stevenl

You could also say 'sorry, I mislinked the first time'. The 5 million in that link is a prediction btw, not as claimed by the poster '5 million and counting '.

Probably the same person that taught him evolution.

Make a claim, substantiate the claim.

That's a different link, different address.

Nowhere in your link does it mention your quoted text. I shouldn't have to ask for a link anyways, it should have been given already.

From the sun, https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/26147959/shamima-begum-cost-millions-legal-bills/ "Her fight to return home has already cost more than £250,000 in legal aid, with experts estimating that could hit as much as £7million if she now takes her case to the Supreme Court. Paul Fulcher of The Legal Costs Experts told The Sun: “I can see this reaching £7million. “It can only get higher with the way this case it going. It’s a huge cost to the taxpayer.”" From your link, which is from 2022 so costs will have risen, "Legal experts believe that the cost of the case – in which Begum received legal aid – has already cost more than £2million.' The text you're quoting I don't see in your link, which would be impossible anyway since your link is from 2022. Your article has been updated a few days ago, but nowhere does it say what has been updated.

Could be. Source please.

Are you really thinking you're having a discussion with a troll, one who lives fact free, about facts? Dolf should be ignored.

And 'i don't care because I'm going to profit from it '.

So conservatism is limited to Trump?

So how about the Life on conception act from the Republicans? No IVF exception there. https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/431?s=1&r=67#:~:text=Introduced in House (01%2F20%2F2023)&text=This bill declares that the,an individual comes into being. "Introduced in House (01/20/2023) This bill declares that the right to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each human being at all stages of life, including the moment of fertilization, cloning, or other moment at which an individual comes into being."

You understand 'the whole of Europe '?

The whole of Europe proves you wrong. The CDU in Germany for example is by your standards a far left Marxist organisation.

According to an exit poll 58 procent of the Haley voters will not vote for Trump.

That's because of the reasoning the Hamas attack happened in a vacuum and should be seen as unprovoked and the start of the war. If it is placed in context one is labeled a vile Hamas supporter and anti-Semite.

And I hope she will use her status to prevent others from making the same mistake.

We'll have to wait for 1 more appeal. Your earlier post/arguments are morally sound, but have no bearing on leaving her stateless.

Check your numbers please.

Those disgraceful politicians you refer to, and I remember this case well, had first-hand knowledge of what this misfit did. They stated at the time, if the British public had access to the information that they had, nobody would be giving her an ounce of sympathy. This information was held by the judges at her hearing, hence many things were redacted, and a closed judgement issued for national security reasons. This included participating and witnessing decapitation of aid workers, and she said at the time when ISIS was flying high that she was totally unfazed by it. Furthermore, at the time, it was known that she was in a high position in the equivalent of the Women's morality ' police force ' set up to ensure all were following ISIS twisted version of Shariah law, again something she participated in willingly. So all you bleeding hearts on AN can do one! They should put themselves in the position of the families, and reserve their outpourings of sympathy for the of murder of innocent civilian aid workers, not a disgusting creature like this. What she did supporting ISIS, she did knowingly and willingly, and this continued well into adulthood. She only played the victim, claiming she was trafficked when the tide of the war turned. She wasn't trafficked, she overcame many obstacles to get there and join them, well she can bloody stay there. Her own parents had begged her not to go and join them, which she and her two friends took no notice of. All totally unimportant in relation to the legal decision to revoke her citizenship. Morality and legality don't always match.

So you have nothing but unfounded claims, therefore attack the ones with the facts

Finally you're there.

I don't know of any EU county requiring an IDP when the license is in English, like the Thai one.

I was referring to the Saudis as possible donors. Obvious if you look at the post I replied to. No chance of him getting anything from the bond agencies.

Even for those who can afford it, it's a big gamble. In order to pay off he would have to be elected and stay in function for a full term and the house would have to be cooperative.

Easily solved by a trial.