Gottfrid

Both the sentences above creates a world of horrific thoughts. First we have the common knowledge and education of the general Thai person? Second, the doctors that disagree are the ones who are supposed to help and treat us? and so on............

Police just don´t get it again. They just think the guys are having fun filming themselves in a foreign country doing what they like. In reality, they are doing their work, and filming this to earn money on viewers. In reality working in Thailand without a WP. The question, though, is how far or short you should draw the line.

Puuuh, lucky victim. Without Anutin, he would have surely died.

Just another electric outage

Finally they know how to use the bombs

Just regular work. Police do nothing unless you pay them. Here they at least became active. ????

ust, yet another reminder to not go with van drivers in Thailand. Their reputation exceeds them.

Yes, and they are just using another version in the press to not get into difficult position.

No, it´s an opinion based on your standards, moral aspects, emotions and way of thinking. Others may have another way of looking at it. You are not the one who gets to decide what is a fact or not. Therefore, it´s your opinion, and if it is a fact according to you, then that will also stand for you and therefore be your opinion.

Yes, and you have repeated that 3-5 times uncontested. I am just saying that is your opinion. My opinion is that no one gets removed or detained during a peaceful protest.

You better look up the difference between removed and detained vs arrested? After that we can do further discussion. Ok, so you mean nothing with your posts. I can clearly see that further discussion here will not bear any fruit. But, if had been thinking before posting your quote, you would have understood that I used the word "mean" in relation to the quote. Then that must mean I did not put any words in your mouth, right? ---------------------------------------------- But, I am deeply sorry I have to break it to you guys. You know, sometimes things are just black or white. That´s when the the grey has been removed. That means, that there are no people being removed nor detained in a peaceful protest. That´s a BIG fact! Sometimes, it´s just that easy!

Yes, mean it was not peaceful enough, as well as they endangered their own and life of others. That´s not exercising a democratic right to peaceful protest.

You are making a comment on police actions, at the same time you are posting that she was exercising her democratic rights to peaceful protest. Because if it was a peaceful protest, means it was not breaking any laws. Something that also would not result in her being detained. So, if you think, everything was linked to your post. What your point is, I have no clue about as I have no abilities as a shrink. The fact is that she was removed and detained. That must then mean that she was doing something that was not her right do to or was not peaceful enough according to the laws and rules in the country she was protesting in.

Your opinion. I have a different opinion.

Nah, it do not depend on anything like that. You can not bend the word wrongfully as you please. If you have laws in a country, then it´s wrong to break them that is the pure meaning of the word.

Are you then meaning that the German police detained her wrongfully? Because it is a fact that they took her away, right? Think it is the first photo in this thread. So, if it is a fact she was exercising her democratic right to peaceful protest, why was she taken away? Still reads like your opinion.

This a truly amazing! How many time does it take? Ýet again, It was no claim! Look below once more. There you see what you call a claim. A claim that ends with a question mark, does not exist. My post and sentence ends with a question mark. Therefore, NOT a claim. Now I can´t explain that more clear to you. After it stand "Can you please show me......". This is to be understood as if, the answer is yes on the question. Most people understand such thing, and read, "if so", between the lines. After that, I can´t be touchy about anything that regards you or Greta Thunberg. she was removed out of a reason. In some channels and other media they say because she was to close to the mine with risk of jumping in. I believe that is just an easy approach, to get rid of the problem and just let her on her merry way home again. Once out of the country, they just say "YES" she is gone this time too! And that is my belief, and my opinion, and it will stay as is. Regarding everything about if it is a question or a claim, I sincerely hope we have settled now. Please do not make me explain again.

Judging out of previous post, I would say that seems the answer to that one would be a big yes in this case ???? Yes, That´s great! A person who worked with science most of her working life just got a new idol.

As, I said! you have been shown proof of that it was a question. Seems you realized that, and taking another approach. I have not made any false accusations. That seems to be your job. If I see it as she is a trouble maker, and should be locked up and have the key thrown away. Hell, that´s my rightful opinion. Nothing that I have to defend in front of you. Who do you think you are?

Some shops will sell fairly warm and new clothes. However, it can be a problem with your size. In that case you have the option to accept second hand markets who sell imported winter clothes or buy online and import yourself.

Option 1: Consider home! Was it better there? Go back. (If that ship not sailed because of selling all your assets to be able to live in Thailand. You know, living the dream as Mr. Cheese use to say) Option 2: Continue to moan! (At the same time as dreaming about being able to go home)

Yes, I have screenshot to back up there is a question and not what you are saying. Not digging, it is you who is falsely accusing me. Also here, It is you that refuse to realize you are wrong. You want to get on topic, then stop the false accusations. Otherwise, I will continue to reply to your false accusations. Yeah, it´s very nice for a person when they are allowed to go out an promote themselves. Being as well know and popular as she is, she is surely going to fool many. Per usual, then

As I said, I have given you the evidence in a screen shot. You are embarrassing yourself.

The following question, was in case of the first one was answered to need such back up. And, please! Are you his mate and protector?

I have given you evidence of that it was formed as a question. It is you, that are deflecting that fact. However, if you are amused, go on!