Red Phoenix

Great News, thanks for posting it!

From his postings it is clear that the Transman is already long time brain-dead. Only a stake through his heart would put him - and us - out of the misery he spreads. Oh wait, he doesn't have a heart, so we are stuck with his 24/7 malignant and obnoxious ignorance forever...

The WHO being the saviour of the medical profession??? You must be joking Transam or being your usual ignorant and obnoxious self.

And last week also the USA dismissed the proposed amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations. That's extremely good news, as that attempted WHO global Health power-grab will have no chance with the US opposing them. Jeff Childers in his free daily Newsletter Coffee and Covid commented: > Last week, The Hill reported that the U.S. officially rejected proposed amendments to the World Health Organization’s International Health Regulations (IHRs)— a sweeping package of globalized rules for pandemic response, surveillance, and information control that was to be voted into place this week. Among many other awful things, the IHRs would have: • Expanded the WHO’s authority to unilaterally declare health emergencies. • Empowered it to enforce global narratives and squash so-called misinformation. • Created frameworks for cross-border biomedical surveillance, digital vaccine passports, and border control coordination— without national approval. “The proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations open the door to the kind of narrative management, propaganda, and censorship that we saw during the COVID pandemic,” Secretary Kennedy said in the clip. “The United States can cooperate with other nations without jeopardizing our civil liberties, without undermining our Constitution, and without ceding away America’s treasured sovereignty.” “It lays the groundwork for global health surveillance of every human being,” Kennedy warned. “We must strengthen local authorities and keep global organizations in check.” The IHRs are a basket of Orwellian “guidances” that the WHO has been trying to pass since the resistance to pandemic overreach began in earnest in 2021. They almost made it. Last year, with Biden championing the process, and Democrats flooding Twitter with technocratic memes, only a single courageous country —Slovakia— vetoed and held off effective one-world biomedical governance. = = =

A Window Is Finally Emerging to Reverse this Unstoppable Tide of Corruption In this latest article published on his substack The Forgotten Side of Medicine the always worthwhile A Midwestern Doctor wrote an article delves into the background of and reasons for the longstanding corruption of the CDC. Source: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/where-does-the-cdcs-pervasive-dishonesty = = = Here some excerpts from the long article: The CDC’s Longstanding Corruption Everyone has specific government agencies they dislike. One of mine has been the CDC because the CDC always promotes and protects vaccines (regardless of how egregious the vaccine is), criticizes integrative medical therapies, and promotes disease management strategies that are not very effective (e.g., masking for COVID). It hence should not come as a surprise that the CDC has a longstanding history of corruption, did a variety of unscrupulous things to promote the COVID vaccines and in the present moment, has been the most resistant agency to the MAHA policies RFK Jr. has been working to enact (which in addition to being shown through news reports has been shared with me by people directly connected to the H.H.S.). Ideology or Corruption? For example, in the case of vaccines, while clear financial conflicts of interest can be shown in certain cases (e.g., what I showed above with the CDC), I find the zealous adherence to all vaccines being “safe and effective” tends to be ideological in nature, as believing in vaccines has been instilled as a core belief of anyone affiliated with “science” or “medicine.” Initially this can be quite subtle, but in time, that ideological bias quickly adds up. This is because (as mentioned before) most things aren’t clear cut, so depending on what one is biased to notice, one can rapidly be left with a world view where all “the evidence” supports their position, even if a great deal of it does not. Vaccine Injuries Because of this “ideological filtration” many everyday proponents of vaccination are completely unaware that severe neurological or autoimmune injuries are a frequent complication of vaccination. As such, when confronted with that evidence, they use a variety of mental excuses to dismiss those injuries such as them being “anecdotal” “one in a million” or an “unrelated coincidence”—even when person after person begs them to acknowledge the injury. Recently, we’ve seen this dynamic play out with the COVID vaccines (as the marketing for the vaccines made those on the Left, be strongly identified with supporting the vaccines), which has led to the extraordinary situation where many injured by the vaccines either won’t talk about it publicly (for fear of social ostracization) or won’t even acknowledge it. Conclusion During COVID, the ACIP meetings became a morbid hobby of watching a slow motion train wreck, as we knew nothing we did could derail them pushing the COVID vaccine along, but at the same time, we couldn’t turn our eyes away from it, as we did need to know what depressing vaccine policies were in the pipeline. At that time, ACIP and the CDC were still shrouded in their halo of “objective expertises” so it was immensely difficult to challenge what they were doing. Fortunately, because of how much they overstepped their authority, much of that trust was lost (e.g., now only 61% of Americans trust the CDC). As such, more and more people are becoming willing to question what they are doing (e.g., what the CDC said was absurd). Since a great number of people watched this ACIP meeting, many reached out to me with serious concerns or disbelief about what the CDC had said. In short, like many Federal Agencies, the CDC is continuing to operate as its own fiefdom, and it is for that reason they are continuing their longstanding playbook and continuing to gaslight the vaccine injured. However, we now live in a new era where these types of lies can no longer resist scrutiny, and we are on the verge of having broad swathes of the population, who had previously filtered away and dismissed “unorthodox” views on vaccination, become receptive to them. As such, we now have an extraordinary opportunity to expose this gross malfeasance and allow the other side of the story to be finally heard. > You can read the full article here > https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/where-does-the-cdcs-pervasive-dishonesty = = =

It's a sunday afternoon, so I suggest you take some time to think about your statement that "vaccines prevented the diseases themselves".

And the Award for Most Ignorant and Arrogant Quote of the Month goes to CJ in ChiangRai...

And you credit vaccines for the drop in these preventable diseases? Do some research and you will find out that in as good as all cases vaccines were only introduced when due to improved sanitation the mortality from the specific disease was already at a very low point.

Do some research, and find out who is the biggest sponsor of the WHO... USA and Argentina have cancelled their membership to the WHO. And Italy has just revoked the latest amendments to the WHO Protocol that would have given that unelected body unprecedented power over health decisions in its member states.

Nope, do some independent research instead of simply swallowing what the vax-pushers want you to believe. mRNA shots have killed and are still killing and harming many more lives that they 'saved'. The truth is slowly but inevitably emerging, despite the billions of US $ of propaganda trying to convince you that they were the best thing since sliced bread. And the relentless efforts to push ever more new mRNA shots and boosters, are falling flat (except for the cultish believers, that refuse to open their eyes to the reality all around them).

Wow, that's a real cracker > You can't miss what you only had for one or two weeks as a baby? Just ponder the enormity of that statement... Why then not also remove the appendix immediately at birth, as that will ensure you won't get appendicitis.

Even if you do not experience any long-lasting effects from the trauma that you definitely will have when being mutilated, there is no - non-religious - reason to apply it as standard practice on new-born males. Same as with the mRNA vaccine, even if you do not experience any harm yet that you definitely will get when being innoculated, the practice is neither safe nor effective, and more importantly: totally unnecessary.

I do realize that my posts are a 'drop in the ocean' compared with the 24/7 vax-propaganda. But as StiddleMump wrote, I want to keep the kettle boiling as one thread will not be sufficient to make the brain-washed start considering that there might be some truth in those annoying fact-based articles that ring a different bell than the mainstream media.

Do some research and you will find that vaccine-hesitancy is HIGHEST in those with a University-degree or a PhD.

For once I agree with you. Humans existed for thousands of years before that surgical religion-based mutilation was introduced. Just like they have lived for thousands of years without the need for vaccines, masks and 'a pill for every ill'.