Jump to content

stevenl

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    34,791
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by stevenl

  1. 2 hours ago, sungod said:

    Must be sh!t being a farang on Phuket at the moment.

     

    1 hour ago, ukrules said:

    I've been saying this for years.

    They hate us, only now are we seeing highly publicised evidence of this, it was more subtle before.

     

     

    Not at all, thanks for your concern.

    • Confused 1
    • Agree 1
  2. 47 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

     

     

       In the real World, Israeli is being commended for keeping civilians causalities to a minimum and their techniques for urban warfare will soon be taught to all other armies that don't want to kill civilians 

     

    19 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

     

    What buddy? Interjecting where, a bit like you are doing now you mean?

    Since following the discussion is clearly not easy for you, hereby the post 

    • Like 1
  3. 16 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

    You a lawyer from NY too? Cool, which of the appelate points would you like to discuss? You are a lawyer, you know what the points are, both sides?

    Its a separate issue. If the DA fails to prove Trumps guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (assuming that standard exists anymore in this Judges courtroom) the appeal of the contempt will still go through. But you knew that, right?

    Please show me where I made a claim about the appeal.

     

    You however made this claim "The gag order will be reversed on appeal".

    According to your reasoning this opinion requires knowledge of NY appellate law. Looking forward to your expertise.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  4. 28 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:


    Having access to is one thing.

     

    Being fed propaganda and misinformation by algorithms designed to target people’s emotions and emotional engagement is something else.

     

    I do feel it important to look at the reality of how the internet and social media is being used to manipulate people, it’s not negativity to do so.


     

    See the comments, people don't even realize they're being played.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  5. 2 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

    Trump Praises ‘Very Smart’ Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

     

    “He’s been very nice to me, I’ve actually had a very nice relationship with him over the years,” he added. “But he’s a very good man and his heart is in the right place and he’s doing really well! I saw a poll, he’s at 22. That’s pretty good, that’s pretty good. Doing very well.” 

     

    Trump Calls RFK Jr. A ‘Left Lunatic’

     

    "In a post on his social media platform Truth Social early Sunday, Trump said he watched Kennedy Jr. on “Real Time With Bill Maher” and found Kennedy “far more LIBERAL than Maher” and other Democratic candidates, but has “no hope” because the Democrats “threw him out of the Party” for taking primary votes from Biden.

     

    Trump also went after Kennedy Friday night, saying in a series of posts on Truth Social he is a “plant” from the left to help Biden get re-elected, adding a vote for Kennedy Jr. would be “a WASTED PROTEST VOTE, that could swing either way.”

     

    That's Donald Trump, a very stable genius.

    He has to. At first he thought Kennedy would take votes from Biden, now he realizes he's taking votes from Trump.

    • Like 1
  6. 23 minutes ago, gerritkaew said:

    Car turned and just did not see the motorbike at such high speed coming. 
    the video stops yes and we did not see it all, but if it happened to me I also not check for the bikers here, all drive like on a racetrack without any lights or whatever.

    did you thing he would look at you when he drove the car,, forget it….

    So you don't care about the bike rider because they all drive too fast and wouldn't check on you if the roles were reversed.

    • Thumbs Up 1
  7. 13 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

     

    Surely at certain speeds, the car wouldn't be at fault if they could not anticipate that the vehicle would reach them in time as they would not do so if riding at a normal speed?  They might not have even been able to see him if he was far away but moving at speed.

     

    The car isn't at fault simply for driving into the path of another vehicle, if the other vehicle could have stopped if they were paying attention.  You could be making a turn, be delayed in clearing the opposite lane, and have someone strike you due to not looking at the road, who would have been nowhere near you when you began your turn.

    Car is at fault, speed of bike is irrelevant except for, in theory, a fine.

    • Thumbs Up 1
    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...