Liverpool Lou

Yes, there are, depending on the individual cases but Bullman was initially given bail after he was charged with assault, not murder, the charge was upped later. The full OP does explain it.

Before he did a runner he had been charged with assault and allowed bail, not murder.

Not Europe (Zone 5) to Thailand it doesn't!

What about my "correct"? What does that comment mean, could you re-do it intelligibly?

I'd bet they haven't got it as he was more than likely not carrying it when arriving at the hospital. It would have to have been produced at some stage, probably by his friends, to register his admittance at the hospital.

The hospital has no legal right to take your passport. It'd be irrelevant as the British embassy would provide an emergency travel document if he "lost" his passport.

Absolutely, he would be, private hospitals aren't dosshouses. My guess, though, is that if it came down to the hospital wanting him out and the family sticking to their no more money claim, the hospital would allow him to leave with a promise to pay the outstanding if only for for humanitarian and PR reasons. If the family ever did the right thing and coughed-up it's be a bonus for the hospital.

Would it, if there was an outstanding private hospital bill to be paid as in this case? What makes you think that?

Why expect the UK government to pay and set a precedent for covering overseas bills, does Australia do it for Australians?

How about less of the gratuitous self-aggrandisement?

Not much point when it seems that most people involved in these accidents void their policies with their behaviour.

No, Thailand is not proposing that!

No, it is not, the embassies are not there to negotiate payment plans for expenses incurred by their nationals. How could the embassy guarantee that the family pays the outstanding bills?

"Very demanding"? Of course they are, the hospital needs to be paid before he leaves because they know that the family have no money and the chances of the outstanding bill being paid once he's on a plane to the UK is negligible. Was the family's request for his intensive treatment any less "demanding", do they just expect free treatment for the unpaid portion of the care they incurred that saved his life?

Suits me fine, as that's is what you did say.

"Section 560. In case of non-payment of rent, the letter may terminate the contract. But, if the rent is payable at monthly or longer intervals, the letter must first notify the hirer that payment is required within a period not less than fifteen days." We were not discussing the period in which rent should be paid, that you referred to, we were discussing the seven-day notice to leave requirement.

Yes, that's right, it has to be done before +50k transfers can be made and that procedure starts on 23rd June, there is not a deadline of 23rd June for the photo to be taken as you stated, that can be done anytime.

That is not true, they're currently both quoting exactly the same rate for THB/GBP but, if they weren't, the difference would be almost insignificant.

Yes, he owns the Davis Hotel...even if you don't live on Soi 24.

The OP's gone quiet, wonder if he's clearing his room?

Thailand.

You are clearly wrong. No, he is correct.

Indeed, you are, see my edited comment.

If the tenant does not leave after 7 days then a judge has to be the one to decide on eviction and not the landlord as most are saying here. So i am correct what I say. No, you are not correct, you stated that an eviction notice from a judge has to be presented giving seven days to leave. The owner can give that written seven-days notice without the involvement of a judge. If the tenant does not vacate the premises in the seven day period, then an eviction notice signed by a judge should be obtained. EDIT: Apologies, I misread your first comment, you are correct. Seven days notice to leave, after that a judge's eviction order...officially.

"The landlord has to apply for an eviction notice from a judge". No , he does not. He has to give written notice to the tenant that he has a period of 7 days to leave the premises before launching an eviction procedure before the judge if he does not leave.