ozimoron

How do I do that living in a rented condo in Thailand? How is that related to honesty? I'm not the one making patently false claims without links to evidence. Try obeying the rules of the forum instead of just trolling and wasting our time. My participation on this forum is premised on the willingness of others to debate in good faith and provide evidence and reasoning to back up their arguments. You aren't doing that.

What happens to your body after you quit drinking https://www.rawstory.com/giving-up-alcohol/?traffic_source=Connatix

Florida judge whacks Trump lawyers with nearly $1 million in sanctions for 'misuse of the courts' https://www.rawstory.com/trump-lawyers-sanctioned/

I think he's guilty based on the fact that he wasn't required to point the gun at the person he shot.It wasn't in the script. At that point he was, to some extent, behaving recklessly. He should have checked the gun as anybody would. Other than that, I think it wasn't his problem that the gun had a live bullet in the chamber. If the shooting had occurred in the making of the film he would have been blameless.

Got some poll evidence for that or just an opinion based on ... nothing. Do you just aim to troll or are you actually willing to do some research before running your mouth? Is intellectual honesty important to you? Auckland, 25 July 2022 – Among the 32 countries surveyed by Ipsos, New Zealand is most worried about the impact of climate change around the world with the majority (81%) of New Zealanders expressing concerns about the impacts of climate change that can already be seen in other countries https://www.ipsos.com/en-nz/nz-attitudes-and-behaviours-towards-climate-change Of those surveyed, 50 per cent of New Zealanders are very or extremely worried about the impacts of waste. https://environment.govt.nz/facts-and-science/science-and-data/understanding-new-zealanders-attitudes-to-the-environment/ When asked if businesses would be failing people if they didn’t act now on climate change, 68% of people globally agreed, while 60% of New Zealanders agreed. When it comes to individuals, globally 72% agreed that if individuals don’t act now to combat climate change, they will be failing future generations. 62% of New Zealanders agreed – in Australia, it was 69%. https://genless.govt.nz/stories/how-new-zealanders-feel-and-what-were-doing-on-climate-change/

What did Trump and his minions want you to think?

I guess you don't know much about your own country?

No they won't. The defense lawyer will not agree that his client robbed the bank despite his fingerprints everywhere. A fact is that the sun is that the earth is round, not everybody agrees.

"Unproven hysteria that human activity is causing it"? That's because you won't read links to articles quoting credible climate scientists. I'd read any links you post that are credible. Go for it. Your use of emotive language betrays zealotry and an unwillingness to actually engage in an evidence based debate .

Cute. You didn't have sufficient reasoning power to realise that I meant population? Actually, you did because you mentioned it but thought you might just take a free hit anyway. Well scored.

A common theme of climate change deniers is that they never will provide a credible link to their politically motivated claims. They just get hostile to advocates of action to address the problem.

Her parents supported her in her endeavours. Most good parents do that.

She's achieved a lot for a disabled person. TIME's 2019 Person of the Year. Thunberg won the Gulbenkian Prize for Humanity in 2020 and stated her plans to donate her €1 million prize money to worthy causes through her foundation. Greta Thunberg has amassed a net worth of approximately $1 million, making her one of the wealthiest climate activists in the world. https://finty.com/us/net-worth/greta-thunberg/

For people who claim not to be puppets they certainly know how to fall in with the party line. Conformity at its best. Do your own research they said. Don't trust experts they said.

I post link to "other's stuff" here every day. Am I a puppet?

Everybody who believes an expert is a puppet now? You've got nothing useful to contribute obviously.

She isn't my hero, stop projecting. I didn't claim that she did or did not understand. I don't care or need to show what qualifications she has. Furthermore, she doesn't need science qualifications, she only needs to believe the experts. She's a public figure, not scientist. I have read no scientific claims made by her other than repeating what experts have said. That's a lot better than some of her detractors can say.

Stop dodging, I'm not the one making the big claim. You are. Prove that it wasn't just an attack on Thunberg. You're a PhD and you haven't even made yourself aware of the forum rules? Laughable. You could at least self report.

A video doesn't work here. You're not a scientist, you don't comprehend anything about scientific rigour. And just to be clear, I'm not suggesting she does understand. I'm challenging your claim that she doesn't. Prove it. Otherwise it's just another worthless attack on Thunberg.

You somehow never mentioned that discipline of science that you understand. I understand scientific papers too and I don't have a science degree. You made the claim that she doesn't understand much about the science now back it up. You do know that it's compulsory, right? A couple of links to factual statements she made that demonstrates she doesn't understand the science will be fine.

- U.S. Representative George Santos competed as a drag queen in Brazilian beauty pageants 15 years ago, two acquaintances told Reuters on Wednesday, adding to contrasts that have drawn criticism of the openly gay Republican congressman's staunchly conservative views. He has backed Florida's "don't say gay" bill, which prohibits classroom discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity. Republicans are increasingly denouncing drag shows and performers, claiming they are harmful to children. https://www.rawstory.com/embattled-u-s-rep-santos-was-drag-queen-in-brazil-pageants-say-associates/

You're a climate scientist? Then you should be able to provide a link to something about climate change that Thunberg doesn't understand. You made the claim and the rules here compel you to do so.

Unlikely. It depends on who they use for email services or whether thy host their own email. I assume your password accesses only your server.

Nobody should pay for environmental destruction they cause?

What would the "bigger plan" be and who planned it?