Jump to content

ozimoron

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    19,506
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ozimoron

  1. Those rights have been inherent in US elections for decades. Dismantling them is contempt for democracy. It is well established and incontrovertible that voting restrictions reduce voter turnout among the poorest.
  2. Only the US is actively engaged in denying and downplaying it's slave history.
  3. People don't believe that at all. They are pushing back on the right's attempts to minimise the history and mischaracterise it as something other than a shame period in US history which left massive racist sentiments and which have never been reconciled.
  4. anti-wokeness is nothing other than ignorance of the issues and bigotry.
  5. Here's a start. https://edition.cnn.com/2021/05/06/politics/desantis-signs-florida-bill-voting-restrictions/index.html
  6. Stop trying to normalise slavery. What happened in ancient times has no relevance to what happened 200 years ago or less.
  7. Or denying that the outliers face any issues which is what the person I responded to attempted to do.
  8. Your fantasies about what the "woke" want are not based in any kind of reality that you can elucidate. They are your opinion and you make no effort to support it.
  9. Ad Fontes Media rates Raw Story in the Skews Left category of bias and as Generally Reliable/Analysis OR Other Issues in terms of reliability. https://adfontesmedia.com/raw-story-bias-and-reliability/
  10. You claimed Biden was self serving. Just another unsubstantiated throw away deflection?
  11. I guess that's true because the video is in no way related to the topic.
  12. Texas is suffering a 'culture of death': San Antonio Archbishop https://www.rawstory.com/san-antonio-archbisop/
  13. Show me an example of even an allegation that Biden is grifting or has violated the emoluments act. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/desantis-promotes-covid-drug-top-donor-invests-n1277049
  14. Once you are unable to put up a cogent argument instead.
  15. How is any of that relevant to a person who is actually offended? I don't see anybody on this forum whining like a baby other than perhaps those whose wish to offend with impunity is challenged.
  16. The distinction must be drawn between personal harassment and criticising a person's beliefs.
  17. Irrelevant ridicule doesn't contribute to the debate.
  18. The West needs to stand up and defend its principles, not appease an anti-democratic despot.
  19. If those comments are directed at you personally then yes. The OP's harassment wasn't out the subjects beliefs, they were about her medical history.
  20. You claimed a law existed then failed to provide a link to that law. I'm entitled to consider your claim to be false. That would be rational in anyone's mind.
  21. You're deflecting from the point that the hearings have done tremendous damage to Trumps credibility and chances.
  22. Attempting to make any kind of equivalence there makes your argument a joke if the damage done to these kids wasn't so sad.

×
×
  • Create New...