my comment, and I think there are numerous examples supporting it. by now. I'm not interested in your waffle, words games, oddball definitions and so on. Killing civilians by intentions is one thing, civilians getting killed in a war is another. You are constantly broadcasting Hamas talking points, thus granting them a legitimate status. Spin it as much as you like.

@thaibeachlovers Officers don't die in wars? On battlefields?

TPS in action. Nice.

@ozimoron Legitimate how? Look at some of the pictures attached. Or guess you don't do that, so later on you could claim you 'haven't seen' any evidence blah blah blah.

@thaibeachlovers IMO, you're just trying to normalize antisemitic conspiracy theories.

@thaibeachlovers Not seeing you whining about Qatar, who's AJ outlet is your source of information for things ME. Not seeing you whining about Russia supporting Hamas, not lifting a finger to do much either. It's just USA and Israel as far as you're concerned. And factually, you're wrong. A whole lot less bombings for a while now.

What you 'think' is irrelevant, given your foggy grasp of things. You cannot support what you suggest, you're just spewing biased 'opinions' claiming they are as good as facts. Same same is something you say, but fail to demonstrate. Hamas intended to kill civilians, Israel does not wage its war with such an intent. It's only the same in your mind. You are posting rationalizations, justifications, talking points and generally try your meager best to normalize Hamas's actions. Call it what you will, but it's pretty obvious.

Another topic, the same topic hijack attempt.

@sirineou You guys sure come out of the woods now.

@thaibeachlovers The Houthies are attacking ships in international waters, flying flags of countries which they aren't at war with even. It's 'the same' only in your mind and propaganda posts.

@thaibeachlovers Other than in your imagination and propaganda posts, Biden cannot do this 'tomorrow'. Notably, you never ever comment about Hamas being able to stop things at will. It's just the USA and Israel, as far as you are concerned. And sure, you want to appease the Houthies, it's obvious from your posts. Won't happen.

@thaibeachlovers I'm sure that it is not complicated to understand that countries may have more than one interest to tend to. It's not like China is single minded invested in anti-USA stuff. There are economic interest, domestic ones - and many of these are interrelated. If the Houthies effect on maritime traffic, costs effects China's economy, that may take precedence. If war break out, it's surely not going to do much for China's energy needs as well. Negative effects on the economy might lead to domestic unrest of one sort or another - and so on. Just some easy examples.

One day....

@ozimoron It's irrelevant. Period.