NoDisplayName

Not in Ukraine.

Is this according to the Globe or Mail or Express?

You are lying. Again. "Discouraged" was the NYT writer's clickbait headline wording. The text said "limit or avoid." There is no citation from any government memo outright banning anything. Even the author admits "All presidential administrations change the language used in official communications to reflect their own policies." Do betta, yo!

That can't be right. According to MSM, Putin is the reincarnation of Rasputin and is starting with Ukraine as a test of the western powers, in his bid to reform the Soviet Union, with the end goal of world domination. There, that's a much better narrative.

Defend itself against whom exactly? Shirley, not Russia. Putin just wants to sell gas. The only attacks on Europa have been the US/UK destruction of Nordstream, Trump's tariffs and demands they hand over Greenland. That's not counting the tide of illegal immigrants set loose by NATO regime-changing stable, secular middle eastern governments.

I'll take that as a "no."

The last time the Russians destroyed the Nazis in Kursk, did Roosevelt demand that Stalin sign a 30-day ceasefire?

He doesn't want the whole thing. He never wanted the four new oblasts. He din't even want Crimea. The Soviets would have been fine with paying the annual lease on Sevastopol. But regime change in hopes of getting the Russians kicked out in favor of a NATO naval base, oh, and ethnic cleansing of the Donbass, has consequences. He will remove the remnants of the azovs from the four Russian regions, and pause. If terrorism continues, Odessa will be next to have a free and fair referendum to secede from the apartheid regime.

Sure. Minsk, Minsk-2, Istanbul. Those would have sufficed, if implemented. But Putin isn't going to accept a Minsk-3 with the agreement incapable western powers.

Pssst, the intertubes has a googles! Even Donald knows that. The 100-Year-Old Loophole That Makes California Champagne Legal https://vinepair.com/wine-blog/loophole-california-champagne-legal/ Is There Champagne Made In The USA? https://summerstirs.com/is-there-champagne-made-in-the-usa/

GIGO

"We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat." -Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld

Then why publicly state the political assessment is with "low confidence," which is an admission your sources were worthless and weak, and in a word, UNcredible. Why not "moderate confidence", indicating you had some faith in your statement. Heck, why not announce it as being with "high confidence" and technically a "slam dunk." No, this is simply a political message that will be picked up by the conspiracy sites and repeated ad nauseam, believe by suckers. High confidence generally indicates judgments based on high-quality information, and/or the nature of the issue makes it possible to render a solid judgment. A “high confidence” judgment is not a fact or a certainty, however, and still carries a risk of being wrong.[1] Moderate confidence generally means credibly sourced and plausible information, but not of sufficient quality or corroboration to warrant a higher level of confidence.[1] Low confidence generally means questionable or implausible information was used, the information is too fragmented or poorly corroborated to make solid analytic inferences, or significant concerns or problems with sources existed.

Do you tinfoilers even bother to read the links you post? This is the second sentence in YOUR linked article: But the intelligence agency cautioned it had "low confidence" in this determination. Further into the article, which shirley, you must not have read: The review offered on Saturday is based on "low confidence" which means the intelligence supporting it is deficient, inconclusive or contradictory. How you say................"fake news"?

So, ummm, is Trump gonna haf'ta rescind his ezzekativ order, and remove it from the WHite house website? Executive Order 14168, titled "Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government", is an executive order issued by Donald Trump on January 20, 2025,[1] the day of his second inauguration as president of the United States. DEFENDING WOMEN FROM GENDER IDEOLOGY EXTREMISM AND RESTORING BIOLOGICAL TRUTH TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/ And golly gosh gee whiz! It even comes with definitions! (b) “Women” or “woman” and “girls” or “girl” shall mean adult and juvenile human females, respectively. Oh sure, but what's a femayle? Isn't it complicated? (d) “Female” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.

You are lying. Read the article YOU yourself cited. The Words Federal Agencies Are Discouraged From Using Under Trump "...agencies have flagged hundreds of words to limit or avoid,..." Or did you miss that the word "barrier" is on the list? Does this mean no more big, beeyootiful wall?

According to progressives, "woman" and "female" can't be defined. When asked to define “woman” by Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn, she replied, “I can’t…I’m not a biologist.” "I don't understand what you mean," Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet, D-Mich Rep. Herb Conaway said defining a woman is 'a more complicated question than one might know'

But they're fine with "not an inch to the east" doesn't count. I guess cause they use the metrical system in France.

Did you miss the budget resolution? Wasn't there a provision wedged in the declares 24-hour periods for the remainder of this term are not to be considered calendar days? There ya go! We're still on day one! Only drawback is that if days don't count as days, Trump's term will never expire. Guess he learned a little something from Ukraine after all.

Paying visitors to the taxpayer supported $100 million Ark Encounter "museum" can see how Noah kept dinosaurs on a big 'ol boat for a year, along with 8000 other critters, with only 8 people to shovel all the poop out of one single tiny window. What are the odds Doge will revoke this scam's tax evasion certificate? Probably less than the odds of the new, repurposed Department of Edumacation will classify the Flintstones as a documentary series.

CIA didn't say that. They rated their assessment as "low confidence." This is usually overlooked in the tinfoil nutjobbery propaganda pieces, for good reason. Low confidence generally means questionable or implausible information was used, the information is too fragmented or poorly corroborated to make solid analytic inferences, or significant concerns or problems with sources existed. It means, no surprise, that an unsubstantiated rumor was published as "fact" for political purposes on.............Jan 25, 2025.

https://www.rd.go.th/fileadmin/user_upload/lorkhor/newspr/2024/FOREIGNERS_PAY_TAX2024.pdf

Zombie Apocolypse! And behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom, and the earth shook; and the rocks were split, and the tombs were opened; and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; and coming out of the tombs after His resurrection they entered the holy city and appeared to many. Matthew 27:51-53 (NASB)

Rouge office. Banking statements are not required to obtain a TIN. You have no assessable remittances, and all your Thai income has had tax withheld at source. You don't have to enter any of those numbers on a tax filing, which would leave nothing but your name and TIN. You 'probably' don't even need to obtain a TIN or file, but you could to calm your nerves and to apply for a rather substantial refund. What is your agent charging for that service? At this point, since your rouge office is being particularly snotty, I'd consider filing this year, AND late filings for the past two years for those refunds as well.

Look on the bright side! Trump's term as president is defined by calendar days. No more calendar days = no more countdown to Vance in 2028. We've got a forever president!