ozimoron

Trump needs to hurry. Republicans are already split on whether Trump should be charged, whether he should stand again and donors are already favouring the Florida dude.

sunlight too much for you?

Wouldn't it be nice and easy if everyone's genes followed a normal and predictable pattern?

Nobody gets a free pass to offend somebody on a personal level, as opposed to attacking their opinions and views. There is a big difference. This scumbag chose to do so. He was fired from his job and could legally have challenged that. How did that work out?

The twitter rules are clear on harassment. If people complain of being harassed, who will be the judge other than the person who claims to be harassed? What's important here is that this is about an individual person, not a generalisation.

Because he pushes offensive comments in the face of other claiming they are offensive. He doesn't get to decide if his comments are offensive or not. If he wants to continue to make them then be becomes a bigot.

People died and you think the investigations and presentations of findings are a farce?

"woke" is nothing more than getting educated. If this bigot had merely rescinded his harassment instead of being an activist he may have kept his job. Can you see that he is also an activist?

So your statement was false. It is harassment is the person who feels harassed claims to be harassed as a result of a perceived offensive comment.

Got a link to the law that said it's not? It's not necessarily a criminal issue.

"Republicans are bracing for Donald J. Trump to announce an unusually early bid for the White House, a move designed in part to shield the former president from a stream of damaging revelations emerging from investigations into his attempts to cling to power after losing the 2020 election," The New York Times reported. "While many Republicans would welcome Mr. Trump’s entry into the race, his move would also exacerbate persistent divisions over whether the former president is the party’s best hope to win back the White House. The party is also divided over whether his candidacy would be an unnecessary distraction from midterm elections or even a direct threat to democracy." https://www.rawstory.com/trump-2024-announcement/

I think you've just displayed your true colours.

There we differ. I fail to see how if someone offends me I don';t also feel harassed. Offense and harassment are the domain of the recipient, not the perpetrator.

Her medical history remains a private matter no matter how many bigots out her.

Probably not but if you drink enough beer you'll be able to sing really well.

Because if Trump did actually go to the Capitol he would likely have been charged as advised by his comrades. The possibility that he attempted to go there against that advice demonstrates intent.

Twitter is private and can enforce these rules as they see fit. It's only in the public domain because intolerant click bait media published the details.

Ever thought about doing a little research before asking questions like this which evidently have a readily available answer? https://edition.cnn.com/2022/06/30/politics/liz-cheney-secret-service/index.html

Never drove drunk? Never owned a high powered motorcycle? Never took a recreational drug other than cannabis? Never had unprotected sex with a sexually promiscuous girl? Never swam in shark infested waters? etc. etc? Your life was that boring?

How is her medical history not private? If this wasn't a hot button issue for anti trans bigots it wouldn't be reported on at all.

whose reality? ????

The SS can't prevent them from testifying. I don't think this is a national security issue.

Read the rules about social media posts. 18. Social media content is acceptable in most forums. However in factual areas such as but not limited to news, current affairs and health topics, social media cannot be used unless it is from a credible news media source or a government agency, and must include a link to the original source.

Ok, that's different. If I could afford a private school for my kids I'd send them there as well as long as it wasn't a religious teaching school. I believe not many people wouldn't want the best education for their kids.

The subject's medical history is a private matter. Discussing her medical history without her permission is harassment, if not an outright crime.