Liverpool Lou

14 individuals according to the slightly dodgy translation of the actual article...I think.

Reading is not your forte safe to assume ? Comprehension is not your forte, safe to assume, my post was accurate. What part of my comment, specifically, do you think constituted an incorrect reading of the OP?

Generally speaking, if one commits a murder and subsequently leaves the area hurriedly, it would be considered fleeing Generally speaking, those fleeing don't return a couple of days later, that would be considered not fleeing.

Believing the response was just for you is somewhat narcissistic don't you think Lou ??.. Not at all when you quote my comment and respond directly to it!

For finding out a Asiannow storey you must look at the links before posting a reply in your opinion? Poor journalism is the problem Mr Lou Yes, always a good idea to read the full article before asking questions that are answered in the OP! "Poor journalism" is not the problem, the journalism is exactly the same in the full story that explained everything very clearly. The real problem is the "I-can't-be-arsed-to-read-the-article-but-I'll-pile-in-with-a-bashing-post-that-confirms-what-I-am-ism".

He either knew them or they spoke Russian, which he by chance understands...or they spoke English...or Thai...or Korean.

"Now"? Since when have foreigners not been allowed to invest in massage businesses?

Massage, probably.

What drivel. You're getting your "salivating" mixed up with your "nonsense".

I know, I can read, I didn't need an explanation.

Gawd... The story is told, in full detail, you've just got to read it

...or, if it happened in a launderette, "Nut Screws Washers and Bolts".

No, that's not what happened, he did a runner on the whole fare before they got to the destination.

The Can't Read Club is out in force again!

Read the link.

Not at all vague if you bother to read the full report. All the answers are there.

Thaiexaminer said he went to Pattaya. I didn't post that he didn't go to Pattaya, I said that he didn't "flee" to Pattaya, his friend, whom he allegedly visited, was in Pattaya.

Huh? A EAW is an arrangement between EU states only, not internationally. An international warrant (if there was such as thing) would be valid internationally, not just in specified jurisdictions.

He didn't "flee to Pattaya", he went to visit a friend suffering from cancer and then returned home a couple of days later.

No it doesn't, that suggestion was not made by any of the authorities or her family.

"Obviously he relied on her wealth...". Not "obvious", at all, nowhere was it reported that he was a lazy POS or that he relied on her wealth.

Are Lawyers part of the interrogtion process in Thailand?! Of course, they are, if they are requested.

Very generous and benevolent of you to think about others.

Wrong. An International arrest warrant (EAW) also called an Interpol arrest warrant is a legal document issued against an individual in another country that requires extradition. People are often arrested when they cross a border or are stopped for unrelated reasons. Wrong. An EAW is a European Arrest Warrant that applies only to member states of the EU, they are not "international". Interpol does not issue arrest warrants, it is not a police force. It does issue advisory Notices to member police forces that can be acted on, or not, with the discretion of those police forces and then that action requires extradition unless all parties are in agreement.

...unless they're wanted in a third country!