stevenl

Since the SC appears to be willing to hear the case this argument has been tossed out "The Trump campaign earlier accused Mr Smith of trying "a Hail Mary by racing to the Supreme Court and attempting to bypass the appellate process"."

You don't know, he could have just got onto the road. Your quote does not state at all how long he was on the road, could have been 5 seconds.

You do realize it would be his own lawyers asking the questions, or doing the badgering as you call it?

Could easily be the approaching vehicle just entered the road from a driveway or small soi.

So since the guardian published I, the opinion of the quoted Tories is to be ignored.

Amir Weitmann, the head of the libertarian caucus in Israel's ruling Likud Party, From https://www.kyivpost.com/videos/23228

"It’s hard to imagine this was ever actually a priority,” I think that's the crux of the issue. This is theatre, it may look good and distracts from the real issues.

'A Likud partymember' is not doing his position or influence justice.

No, going downhill.

Looking forward to a link of that peer review.

His company has been found guilty already in this trial.

Video shows it all, the pickup is the culprit.

I don't know who you mean with 'we', but I appreciate science. Scientific opinions and articles I value on a topic like this, non scientific opinions not so much.

So the answer is no, sarcasm is a foreign comment to you. If you want to ask Danderman a question, send him a PM. Questions on the open forum are for everyone to see and respond to.

Ever heard of sarcasm?

The royal family is around.

I don't see why it would. People will simply change their hours but not increase

Thanks for a post without personal attacks on other forum members or taking swipes at other people.

I really don't understand this. Why the consistent need for personal attacks because someone has an opinion different from yours.

I like the idea of a monarchy, think it has more standing and believe letting politics handle the present roles will not be an improvement. Let them be, but an assessment of the financials is warranted. And yes, I agree it is totally undemocratic.

Not the first time and it wont be the last time.

No you were not, you were denying facts. The number and extend of lies by Trump surpasses all.

You 're asking posters here for proof of something he and his business have been found guilty of already.

Strange post. There was plenty of evidence against Trump, the Republicans refused to impeach. There is no evidence against Biden, and you accuse Democrats? Where were you when Trump was impeached?

Looking at their frontrunning presidential candidate I doubt that's the reason.