Morch

There are limits to that too.

@ozimoron This has nothing to do with Ukraine. And you're intentionally muddying the water with the Houthies reference. Essentially, what you did above is normalize the Hamas attack and Palestinian terrorism in general. Now 'deny' it. You can spin things all you like, they were calling for violence.

Considering your own post was a deflection, not sure what you're complaining about.

@ozimoron More bizarre comments. The Intifada involved a whole lot of cases of terrorism.

@ozimoron As Mom used to say, 'you see what you want to see'. You do the same on any discussion of such protests. Blanket denials, or at best 'accepting' that a few were being naughty. That's in the face of facts and evidence. When it comes to Israel, it's the other way around - all you can see is negative.

And how is this related to the topic?

@ozimoron What you cannot do is twist what people say. They are not called antisemitic because they support the Palestinian cause. They are called antisemitic when they spread antisemitic conspiracy theories and tropes. Or when they call for the destruction of Israel. Talk about 'wide brush'. Pathetic.

Considering some of them are part of the current Israeli government, its kinda amusing.

@Neeranam Some can be anti-Israel, and anti-Jews. Like you.

Read the OP. Watch the pics and the signs. That you don't find it disgraceful doesn't mean a whole lot.

I think so. There are less reports about it in Israeli news (which aren't shying away from covering such stuff), and the casualty rate seems to have gone down some (I stress, some - and, of course, it's not uniform). What they are highlighting now is attack helicopter operations and sorties (which are less devastating in terms of destruction and civilian casualties). Previously there was some report or the other about IAF bombing this or that on an almost daily basis. Less of this now. The latest report I've read was that the IDF is looking into ways of evacuating people from the South of the Strip back to the North, so that the campaign could be carried out more forcefully, and with less civilian casualties. Running out of places to move them about in the South, plus troops need staging grounds apart without civilian nearby. I guess that this also has to do with ICJ provisional ruling, and the need to manage armaments stocks.

Other than in your imagination and post, there is no 'Marxist regime' in the WH.

All these arms companies employ a whole lot of people. It's not just about the ones at the top pocketing profits.

@ozimoron AJ employees connection with Hamas was discussed and linked on these topics more than once. With your participation. You're lying. Or having one of them 'memory' problems, again.

@ozimoron So as usual, you keep repeating a talking point (regardless of it being factual or not) on and on, in the hope of it getting an 'improved' status. You cannot support your claims, so you just repeat them on loop, while deflecting and obfuscating all the while. It's how you roll. Citing AJ on matters Israel is a choice. A previous comment from Admin/Moderator about using AJ as a source seem to go ignored - but when it suits some deflection, you claim providing more links would be against forum rules...funny that.

@ozimoron What steps has Hamas taken? Where did you read that? Not talking about saying it will, but about actions.

@ozimoron Clearly how? You rarely differentiate between your opinion and facts, or bother to qualify your posts. Moving the goalposts, then denying it is also a thing with you.

I'm not the one trying to spin things, you are.

@ozimoron You somehow seem to rule out the possibility that people see these clips or read articles in links beforehand. Let me set you straight on that - most of the stuff you post is not 'news' by the time you post it.

Yes...and?

Says the poster you replied to.

Consult what you exactly posted on the post replied to. It's a conspiracy theory. Consult the post another poster replied to you, with figures. And rethink your nonsense.

Governments representing donor countries received the information and decided to act on it. Quite decisively. You go on and on about Israel, but fail to address the point of all them countries accepting evidence presented as reliable.

@ozimoron How did the Abraham Accords 'polarize' the ME?

There was that, or close enough. And a whole lot of violence on offer too. But....it was Thais protesting about Thai issues.