Jump to content

Mac Mickmanus

Member
  • Posts

    12,563
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Mac Mickmanus

  1. There seems to be a position available now on Koh Tao ?
  2. Why is that that there are so many people in the USA who think going on a killing spree is a good idea ? Is it the availability of guns or that as killing sprees are so common , going on the rampage is now a accepted outcome for a disgruntled person ?
  3. There should be a clause in their visa status that they need to impregnate a Japanese woman within three years or no visa extension
  4. "Sorry, this content is not available in your region."
  5. Its officially illegal and so the Police cannot acknowledge that it exists , so the Police don't see it when they look
  6. The suspect is an Asian Male and Police are currently trying to find him , if so, then it wouldn't be a "racially motivated domestic terror attack" , more likely to be a local dispute
  7. But the mining compony would be liable in both cases and that is a reason why the protestors/squatters were removed and that's why Greta had to leave
  8. Havent you seen the video ? 60 000 other people viewed the video , here , make it 60 001
  9. You really do not have to dissect and question my every word, The German mining company would have be legally liable if they allowed people to roam the mining site and there had been an accident . Whether they would have been prosecuted by the state or the people is irrelevant to the point that the mining company would be responsible for any accidents that happen on their private land
  10. It was filmed by another person in front using a camera phone
  11. Had the mining company allowed the protestors to freely roam the land , and had there been an accident , it is a dangerous environment , the mining company would have been liable for prosecution on health and safety issues .
  12. The mining compony owns the land and the protestors were illegally trespassing on the land and the protestors/squatters were illegally occupying the land/buildings and the Police had every legal right to remove them
  13. It is a mistake that many customers make , they don't realise that the bargirls are working in the bars and its part of their job to relieve as much money from their customers as they can . The girls are not there socially , they are working .
  14. It really is inappropriate these days to target a group of people based on their age , gender and race . It is racist , sexist and ageist and that isn't acceptable these days . Change your target group to a different race, age and gender and see how it sounds
  15. As you keep going on about "old men" in a derogatory way , how old were the scientists and what are their gender ? I do hope they weren't "old men" as well
  16. Oh yes, so it is , The Duke of Cornwall is the owner/recipient of the Duchy of Cornwall , thanks for pointing of that important bit of info . Duke being the person, Duchy being the land
  17. The point of the original post is that now that King Charles isn't the Duke/Duchy of Cornwall anymore and he now doesn't receive income from that estate , he has now decided to give that income to the tax man instead of keeping it for himself .
  18. https://duchyofcornwall.org/about-the-duchy/#:~:text=About the Duchy-,The Duchy of Cornwall is a private estate established by,HRH The Prince of Wales.
  19. The "Duchy of Cornwall" is Prince William and it is a title that he holds . Read the post that you replied to with that in mind
  20. She stopped by the protest for a photo shoot and a video and it made for a great action packed photo to see her being carried away by some policeman , she was taken away because it made for a good photo and video for her self promotion and publicity
  21. The "Duchy of Cornwall " is a person , it inst a place . Its a person title , rather than land area
  22. Was back then during Covid , a few add ons though like luggage and food
×
×
  • Create New...