ozimoron

what claim did I not support with a link?

I believe that advice is more applicable to people who train every muscle group every day for the three days whereas I train each muscle group only once in three days at most.

Housebreaks have little relevance to the extreme homicide death rate in the US and no relevance at all to mass shootings using high rate of fire weapons with high velocity. A shotgun is the most effective home defense gun.

I love links. They dispel mere opinions and provide scientific basis to arguments.

Most days, yes. I train different groups of muscles each session over three days. All the research I have done (a lot) indicates that HiiT is the best form of exercise for lengevity. I combine that with a mediterranean diet and intermittent fasting. I don't believe that I'm doing excessive training. In practise I do about 5 times a week and I do more with weights in sets than I do hard aerobic exercise. I do aerobic exercise more moderately than the studies suggested causes damage. Usually three HIIT sessions are recommended in a single week. But one study found that working out intensely for three days and being sedentary for four days each week did not improve the blood pressure or body fat as much as exercising moderately five times a week. https://advancedmolecularlabs.com/blogs/news/new-study-says-high-intensity-interval-training-hiit-can-cause-mitochondrial-dysfunction

I have provided three links. You have provided none.

Of course, you should always check with your doctor before starting any exercise program. But HIIT is safe for adults of all ages and may well be a great option for you. https://www.hss.edu/article_hiit-workouts-seniors.asp

I asked you to provide links to evidence. You have consistently failed to do so while I have provided links to demonstrate that HiiT for the elderly is both effective and safe. Your condescending and demeaning attitude matches your apparent lack of knowledge.

High Intensity Interval Training - is it Safe for the Elderly? Research suggests there is no increase in serious adverse cardiac events or musculoskeletal injuries when engaging in HIIT compared with moderate intensity exercise. However appropriate exercise prescription can help to minimise risks. All individuals are strongly recommended to seek medical clearance by their doctor prior to engaging in a HIIT program. https://www.donvalerehabilitationhospital.com.au/For-Patients/Blog/High-Intensity-Interval-Training In summary, as the global population continues to age, early research on the impact of aerobic HIIT in older adults suggests that this training method is generally well-tolerated, feasible, and may confer many health advantages to this population. https://sportsmedicine-open.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40798-021-00344-4

I am 68 and never went to a gym in my life until I joined one in Pattaya and engaged a personal trainer for HiiT several months ago. I train almost every day for at least an hour. I have a family history of stroke and have had a blood clot. I have long term high cholesterol and high blood pressure. I am doing well on HiiT. A sure fire way to tell when someone doesn't know what they are talking about is when they start accusing others of not knowing what they are talking about without evidence to support their claims.

I'll remind you of your obligation to provide a link to a claim of fact. I am challenging your assertion that there is a house rule against a protest during a recession.

Again, what rule did they break? I challenged you and you know very well you are required to put up. The protest was during a house recession. Two young black males were expelled and one older white woman was not for the same "infraction". What does that suggest if not racism?

The logical failure here is that the second amendment doesn't prevent or require that no guns be banned. Fully automatic weapons are heavily restricted to the point of being banned for all practical purposes. AR15s could easily be afforded the same treatment. Whaich would I rather face? A tommy gun or an AR15? Not a difficult decision.

How is it irrelevant? What rules governs not protesting during a recession?

Just another example of only getting information from the echo chamber and not doing any fact checking.

I watched it too. Did it escape you that the protest on the floor occurred during a recession?

The advice is that there are better ways to achieve weight loss in a healthier manner. Not that the rice diet won't result in weight loss. A 30% reversal of diabetes is not great compared to modern diets like the Mediterranean diet, especially when combined with intermittent fasting.

Complete BS. Older people need strength training to avoid chronic diseases like Alzheimers. HiiT doesn't need to be extreme and it should be proportionate to a person's age and physical fitness. There are no circumstances where it is contraindicated unless a doctor says otherwise. I note you didn't post any link to support your claim. That generally means it can't be supported.

I never said that. The premise was that this judge had received more than most.

99% of people take a phone. There's no excuse to not have a photo of the ID and visa pages.

They're otherwise known as republican mega donors. You've probably heard of them. One of them has been coughing up so Clarence Thomas can live a life of luxury.

Hakeem Jeffries.

You suggested that many people would not return, back that up as requested. After that I'll prove that most do return.

The mere mention of an investigation against Clinton by the FBI in 2016 cost her the election so it seems a stretch to imagine that Trump would benefit by these charges.

I can't recall, it was too long ago. One of my first trips to any bars in Thailand, likely early 1980.