Jump to content

stevenl

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    36,929
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by stevenl

  1. Thanks. I presumed you were referring to her appeal that decision. Otherwise it was a superfluous post
  2. How did it turn out? Bad for your assessment.
  3. Irrelevant, is that why you posted it?
  4. Why is that? If they committed crimes, have a trial and lock them up.
  5. This ruling was about the lawfulness of the previous rulings. Morality wasn't looked at and I presume will also not be looked at if the legal battle continues. But I thought this was the highest court, what else is there to appeal? Surely there must come an end to this.
  6. Lol, from Hutchinson's lawyer. "Mr. Bobulinski claims under oath that he was not wearing a mask, that Mr. Meadows did not hand him anything, and that Ms. Hutchinson was 'fabricating facts,'" Hutchinson's lawyer wrote in the letter. "Perhaps Mr. Bobulinski's memory is impaired about the meeting, and a picture would help refresh his recollection."
  7. You really think they're doing this to get the lefties riled up? Not because they want to infuse Christian Nationalism into American politics?
  8. So we now have an appeal against the bond?
  9. That's the problem with untrustworthy/unreliable sources.
  10. With the gullible falling for it.
  11. There were quite a few of these around at tourist places. They talked to quite a few people. but proving they're working as guides is not always easy. I do hope it serves as a warning and will scare off some of the illegal ones.
  12. So you don't care but do post in the thread. And nothing on your claim the source is biased. So you have an opinion and stick to it, no matter what.
  13. Lol, government statements and indictments are not proof. Better stick to al Jazeera opinion for proof then.
  14. I am more interested in the trump administration already knowing he was lying, and after that the republican senate at best being used by Russian intelligence.
  15. Even worse, many Americans want to see America weakened.
  16. Yes, that unbiased 'the Black Voices for Trump coalition advisory board'.
  17. I agree you know all about fact free rambling.
  18. The poster you reacted to is not right wing. There was no insinuation at all.
  19. He was responding tosomeone else who claimed it likely engoran consulted with other judges. See the quote in the post.
  20. So why do you claim they're biased? Because of the result? I notice there is no answer to my earlier question as well to why the source is biased.
  21. You're living in the past.
×
×
  • Create New...