Liverpool Lou
-
Posts
26,732 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by Liverpool Lou
-
If it was a pawn shop, they do not have to check the ownership of the item (they have the borrowers ID) but they would lose the gold if the investigation located it. Unless it could be proved that the pawn shop knew that it was stolen, losing it would be all that could happen.
-
That's were he'd go, they don't go to women's prisons
-
Sort of defeats the object of a pawn shop! The shop always has the ID of the person pawning.
-
No, 'there' is correct in his post. Jesus Christ, I do know that, hence the exclamation mark.
-
Don't forget your tendency for long-windedness also!
-
"They're"!
-
Yes, I noticed that you gave me one. It wasn't him, it was the other anonymous bloke!
-
Fast Track Bangkok Airport
Liverpool Lou replied to LauChan's topic in Thai Visas, Residency, and Work Permits
Does this include all Thais? Apparently not unless they are in those categories but I believe there is a line for Thai passports. -
Fast Track Bangkok Airport
Liverpool Lou replied to LauChan's topic in Thai Visas, Residency, and Work Permits
If one travels business class one can automatically use the Fast Track or VIP Immigration line. One knows already. I was responding to Gandtee who did not appear to be aware. -
Fast Track Bangkok Airport
Liverpool Lou replied to LauChan's topic in Thai Visas, Residency, and Work Permits
One of theses perhaps?... Passengers who can use the Fast Track are: First Class passenger / Business Class passenger / Person with a disability / Infant / Pregnant / BOI and APEC Business Travel Card (ABTC) / Smart Visa / Long Stay / Thailand Privilege / Buddhist Monk / Senior Citizens over 70 / Official, Diplomatic Passport / Crew" -
You don't know that it's called UNCAHP ???? Strange, strange, strange You don't know that was a typo? Did you know that multiple question marks is ridiculous, not conventional nor recognised? Strange. UNCAHP does not specifically state anywhere that the keeping of lions privately is illegal in Thailand. Neither does WWF or PETA (not that PETA has any authority on anything). Strange that you don't know that.
-
If you can't read and understand I can't help you. I do not you to "help me"! Read the links accompanying this thread in which it is confirmed that lions can be privately owned in Thailand with authorisation and registration.
-
Yes, it is. Registered or not, because it's not species appropriate. WWF will tell you. Or UNCAHP or PETA. Strange that you don't know that. No, it is not illegal in Thailand if the animal is registered. WWF, UNAHP or PETA (good grief) will not tell you the rules in Thailand. Strange that you do not know that.
-
"...to still claim we represent any form of threat simply for keeping money in a savings account is insulting to ones intelligence". Which banks have claimed that?
-
Clearly, you are out of touch with the fact that not every transaction can be made by phone, as a substitution for cash, many businesses do not offer that facility yet.
-
You have any evidence for that scaremongering nonsense?
-
You're right, what (of any significance) would there be for the banks to "be burdened with"? If there isn't enough balance to cover the ATM card, the card is cancelled, there are no overdrafts on savings accounts here.
-
Not if there is activity on the account, however small. A couple of my accounts never have more than B900 in them, unless I need them to have for a specific transaction, and none of it ever "disappears".
-
As long as the account has activity there is no minimum balance to be maintained.
-
Years ago, clearly.
-
.
-
Unlimited 100% deposit protection with GSB.
-
How could anyone but you know that? But, given that opening new accounts may not always be straightforward for some foreigners, closing an existing account would never make sense.
-
It's a cub.
-
Why? There are many much more expensive luxuries in Thailand, is there any suggestion that the lion cub's owner is money laundering, for example, or are you just advocating that everyone with possessions worth more than that car are investigated by the Revenue Dept?
