Hellfire

Mentally unstable man, not a woman!

So you are ready for this KGB mouse to annihilate the future of humanity? This is really disgusting. But I am still sure putin is just bluffing. After all, even this despicable creature has children. You can scare Maga idiots. But they are minority. Glory to Ukraine and its heroes!

He cannot stop anything. His stay in power (as well as his regime’s) depends on a result of this war.

Let me ask you. It is a night time. You are going home with your hypothetical granddaughter. Then there is a drunk Russian guy suddenly moving in your direction. He is big, he is strong, he is aggressive. What is your action? Will you calculate that you do not have any chances vs him and will run away leaving your g. daughter to deal with him? Reading your posts - this is exactly what you will do. Most of the Ukrainians are different. They are ready to die - if necessary. Not you and not even your orange clown will tell them what is the best way for them to act.

This is your opinion, but it's important to allow those on the ground to make their own decisions. The claim that Zelensky is somehow solely responsible for the Ukrainian resistance is a piece of Kremlin propaganda, and it's completely false, as always. It is the Ukrainian people who chose to resist. In fact, they successfully prevented total occupation of their country in 2022-2023. That achievement alone makes their efforts incredibly significant

No comments on this russian BS propaganda piece.

No. Do you think you have a right to tell Ukrainians that they must stop defending their homeland? Let me assure you that Zelenskiy will not last 1 minute if he decides to surrender.

Do you think that most of the Ukrainians are at war because Zelenskiy told them so? They fight for their homes, for their families and for their dignity. Who are you to tell them what to do? Enough with stupid Moscow propaganda here.

What exactly Zelenskiy did to be blamed for this war and its victims? Did not surrender?

So, do you believe that your Tsar’s decision to use nuclear weapons would be justified if Ukraine were to win on the battlefield?

When the Germans reached Moscow in December 1941, the chances of the Red Army stopping them—let alone eventually winning the war—seemed slim. The Soviet Union was on the brink of collapse, suffering massive losses in manpower, equipment, and territory. Yet, against all odds, they managed to turn the tide. By comparison, Ukraine’s situation today, while difficult, is nowhere near as catastrophic as what the Soviets faced in late 1941. With sustained and well-targeted support from the West, the battlefield dynamics could shift significantly—and it may not take as long as some think.

This is quite a stupid post. War is never won until it is actually won. Just 3 years ago putin’s soldiers were raping and killing in Kiev’s suburbs. Where are they now? So keep repeating these Kremlin’s mantras as long as you wish. It will change nothing.

Who in their right mind would attack a nuclear superpower like Russia? After the fall of the USSR (1991), Russia was at its weakest—economically, militarily, and politically. If the U.S. and the West had truly wanted to "destroy" Russia (a central myth of Russian internal propaganda), there could not have been a better time to act. Instead, the West provided humanitarian aid to prevent mass starvation and helped integrate Russia into global institutions like the G8 and the NATO-Russia Council. The idea that NATO expanded in 1997 and 2004 with the goal of eventually attacking Russia is absurd—something only an uneducated Russian audience, bombarded by state propaganda, could believe. And now, in a bizarre twist, this delusion has also found a home among certain far-right circles in the West, particularly among MAGA activists.

I would say that this war played a role in NATO expansion (Finland and Sweden decided to join the alliance).

Putin did express interest in NATO at various points, especially in the early 2000s. There were multiple instances where he inquired about Russia's potential membership or a closer partnership with NATO: Early 2000s Discussions – In 2000, during an interview with the BBC, Putin said Russia could consider joining NATO if its interests were taken into account. Talks with Bill Clinton – Reportedly, Putin asked then-U.S. President Bill Clinton about Russia joining NATO. Clinton seemed open to the idea, but nothing came of it. Closer Cooperation with NATO – In 2001-2002, Russia engaged in deeper cooperation with NATO through the NATO-Russia Council, though it was never an official membership pathway. ------- Strangely enough, Putin was not scared of NATO "expansion" some 20 years ago. And Russia was a much more poor and weak country back then.

I lived in Ukraine in 2012-2013, and the idea that Ukrainians are "Nazis" is pure propaganda. They are among the least extremist people one can imagine. The fact that over 70% of Ukrainians elected a Jewish president—something Zelensky has never denied—speaks for itself. Meanwhile, Russia has far more Nazi sympathizers, and its current regime exhibits clear fascist traits: aggressive expansionism, suppression of dissent, state-controlled media, and a personality cult around Putin. The hypocrisy of Russian propaganda is staggering—they accuse others of exactly what they themselves embody.

To be honest, most Russians will never truly like a U.S. president. Their Soviet-era mindset ingrains a deep-rooted hostility toward American leaders. At best, Trump can hope to be seen as a useful idiot.

The world has become a much greedier place. Money is idolized as the ultimate value in life, while its true purpose—as merely a means to an end—is forgotten. This mindset leads to dangerous extremes. Those who lack money (the vast majority) often see it as the key to solving all their problems. But this is a harmful illusion—one that erodes human nature itself.

Another absurd piece of Russian propaganda: “They simply want to be left alone”—while invading their neighbors. There’s no doubt that Russia has always had immense potential. But its failure to build a free society has repeatedly delivered it into the hands of dictators, preventing it from ever realizing that potential. And now, history repeats itself once again—this time, with a former low-level KGB officer playing his power games at the expense of millions of Russian people.

Yeah, sure. I’d love for Putin’s bots to make this crystal clear—so even the most oblivious MAGA supporters can grasp it. Putin isn’t just fighting Ukraine; he’s fighting the U.S. and the entire West. According to the Kremlin, Ukraine is nothing more than a Western proxy. So when these fools talk about “making peace” with Putin by surrendering Ukraine, they need to understand that his ultimate goal isn’t just a few Ukrainian territories—it’s the defeat of the West, bringing it to its knees. The roots of this ideology is deeply Soviet, the regime's which was once named "the empire of Evil" by one truly great US president of the past. Putin is a Soviet revanchist—the worst kind of them all: a KGB officer. Still, I doubt they (the MAGAs) will ever understand anything until it is too late!

Russian propaganda is inherently absurd and nonsensical, built on defying even the most basic principles of logic. As a result, anyone who parrots it is quickly and easily exposed. Trump saying that Ukraine has started this war and Zelenskiy is a dictator - the best example of the Russian propaganda repeated.

All I can say is that he is definitely trying hard… to make Ukraine lose this war. This kind of ‘peace’ will only encourage Putin to invade more sovereign countries in the future. And not only Putin.

Are you sure that your Tsar will not decide to attack other neigbours after successful attack on Ukraine? Estonia? Latvia? There is some Russian population there, a nice pretext for the another invasion. Also - very close to Leningrad and Moscow, all those Estonians only wait for is to launch a missile attack on Kremlin!

Next, I suppose, is an attack on Finland and Sweden. Both obtained NATO membership while Putin was countering the ‘existential threat to Russia’—a threat that was merely a hypothetical possibility—of Ukraine joining NATO. Additionally, the Baltic states, once part of the former empire, have been NATO members for over 20 years. Then there’s Poland, also former Russian empire territory and a NATO member. This presents numerous ‘existential threats’ for Russia and potentially many wars ahead. Is the ‘orange clown’ prepared to pacify Putin and his feelings of being threatened by almost all of Russia’s neighbors? P.S. one must be a true MAGA village-idiot to believe these tales of Russian propaganda about their country (a nuclear superpower) being existentially threatened by its small neighbors without nukes. And these are the same small countries which were constantly terrified by the Russian Empire over 3-4 centuries (never the other way around!).

"Partial (limited) ceasefire"... hahaha... Who has invented this term? What next? Partial peace?